What's new

Japanese PM Kishida appoints pro-China ally as foreign minister

.
who gives a **** about what you think? your opinion are completely irrelevant,

by the way why fuxking lurking in every china thread if you don't care?

Because he is a trained Soros attack dog, that's why. Has anti-China rabies, trained by the Zog neoliberal media like a terrorist inundated with fake news and lies about China.
 
.
Japan aligning with US is their own decision based on their geopolitical reality.
Many chinese hold the notion that Japan does whatever Washington says,but that's not true at all. Chinese under their state sponsored anti japan lens have become autistic to their own discorrect behaviour toward Japan,same as North Korea. China wants harmony with Japan but on the other hand they also want Japan to capitulate before the issues decided by the party for internal political gain. No state would agree to that.
China should stop the bs about history,31 official apologize has been made ,Japan is the nation that's most vital for the development of China,it provided the technology for base nation building industries ,and funded 60% of developmental loans/ODA for china.US funded like 12 % in comparison.

Japanese aren't attacking /Killing/maiming/Chinese in their land ,US and their allies are doing just that to Chinese.
Japan isn't preventing development of China and growth of their firms ,kidnapping their CEO or funding 300 million USD to slander china in every corner of the world or topple gov that the seen as pro china,US is doing that.
All the trouble,Taiwan issue and bad image that China has to deal with is all thanks to the US.If the politicians still seek political points by diverting public's attention to Japan,they are just doing China a disservice, Japan isn't China's enemy right now,the West is,but y'all are making an enemy out of japan as of right now .

The politicians would be just fooling civilians and wasting resources by attacking Japan over outdated political propaganda,and only sending Japan further closer to USA.
Japan wasn't as close to US in 90s,China pushed it much closer, antagonizing it for local political theater and to fuel nationalism, because they are the weaker and easy target,while China thinks they still needed US back in 80s and 90s .




The red warmongers will come around on their own accord when China realigns itself in their own region of Asia.China have to do nothing .
The tribalism of the west under the leash of US will likely last till US economic and military glory holds unchallenged.

you have some good points there, I think China do seek good relationship with Japan, New thought. But the Diaoyu Island is an issue and in the end Japan depends on US protection and market, so their tilt to USA is inevitable
 
.
you have some good points there, I think China do seek good relationship with Japan, New thought. But the Diaoyu Island is an issue and in the end Japan depends on US protection and market, so their tilt to USA is inevitable
And the island issue is the type of political theater that needs to be resolved. Even if we ignore that the Qing gov didn't regard those rocks as Chinese territory(based on their official map published before negotiations with Imperial japan by qing gov),get real,the era for reclaiming islands,especially from developed nation like Japan is over,China is never getting the rocks without waging a war against Japan.

Linking some rocks that has little of geopolitical value to grandiose political threatre, doesn't pay divident by making an enemy out of Japan .That's simply helping the US and their western allies.
 
Last edited:
.
Where do you see China grow more powerful? In Europe its influence is cut back, Australia seeks distance as well.







Sure. Keep telling yourself that. Even though that is absolutely not true.

Just keep chimping out man. Let's see what happens.
Many Japanese are pragmatic people. They only understand power. When u show them power. Slowly, they will evolve and understand what is your power and start to respect u.
 
Last edited:
.
Japan is not an independent country. It is a vassal state that deserve absolute contempt. Vassals deserve zero respect.
 
.
Japan is not an independent country. It is a vassal state that deserve absolute contempt. Vassals deserve zero respect.
They are independent state but the effect of USA completely defeating them in WWII still haunt them. Remember I say when u show them power, they will respect u?

China is slowly showing more power to convince them. When China become the first country to return Moon sample or beat USA to land first woman on Moon.

These Japanese will realise the change of power from USA to China is coming..
 
. .
Japan considers US-China relations important for world community: FM
Posted at: Nov 16 2021 1:44PM

Tokyo, Nov 16 (UNI/Sputnik) The Japanese government is closely following the development of stable China-United States relations, as they are extremely important for world peace and security, Japanese Foreign Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi said on Tuesday.

