besides, the JF-17 is one of those aircraft that looks more impressive in the air than on ground.
Yeah.... tejas is opposite.... looks great on a truck
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
besides, the JF-17 is one of those aircraft that looks more impressive in the air than on ground.
There is always room for betterment.But still something better than nothing.Ask Indians how they feel about it.Having your own plane is a different ball game altogether.
You feel different.
You feel satisfaction.
You feel proud.
It is just a beginning !
Abhi Ishq ke Imtihan aur bhi hen
Sitaron se age jahan aur bhi hen
No it is not! It is a bit fat and podgy. However looks arent everything and it is our baby and a huge step for a country like Pakistan..
A
Those asphixated with beauty - compare M2K trainer side by side.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KT211_AMD_Mirage_2000TH_Indian_Air_Force_(8414614218).jpg
https://quwa.org/2017/04/30/jf-17b-foundation-jf-17-block-iii/
Function over form....
JF17b is the lasting missing part to complete the puzzle game. Malaysia is now asking for it!All depends on camera angles besides, the JF-17 is one of those aircraft that looks more impressive in the air than on ground.
Looks like it is pregnant .
The Mirage 2000 is a very good looking aircraft. The JF-17B in its production stage will hopefully exhibit its own unique good looks...
Really some members here are the limit! Sometimes I think that they wouldn't settle for anything less than the Star trek Voyager! Then I read threads like this and realize they would consider it ugly.
For more fuelYes... in order to accomodate the extra seat... small jets have this problem with their twin seater versions...
Really some members here are the limit! Sometimes I think that they wouldn't settle for anything less than the Star trek Voyager! Then I read threads like this and realize they would consider it ugly.
need to some beautification workafter delivery of new bornSir it will give birth to block 3
if some body compear JF-17B outer cockpit design witf Grippen NG dual seat outer cockpit design ???Its not all about the beauty rather the work the fighter is meant for and can produce , now if the fighter had great looks it would be too pretty for you guys and now a fighter that is our own too call is to ugly etc ... wake up people its a fine looking fighter and will do great work needed for our PAF.
JF17b is the lasting missing part to complete the puzzle game. Malaysia is now asking for it!
You betcha! What is so cute about the
Intrepid class? I'll admit that Voyager
being more modern is the best looking
way above older ones but it is still a
derivative of the Akira class and looks
like an upside down spoon with pods!
Even the Defiant or Soyuz class are
in the kitchen/table utensils looks :
virtually a plate with pods this time.
Classes with the saucer in front and
the nacelles aft and up as found in
the Shepard class, Enterprises of the
Galaxy and the AR Constitution class
but not the original Constitution from
the series which although it is one of
my childhood loves I could understand
someone finding ugly or at least homely.
The Ambassador class Enterprise was fine
and more like what Voyager missed but the
Excelsior class one looked like a pregnant guppy.
The Sovereign class one is slightly better ...
Actually, IMHoO, the Bradbury class from which
the design for the Voyager prototype was clean
looking a bit behind the Dauntless class that
looks the most like a fighter in today's sense.
Anyhow, best of days to you, Tay.
need to some beautification workafter delivery of new born
if some body compear JF-17B outer cockpit design witf Grippen NG dual seat outer cockpit design ???