What's new

JF-17 vs SU-30MKI turn rate comparison.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm assuming the jf-17 was probably developed with su-30s in mind, thanks to China's privileged insight into the airframe, with the mkk and j-11s. None the less, as much as we all wish the thunder would solve all our troubles, I think comparing it to one of the most maneuverable fighters on the planet is a little premature, if not completely irresponsible.

ps. never realized the mki was that huge!! those things could be used as shelter for the homeless when they aren't flying! (no offense intended)
:welcome: to :pdf: Boss it seems you have just joined in and you become serious in a non serious thread :rofl: ... go back and check the beginning posts of it ... you will find an Indian fan boy stuff posted by WAQAS119 then you may figure it what its about :azn: ... check it and have fun you will going to find a lots of threads like this in future :woot: ... Have fun while you stay here ;) :D
 
.
Now on the topic...

Regarding the turn rate comparison of JF-17 & MKI, please do not forget that MKI has got Thrust Vectoring Nozzles by using vectored thrust it can outmaneuver other Jets without much efforts.

Thrust vectoring, also thrust vector control or TVC, is the ability of an aircraft, rocket or other vehicle to manipulate the direction of the thrust from its engine(s) or motor in order to control the attitude or angular velocity of the vehicle.

Here is some details about TVC of F-22

f-22-raptor-thrust.gif


Jets with TVCs have a clear advantage in the WVR fight, like HERBST MANEUVER

Herbst%20maneuver.jpg



KULBITMANEUVRE.

090210_kulbit.jpg

Rgds,
 
.
Not again.........
Mods will freeze this thread very soon.

Any ways one thing that should be accepted that JF-17 is more agile then SU30 coz of its small size.

Thurst vectoring give the advant to MKI on few manvers.

Bottom line is that:- Its not wise to compare Cheetha(JF) with Tiger(MKI).

Both are of different characteristics!!!!
 
.
Now on the topic...

Regarding the turn rate comparison of JF-17 & MKI, please do not forget that MKI has got Thrust Vectoring Nozzles by using vectored thrust it can outmaneuver other Jets without much efforts.

Dont forget the size and weight of MKI.
I think MKI have few more manevers on JF.

But JF is more agile then MKI coz of its size and weight. its very simple n proven logic. Besides that its shape also plays vital role in sharp turns shown in China Fly Passes few weeks ago.
 
.
Aray yarr itna maza aaraha tha aik dum sub serious ho gayay ... itnay dinon say serious threads parh raha hoon ... Zubair bhai sara maza kirkira ho gaya rockstar aur aap ki post say ...
 
.
@muzbair
then y comparison of two completly different fighters.
 
.


Wow..Love this picture,,Brilliant>wonder how the "Jantaa" were allowed to sit under a multi million dollar plane?

The youtube comparison video of Tejas vs others is Doctored...The Tejas part is fast forwarded...Get it?
 
.
@muzbair
then y comparison of two completly different fighters.

No complete comparison its the turn rate comparison only.

Its very simple Tiger is more furious then Cheetha ....but Cheetha is more fast n agile.

Similarly JF is more agile then MKI (even with TVC) coz of its size, shape and weight.
 
.
Specially when protected under the SU-30 Umberala. :cheesy:

Kapil.jpg

First its Mig 29 not MKI.

Second there is no air force in the world including India allow civilians to be so close to an Air craft.

They might be their low class workers families. But that is ofcourse risky.
So one can imagine y they have so much crashes. shldnt be that must reluctant.
 
.
No complete comparison its the turn rate comparison only.

Its very simple Tiger is more furious then Cheetha ....but Cheetha is more fast n agile.

Similarly JF is more agile then MKI (even with TVC) coz of its size, shape and weight.

LOL JF-17 is no Chetah its a Chinese Fried Duck:rofl::rofl:
 
.
First its Mig 29 not MKI.

Second there is no air force in the world including India allow civilians to be so close to an Air craft.

They might be their low class workers families. But that is ofcourse risky.
So one can imagine y they have so much crashes. shldnt be that must reluctant.

It is a MKI not MIG 29 :agree:
Look at the size and shape of the air intake.
 
Last edited:
.
No complete comparison its the turn rate comparison only.

Its very simple Tiger is more furious then Cheetha ....but Cheetha is more fast n agile.

Similarly JF is more agile then MKI (even with TVC) coz of its size, shape and weight.

How will you define Agility?
 
. . . .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom