What's new

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting ..........


http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...ntinue-to.html
25/01/10
Flight International
SINGAPORE 2010: Asian fighter requirements continue to grow
By Siva Govindasamy

.................Beijing has held talks with several countries on the Chengdu FC-1, also known as the JF-17 in the export variant that was developed with Pakistan, and the light attack variant of the Hongdu L-15 advanced jet trainer. For JF-17 customers, China could set up an assembly line or produce components for the aircraft, just like some Western suppliers. This includes traditional and non-traditional clients, say officials.

"We are talking to about five to six countries for each aircraft, and air force pilots from some of them have already flown test flights," says Ma Zhiping, president of China National Aero-Technology Import & Export Corporation, which markets China-made military aviation products globally.

"We provide very capable aircraft at a very reasonable price compared to what else there is in the market. One of the biggest problems for many of our customers is financing. Many are developing countries and their payment abilities are limited. We work with the Chinese government in these cases to help them get cheap credit."

Exports of the Chengdu J-10 fighter are possible, but Beijing's priority is to develop an upgraded version of the aircraft. "This will take a bit of time and we are confident we will have a very good fourth-generation fighter when this is completed. Then, we could export the J-10 to our friends," says Wang Yawei, president of AVIC Defence, the military arm of state-owned aircraft manufacturer China Aviation Industry (AVIC)...yet another indication that PAF would get J-10B

.............Neighbouring Pakistan, with one eye on its rival, has begun indigenous production of the Chengdu JF-17 that Pakistan Aeronautical Complex helped to design. It also began to receive its newer batch of F-16s last year. In a few years, Islamabad is likely to ask Washington for more F-16s and attempt to buy a batch of the Chengdu J-10, China's latest fighter.
 
Avionics systems from western sources or Chinese sources, the final decision would be based on the availability of the best. As with avionics we are gonna go for weapons package too, so whatever best is available there out in the market, which we can buy, we will get it.

And another reason is diversification. There would be a mixture of Chinese and western avionic and weapon suits on the future variants of JF-17.

thanks! wow,that's a good choose for PAF. we are waiting for the jf-17 to make an excellent performance in military exercise in 2010 .:pdf:
 
wow u really wana see some weapon Test.
SEE THIS.....:eek:
d64dc788d27f727897d9b6a5278ea018.jpg


b82f34b7ba9b215a98987aa71645d418.jpg


AND THIS TOO
JF-17_13.jpg

a2a8f434d0d6a3955e14fc91768655e2.jpg

:pakistan:

it looks like more powerful than f-16a/b . a turth killer in the south -asia sky.
 
it looks like more powerful than f-16a/b . a turth killer in the south -asia sky.

Ain't you biting much more then you can chew? There is a whole lot of difference between F-16 in any of its form as comparison with JF-17.
 
Couldn't agree more... a gutsy slayer is just being unleashed!

May be background lights giving you a false picture to immediately make out JF-17 as a gutsy slayer, well I am not doubting its capability. But at the end of the day, it will take lots of testing to make it that milestone.
 
any1 knows the reason why JF-17 does not have IFR presently? i mean if we can fit it on old mirages then how difficult is it to fit on JF-17? why wait till second batch or later planes and not from begining ?
 
it looks like more powerful than f-16a/b . a turth killer in the south -asia sky.


Suzuki Alto is a good car... but doesnt mean we will compare Alto with Lamborghini!
 
Suzuki Alto is a good car... but doesnt mean we will compare Alto with Lamborghini!

you are wrong dear.

i dont agree with your analogy. first of all F-16 is not a lamborghini as compared to JF-17. their difference is not so much in size.

second, yes a latest alto with hi-tech equipment can certainly be better than an old lamborghini espeically when talking of fighter jets. cars do not indulge in fights but planes do.

JF-17 has BVR and more advance avionics than F-16 1/B so yes until they get MLU, JF-17 is better. It gives pilot better situational awareness, can fire first, has better radar. Only advantage of F-16A/B is more weight carrying capacity.
 
Can F-16 carry anti radiation missiles?

JF-17 can:pakistan: and will be carrying Brazilian missiles inshaALLAH.

so what about F-16
 
For your kind information JF17 is not capable as "FRONTLINE". Second even before MLU i am still rated F16 on TOP in PAF even after FC20!

BLK52 VS FC20 = F16 RULE!
JF17 VS F16 (No comparsion)
 
http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O33ZYaKypAg


stealth u comment is wrong on FC 20 i think FC 20 is one of the best fighter jet in future better than any F 16 till the date made i mean about J10B so take your words back and do some research friend yes their is slight edge to F 16 over JF 17 but it is not like that if JF 17 has good fighter pilot flying it and in F 16 fighter pilot is not that good than im sorry JF 17 willl rule over sky if JF 17 have something lack than better fighter pilot will make its weak point in its stronge point
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom