What's new

Je Suis Scumbag: Charlie Hebdo Mocks Victims of Russian Plane Crash

Hasbara Buster

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
-7
Je Suis Scumbag: Charlie Hebdo Mocks Victims of Russian Plane

…because what's funnier than 220 people falling from the sky? Hardy har har.

Rudy Panko


Democracy's favorite illustrated periodical “Charlie Hebdo” is famous for drawing stupid comics that make people angry. So of course this brave band of Frenchpeople had to mock the 220 victims of the recent Russian plane crash in Egypt. According to Russia's REN TV:

“The first caricature shows flying bodies and the aircraft wreckage falling on a terrorist. The text under the caricature says: “Russian aviation intensifies its bombings,” the TV channel reported.

Ha-ha. Get it?

6mNWxkm.jpg


worldlead_590.jpg


Je Suis Scumbag: Charlie Hebdo Mocks Victims of Russian Plane Crash
 
Je Suis Scumbag: Charlie Hebdo Mocks Victims of Russian Plane

…because what's funnier than 220 people falling from the sky? Hardy har har.

Rudy Panko


Democracy's favorite illustrated periodical “Charlie Hebdo” is famous for drawing stupid comics that make people angry. So of course this brave band of Frenchpeople had to mock the 220 victims of the recent Russian plane crash in Egypt. According to Russia's REN TV:

“The first caricature shows flying bodies and the aircraft wreckage falling on a terrorist. The text under the caricature says: “Russian aviation intensifies its bombings,” the TV channel reported.

Ha-ha. Get it?

6mNWxkm.jpg


worldlead_590.jpg


Je Suis Scumbag: Charlie Hebdo Mocks Victims of Russian Plane Crash

Sick and disgusting, all this should not be allowed.
 
They are not mocking a closer look will tell you they want to express that ISIS brings more trouble for itself by depicting falling debris on terrorists. It’s some kind of abstract satirical sarcasm or criticism. But unfortunately most of the morons can't understand that.
 
Russians outraged after Charlie Hebdo cartoons ‘ridicule’ Sinai plane crash


Published time: 6 Nov, 2015 08:38Edited time: 6 Nov, 2015 19:27


Russians have reacted with anger after the French satirical magazine published caricatures of the Russian passenger aircraft crashing in Egypt. Social media in Russia has erupted in fury at the portrayal, with users condemning its publication by Charlie Hebdo.



One Twitter user questioned why the staff at Charlie Hebdo hadn’t printed a cartoon of the members of their team who were shot in Paris in January. The user added sarcastically, “That would have been really funny for them.”

Others said that people should just start to “ignore” these “disgusting provocations,” as their creators are trying to “provoke a reaction.”


Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the cartoons published by Charlie Hebdo “blasphemy.”

“In our country, this would be called 'blasphemy.' It has nothing to do with democracy or with self-expression. It is just blasphemy,” Peskov said.

“My colleagues and I tried to find caricatures of the Charlie Hebdo journalists in the magazine, who were shot by terrorists. We were unable to find them. But if they were published, then it would also be blasphemy, well at least in our country,” he added.

The concept of blasphemy does not exist for the French magazine, its chief editor said, commenting on the Kremlin press secretary’s reaction. “I don’t understand it. We are a secular, democratic and atheistic publication,” Gerard Briard told the Russian office of French RFI radio station.

We comment on the news, just like all other publications do... There are no caricature characters on these drawings. We are just commenting on the event and show our own view,” Charlie Hebdo’s editor added.

A Russian lawmaker called the cartoon, which shows the plane falling , “blasphemy” and an “insult.”

“I believe it is blasphemy and ridicules the memory of those who lost their lives as a result of this catastrophe. This should not be used by any media organizations in any form whatsoever or in any particular genre in which they may specialize,” said Igor Morozov, a member of the Federation Council.

The first cartoon shows parts of the aircraft and a passenger falling toward the ground, while an Islamic State militant, armed with a gun, ducks for cover to avoid the falling debris. Underneath the caricature is the caption: “Daesh: Russia’s aviation intensifies its bombardments.”

Morozov said that the Sinai plane crash “should not be ridiculed.”

He added: “In trying to be original, Charlie Hebdo have plunged everything into shock. Remember the tragedy which happened in January 2015 concerning the publisher. I think that the journalists are provoking acts of violence.”

The second showed a skull and a burned-out plane on the ground, with the caption: “The dangers of low-cost Russia. I should have taken Air Cocaine.” The authors were referring to two French pilots who fled the Dominican Republic to escape arrest for allegedly trying to transport 680 kilograms of the drug.

Maria Zakharova, the spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, wrote on her Facebook page: “Is anyone still Charlie?” in a reference to the catchphrase “JeSuisCharlie”

The Sinai tragedy occurred when a Metrojet Airbus 321, bound for St Petersburg with 224 people on board, crashed in the desert just 23 minutes after taking off from the resort of Sharm-el-Sheikh on October 31. The investigation is still ongoing, but a terrorist attack is among the possible causes of the crash.

Charlie Hebdo has continued to court controversy since the attack on its headquarters. In August, it published a cartoon after the discovery of plane wreckage confirmed to belong to missing Malaysian Airline flight MH370.



A month later, the publication mocked the drowning of Syrian toddler Aylan Kurdi who died during a perilous journey across the Mediterranean to try and reach Europe along with his family. The poster showed Jesus walking on water with the dead Muslim boy next to him.


The cartoon, dubbed “Welcome, migrants,” featured a gruesome picture of the drowned three-year-old lying face down on the beach. “So close to the goal,” the caption read in French.

The second page was titled “The proof that Europe is Christian.”

There was uproar on social media concerning the mocking of Aylan’s death, with some users describing Charlie Hebdo as a bunch of deluded racists who shouldn’t be called “journalists,” while others simply asked: “JeSuisCharlie now?”



SOURCE:

RT NEWS
 
They are not mocking a closer look will tell you they want to express that ISIS brings more trouble for itself by depicting falling debris on terrorists. It’s some kind of abstract satirical sarcasm or criticism. But unfortunately most of the morons can't understand that.
I was going to express my deep moral outrage, but then read your comment... :p:
 
A professional who has to earn his paycheck by making fun of others, events and religion, is the worst possible disgusting scum on the planet.

They were asking for trouble and they got it. No, this is not free speech, This is abuse of free speech. Nothing is free in this world.
 
One Twitter user questioned why the staff at Charlie Hebdo hadn’t printed a cartoon of the members of their team who were shot in Paris in January. The user added sarcastically, “That would have been really funny for them.”

:tup:

The concept of blasphemy does not exist for the French magazine, its chief editor said, commenting on the Kremlin press secretary’s reaction. “I don’t understand it. We are a secular, democratic and atheistic publication,” Gerard Briard told the Russian office of French RFI radio station.

charlie hebdo is as much atheist as that vile fake-atheist, christopher hitchens.
 
They are not mocking a closer look will tell you they want to express that ISIS brings more trouble for itself by depicting falling debris on terrorists. It’s some kind of abstract satirical sarcasm or criticism. But unfortunately most of the morons can't understand that.
Whatever the case, dead people are not to be mocked about in whatever way! We all saw how Paris cried and begged the world to cry with them when their people died then why this bigotry when another nation faces this fate?

Yes it is abstract however, it is disgusting and inconsiderate! Far below the belt!

Just imagine if your family member was 1 of the 220 who died!

I was about to question the same!
One Twitter user questioned why the staff at Charlie Hebdo hadn’t printed a cartoon of the members of their team who were shot in Paris in January.

Logically speaking, If they find other's misfortune funny then they should be capable of making fun of their own tragedy right?

We comment on the news, just like all other publications do...
Then why did they fail to show any cartoons of their own tragedy?

A month later, the publication mocked the drowning of Syrian toddler Aylan Kurdi who died during a perilous journey across the Mediterranean to try and reach Europe along with his family. The poster showed Jesus walking on water with the dead Muslim boy next to him.

The cartoon, dubbed “Welcome, migrants,” featured a gruesome picture of the drowned three-year-old lying face down on the beach. “So close to the goal,” the caption read in French.

The second page was titled “The proof that Europe is Christian.”

There was uproar on social media concerning the mocking of Aylan’s death, with some users describing Charlie Hebdo as a bunch of deluded racists who shouldn’t be called “journalists,” while others simply asked: “JeSuisCharlie now?”
Disgusting!!
 
Whatever the case, dead people are not to be mocked about in whatever way! We all saw how Paris cried and begged the world to cry with them when their people died then why this bigotry when another nation faces this fate?

Yes it is abstract however, it is disgusting and inconsiderate! Far below the belt!

Just imagine if your family member was 1 of the 220 who died!

I was about to question the same!


Logically speaking, If they find other's misfortune funny then they should be capable of making fun of their own tragedy right?


Then why did they fail to show any cartoons of their own tragedy?


Disgusting!!
when people failed to understand what was convyed blame your education system.
 
There are plenty of ways to convey the same thing and making fun of the dead isnt one of them!

What if 1 of the dead was your relative would you have a different opinion? If so why? Mockery is mockery call a spade a spade!

i agree.

when people failed to understand what was convyed blame your education system.

yaar, these dead were innocent tourists not some talibanis or sanghis. :)
 
christopher hitchens.



Yeah, the typical fanatical Western imperialist warmonger. Atheism does not make one peaceful nor do religions. Therefore, you have to judge people according to their behaviour, morals and values, not their faith or lack of faith. I no longer believe that faith will "save" you in the Hereafter which I do believe in.
 
There are plenty of ways to convey the same thing and making fun of the dead isnt one of them!

What if 1 of the dead was your relative would you have a different opinion? If so why? Mockery is mockery call a spade a spade!
abstract satirical sarcasm or criticism.

i agree.



yaar, these dead were innocent tourists not some talibanis or sanghis. :)
abstract satirical sarcasm or criticism.
 
abstract satirical sarcasm or criticism.
.
Was there no other way of putting it instead of using the dead to earn brownie points?
of the dead? When will they make one of the dead in France for whom they havent made one.....shouldnt the same apply to their own?

SHows they're true to their spirit---they mock everything and not just the Prophet. There is no hypocrisy in them.
So when will they make the long due cartoons of that which happened in France which theytried to get a world mourning day for? :pop: Mock everything right? No hypocrisy?!
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom