JF-17B Updates, News & Discussion

[Trailer23]

sir?

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

View attachment 621389​

I wanted to ask him another thing

 

[HRK]

 

[LKJ86]

"枭龙双座"
View attachment 621363
Via @航空工业 from Weibo

Via @航空工业 from Weixin

 

[StormBreaker]

View attachment 621495
Via @航空工业 from Weixin

That is certainly HMD, @Deino @The Eagle

 

[Maxpane]

View attachment 621495
Via @航空工业 from Weixin

looks like HMD

 

[mshan44]

 

[Maxpane]

View attachment 621675

i think all of them are B

 

[aziqbal]

good line of JF17B

would enable better ground attack and the requirement for Mirage will decrease

JF17B can replace Mirages and JF17 Block 3 can cover F16 C/D Block 52

 

[PakShaheen79]

View attachment 621495
Via @航空工业 from Weixin

What does this poster tell.

 

[Philip the Arab]

good line of JF17B

would enable better ground attack and the requirement for Mirage will decrease

JF17B can replace Mirages and JF17 Block 3 can cover F16 C/D Block 52

Back seat can guide SOWs, and launch cruise missiles from the back while letting front seat pilot work on piloting the plane. I love this idea a lot, but sadly unlikely.

 

[LKJ86]

Via @航空工业 from Weixin

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

 

[CHI RULES]

good line of JF17B

would enable better ground attack and the requirement for Mirage will decrease

JF17B can replace Mirages and JF17 Block 3 can cover F16 C/D Block 52

Sir in case of JF17B the service ceiling, low altitude speed as well as over all speed, load capacity, defensive measures should also be considered before replacing Mirages. As reportedly Mirage has high speed at low altitudes, better service ceiling and so far only plat form to carry Raad. However as per defensive capabilities it may understandably may have lower capabilities.

 

[mshan44]