What's new

Japan's SDF to have a global military role, report

Aepsilons

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
24,871
Reaction score
118
Country
Japan
Location
United States
a2ceebafc8351af1adcbe3f0efbec3d3.jpg


7ecdd4f7dbf366199bc0760524a6310d.jpg




Japan and the United States will eliminate existing geographical constraints under their revised defense cooperation framework to enable the Japanese Self-Defense Forces to assist the U.S. military anywhere in the world, sources said.

The landmark change in the Guidelines for Japan-U.S. Defense Cooperation means that the SDF’s rear support to U.S. forces in terms of supplies and transport will no longer be limited to “areas surrounding Japan.”

However, given the sensitive nature of the issue, an interim report on the new framework is expected to stress that Japan will maintain an exclusively defense-oriented policy as its basic approach, the sources said.

In addition, the report will likely not specify what actions the SDF will take in assisting U.S. forces around the globe.

Japan and the United States are expected to announce the new framework at a meeting between foreign and defense directors-general of the two allies in Tokyo on Oct. 8. They are slated to release a final report late this year.

The revised framework is intended to enable Japan to secure the U.S. military’s involvement to effectively counter potential threats from China and North Korea.

Tokyo and Beijing have been embroiled in a dispute over sovereignty of Senkaku Islands, a group of uninhabited islets in the East China Sea. North Korea has conducted three nuclear tests and repeatedly test-fired missiles, heightening tensions on the Korean Peninsula.

The Japan-U.S. guidelines were set in 1978 during the Cold War, and were revised in 1997 to prepare for a contingency on the Korean Peninsula in light of North Korea’s belligerence.

The current guidelines discuss Japan-U.S. defense cooperation under three areas: normal circumstances; an armed attack against Japan; and situations in areas surrounding Japan that will have an important influence on Japan’s peace and security.

However, the interim report for the new guidelines will replace these three areas of cooperation with the expression that Japan will provide assistance to the United States globally, the sources said.

The report is expected to stipulate that Japan will support and work closely with the U.S. military “seamlessly” under situations varying from normal circumstances to contingencies. These situations include not only armed attacks against Japan, but also so-called gray zone incidents that cannot be adequately handled by the Japan Coast Guard and police, even though such situations fall short of an all-out war.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s administration pushed a historic shift in the nation’s defense policy when the Cabinet in July approved a reinterpretation of the Constitution. The change was made to lift Japan’s self-imposed ban on exercising its right to collective self-defense, thus enabling the SDF to be deployed overseas to come to the aid of an ally.

However, many members of the public opposed that move, and Komeito, the junior coalition partner of Abe’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party, expressed apprehensions over the shift in policy.

Many Komeito lawmakers remain cautious about expanding the scope of SDF cooperation with U.S. forces under collective self-defense. In addition, the government and the ruling coalition have yet to reach an agreement over what the SDF can do to assist U.S. military.

Therefore, the interim report is not expected to detail SDF activities in collaboration with the United States, such as protecting U.S. vessels. It will also avoid using the term “right to collective self-defense.”

Tokyo is also expected to brief Chinese and South Korean officials on the gist of the interim report to address their expected concerns about the overhaul of Japan’s security arrangement with the United States.

Japan approached the United States for broader defense cooperation mainly because China has been increasingly flexing its military muscle in recent years.


(This article was compiled from reports by Shinobu Konno, Sachiko Miwa and Hisashi Ishimatsu.)


Japan’s SDF to assist U.S. military globally under new guidelines - AJW by The Asahi Shimbun
 
In other words!
You will still serve the US even with a powerful military. :taz:
 
View attachment 115383

View attachment 115384



Japan and the United States will eliminate existing geographical constraints under their revised defense cooperation framework to enable the Japanese Self-Defense Forces to assist the U.S. military anywhere in the world, sources said.

The landmark change in the Guidelines for Japan-U.S. Defense Cooperation means that the SDF’s rear support to U.S. forces in terms of supplies and transport will no longer be limited to “areas surrounding Japan.”

However, given the sensitive nature of the issue, an interim report on the new framework is expected to stress that Japan will maintain an exclusively defense-oriented policy as its basic approach, the sources said.

In addition, the report will likely not specify what actions the SDF will take in assisting U.S. forces around the globe.

Japan and the United States are expected to announce the new framework at a meeting between foreign and defense directors-general of the two allies in Tokyo on Oct. 8. They are slated to release a final report late this year.

The revised framework is intended to enable Japan to secure the U.S. military’s involvement to effectively counter potential threats from China and North Korea.

Tokyo and Beijing have been embroiled in a dispute over sovereignty of Senkaku Islands, a group of uninhabited islets in the East China Sea. North Korea has conducted three nuclear tests and repeatedly test-fired missiles, heightening tensions on the Korean Peninsula.

The Japan-U.S. guidelines were set in 1978 during the Cold War, and were revised in 1997 to prepare for a contingency on the Korean Peninsula in light of North Korea’s belligerence.

The current guidelines discuss Japan-U.S. defense cooperation under three areas: normal circumstances; an armed attack against Japan; and situations in areas surrounding Japan that will have an important influence on Japan’s peace and security.

However, the interim report for the new guidelines will replace these three areas of cooperation with the expression that Japan will provide assistance to the United States globally, the sources said.

The report is expected to stipulate that Japan will support and work closely with the U.S. military “seamlessly” under situations varying from normal circumstances to contingencies. These situations include not only armed attacks against Japan, but also so-called gray zone incidents that cannot be adequately handled by the Japan Coast Guard and police, even though such situations fall short of an all-out war.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s administration pushed a historic shift in the nation’s defense policy when the Cabinet in July approved a reinterpretation of the Constitution. The change was made to lift Japan’s self-imposed ban on exercising its right to collective self-defense, thus enabling the SDF to be deployed overseas to come to the aid of an ally.

However, many members of the public opposed that move, and Komeito, the junior coalition partner of Abe’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party, expressed apprehensions over the shift in policy.

Many Komeito lawmakers remain cautious about expanding the scope of SDF cooperation with U.S. forces under collective self-defense. In addition, the government and the ruling coalition have yet to reach an agreement over what the SDF can do to assist U.S. military.

Therefore, the interim report is not expected to detail SDF activities in collaboration with the United States, such as protecting U.S. vessels. It will also avoid using the term “right to collective self-defense.”

Tokyo is also expected to brief Chinese and South Korean officials on the gist of the interim report to address their expected concerns about the overhaul of Japan’s security arrangement with the United States.

Japan approached the United States for broader defense cooperation mainly because China has been increasingly flexing its military muscle in recent years.


(This article was compiled from reports by Shinobu Konno, Sachiko Miwa and Hisashi Ishimatsu.)


Japan’s SDF to assist U.S. military globally under new guidelines - AJW by The Asahi Shimbun

The article is a bit vague. Can you provide examples of scenarios where this might be invoked? For example, had these conditions been in place 15 years ago, would Japan have sent combat forces to Afghanistan? Or would the support still be limited to a logistical function?
 
In other words!
You will still serve the US even with a powerful military. :taz:

If you mean aiding a military ally in times of need, then yes. Afterall, what's the point of a military alliance when one partner cannot or will not come to the aid and support ?

After reading this article, it seems to me that Japan will contribute a greater military role, from the ambiguity of this report, it seems to me that supply support is only part of the expanded role, but even ground , naval, and air support will be included in the report this October 8th.

I only hope that our side will understand the repercussions if we do decide to send a large expeditionary force to foreign lands. Especially if this is going to be in the Middle East or any such hostile, unstable regions. I have no doubt of the abilities of our soldiers, but I don't want precious Japanese boys' blood being spilled in distant lands...

The article is a bit vague. Can you provide examples of scenarios where this might be invoked? For example, had these conditions been in place 15 years ago, would Japan have sent combat forces to Afghanistan? Or would the support still be limited to a logistical function?

That's what I was thinking when reading this article. But if we are to expand on the 3 points as mentioned, then my guess would be that Japan would not only lend logistical support, but, even combat forces , expeditionary forces. I know this is what many in the JGSDF want, many of whom are trigger itchy right now, and anxious to get some "military action".

On a positive light, tho, this would allow the JASDF, JMSDF, and JGSDF to get some much needed 'real life' combat experience.
 
In other words!
You will still serve the US even with a powerful military. :taz:

Thats the obvious way of looking at it.

To a discerning eye it would appear as the first cautious step for a nation to break out of self imposed exile.

The next steps will follow.

In my opinion its a good step, Japan always had control of its destiny now it needs to show it too. Far too long has this nation remained in the shadows.
 
If you mean aiding a military ally in times of need, then yes. Afterall, what's the point of a military alliance when one partner cannot or will not come to the aid and support ?

After reading this article, it seems to me that Japan will contribute a greater military role, from the ambiguity of this report, it seems to me that supply support is only part of the expanded role, but even ground , naval, and air support will be included in the report this October 8th.

I only hope that our side will understand the repercussions if we do decide to send a large expeditionary force to foreign lands. Especially if this is going to be in the Middle East or any such hostile, unstable regions. I have no doubt of the abilities of our soldiers, but I don't want precious Japanese boys' blood being spilled in distant lands...



That's what I was thinking when reading this article. But if we are to expand on the 3 points as mentioned, then my guess would be that Japan would not only lend logistical support, but, even combat forces , expeditionary forces. I know this is what many in the JGSDF want, many of whom are trigger itchy right now, and anxious to get some "military action".

On a positive light, tho, this would allow the JASDF, JMSDF, and JGSDF to get some much needed 'real life' combat experience.

Such thinking seems to be consistent with that of our best ally in the world (Australia). It would also be a convenient way to learn how to operate with allied forces in case "the big one" happens. A defensive war is not the time to learn how to integrate with allied systems.
 
Well, its time to test out these babies..on enemy combatants. ;)



43cc8a764cf56b7b56f5c75ed939900e.jpg

72a7b2cbe477a714383cabb5b8189438.jpg

71c8b4d7441b5fc6f8237e25be5ee901.jpg

1f918371c7d32deed3cfef8725fa84a7.jpg

2b12a3276c3e7ba0241b4dff6f5dd5c4.jpg
 
Global role, means everybody could taste the quality of Japanese weapons.

05d9aea94de7101d46621dcef36bb52d.jpg
 
Last edited:
Global role, means everybody could taste the quality of Japanese weapons.

Most importantly, enemy combatants can taste the fanatical nature of Japanese soldiers.

:)
 
Most importantly, enemy combatants can taste the fanatical nature of Japanese soldiers.

:)

When Japan exports their weapon, for example to Australia, PH, the Japanese weapons are main characters in conflicts.
 
When Japan exports their weapon, for example to Australia, PH, the Japanese weapons are main characters in conflicts.

Sure, but so are Russian and Chinese weapons. ;)

And of course, American made material.
 
Back
Top Bottom