On Monday, US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a virtual meeting. The leaders discussed the complex nature of inter-state relations and responsible management of bilateral competition.

"Stable relations between the United States and China are extremely important for the entire international community. The Japanese government is closely monitoring the development of relations between these countries, including the summit that has just begun," Hayashi said during a press conference.

The minister refused to assess Biden-Xi talks, stressing that it was the summit between the leaders of third countries and Japan had nothing to do with it.

Relations between China and the United States have deteriorated significantly in recent years. Washington and Beijing are locked in a trade war, with both countries embroiled in tit-for-tat trade wars. China and the US also disagree on issues ranging from over human rights situation in Tibet, Hong Kong and Xinjiang as well as China's role in the spread of Covid-19. Beijing traditionally denies all accusations, objects to the actions taken by the US and urges Washington to stop its provocations.

 
. .
Fun fact, i dont care. China plays as much role over here as Botswana or Namibia.

Does that mean Botswana and/or Namibia are also controlling some of the most important assets in Greek, like Piraeous port, providing key technologies to Greece and giving aid to Greek people during the pandemic?.
 
.
Does that mean Botswana and/or Namibia are also controlling some of the most important assets in Greek, like Piraeous port, providing key technologies to Greece and giving aid to Greek people during the pandemic?.

China does not controle any port in greece. China is not even able to build anything there since its blocked by hundreds of law suits from local people, slowed down by officials ect. So far China only burned money there.

Aid to a pandemic that was started by China and most likely bred in a lab there?

Beside that Greece is a EU member and needs no aid nor technology.
 
. .
China does not controle any port in greece.

The Chinese company Cosco Shipping now owns 67% of Greece’s Piraeus Port Authority, one of the largest ports in Europe, after Greek lawmakers ratified the sale of a 16% stake in the company on top of the 51% Cosco already held.

Greece also granted Cosco another five years to follow through with investments that it had promised to make as part of its deal to buy a majority stake in Piraeus.

Cosco acquired the 51% stake in the port of Piraeus in 2016, under a Syriza-led government.

China’s influence and operating of the main European ports, The Chinese role and influence has expanded in all “NATO member states”
Published November 10, 2021
By Dr.Nadia Helmy

cosco-piraeus-china.jpg


An aerial photo of the COSCO Shipping Pisces approaches Piraeus port, Greece, on Feb. 15, 2019.


The Chinese role and influence has expanded in all “NATO member states”, especially with the acceleration of the scope and number of giant Chinese projects in NATO countries, as the Chinese government and its companies implemented hundreds of projects in the Eurasia region within the framework of the “Belt and Road” initiative, which is launched by President “Xi Jinping” in 2013. We can highly recognize the Chinese expansion in the European and NATO’S member states, as follows:

The forms of the extensive Chinese encroachment ranged to participate, buy or rent an increasing number of (sea ports overlooking the Mediterranean), some of which are important ports and ports used by NATO. For example, China controls the famous “Greek port of Prius”. It also finances in the highway and railway projects between (the Balkan countries and Hungary).

China relatively dominates (the global maritime arena and the management and operation of global ports), the most 50 largest ports in the world, especially in Europe, there are Chinese investments. With regard to container ports, (five giant Chinese companies in the field of transport) control 18% of all container shipping activities operated by the 20 largest companies in the world, according to data issued by (Dury Company), a Chinese consulting company in the field of shipping.

In 2016, Beijing set up a national giant through (China merger of “China Ocean Shipping” and “China Shipping Company” to form “Chinese giant COSCO Shipping and Container Company”), and “COSCO China Container Company”, which is a huge trading group company that includes (seven branches of international subsidiaries) including (a shipping line bearing the same name, i.e. “COSCO” is known worldwide, a port operator), as well as many different commercial activities in the field of shipping.

We can notice that there are (three giant Chinese companies for shipping and containers globally), which are competing at the NATO’s member states and the world, and all of them are working in the field of port operation, and these companies, are:

(“China Merchants Port Holdings” & “Cosco Group” & “China Shipping Terminal Development”)

All of these giant Chinese shipping and container companies belong to the Chinese state, and even the (main three huge Chinese companies for shipping and containers, vigorously competing with the three major global dominant companies) for this industry of giant shipping ships and containers companies, such as:

(“AP Moller Maersk of the Netherlands” & “BSA International of Singapore” & “Hutchison Ports Holdings of Hong Kong”)

The most amazing thing is China’s control of (the port of Long Beach in California), which is (the second largest container port in the United States of America). As the deal to acquire the “Long Beach Port” by the “Chinese Cosco Company”, through its subsidiary company in Hong Kong, was finally approved to this deal, the “COSCO Group” has become (the third largest shipping company in the world), and it has control over (Kaohsiung Port in southwest Taiwan, and the Port of Long Beach in California).

China has also started to operate its company (COSCO Shipping Ports), which is the main Chinese state-owned shipping company in the operation of the container port in “Piraeus Port” in Greece in 2008. Since then, Chinese companies have expanded in the three largest ports in Europe, as it acquired a 35% stake in (Euromax Port in Rotterdam), and also acquired a 20% stake in (The Port of Antwerp in Belgium), and China also started actual planning for (Construction of a terminal for Chinese containers and cargo ships in the port of Hamburg in Germany), according to what is circulated.

In Italy, Chinese state companies were allowed to manage or maintain stakes in Italian ports to expand exports between China and Italy, according to the announced agreement between them, and (the Italian port of Trieste), specifically is subject to intense interest from Beijing, as the giant Chinese company, called (China Communications Construction) manages some pilot projects in the port in northern Italy.

Another giant Chinese ship and container shipping company in the ports of NATO’s member states, called “China Merchants”. It is a Chinese state-owned company, headquartered in (Hong Kong), for negotiations with the Italian government to establish (a joint venture for the ship and container terminal between China and Italy in the Italian port of Trieste).

But, what is remarkable here, is the rejection of a number of Italian officials of that Chinese deal. The governor of the Veneto region “Luca Zaia”, as the region adjacent to “Trieste that administers Venice”, rejected the Italian-Chinese deal, as he described it in the Italian media by saying:

“The proposed Chinese deal to manage and operate the port of Trieste at Italy carries a new form of colonialism”

The importance of (the Italian port of Trieste for China) is due to Beijing from a strategic point of view because it will (connect the Mediterranean with landlocked countries), such as: (Austria, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Serbia), all of which are markets that China hopes to reach them through its “Belt and Road Initiative”, and thus (the Italian port of Trieste) is the most important station for China in Europe on the Chinese Silk Road, and China plans to make it always open to Chinese investments.

The Italian government also agreed to (contract a deal between the Port Authority in the Italian port of Genoa and China), the giant Chinese shipping company, which known: “China Communications Construction Company”.

The assertions of (the head of the Italian port system authority in the western Ligurian Sea of Italy), which is Paolo Emilio Signorini, the Italian authority that controls (the great Italian port of Genoa on the Mediterranean), confirmed that:

“The Italian Ports Authority is working to create a company in partnership with the China Communications Construction Company to manage and operate the main Italian ports”

Perhaps because of the “American fear of Chinese expansion in Italian ports”, this prompted US former Secretary of State “Mike Pompeo” to visit both (Italy and the Vatican) at the end of September 2020, exactly weeks after the visit of Chinese Foreign Minister “Wang Yi” to Italy and four other European countries.

Beijing has set its primary goal of investing in (four Italian ports) to be among its investments within the framework of the Chinese “Belt and Road Initiative”, especially after (Italy’s announcement as the first European country to join the Chinese initiative of the Belt and Road). China has set its plan to expand its ownership in Italian ports as s part of the Belt and Road Initiative projects. In particular (two ports in the north of the Adriatic Sea of Italy, namely the ports of “Tristi and Ravenna”), after the Italian and Chinese governments agreed within a Chinese plan to compete with the main European ports.

Chinese companies have succeeded in owning actual shares of (sea ports in Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands and Germany, thus becoming an important player in the field of European ports). It is estimated that (state-backed Chinese investors own at least 10% of the total shares of all ports in Europe).

The great success of the “Chinese Cosco Company” in the (acquisition of a terminal in the port of Trieste in northern Italy, and China’s acquisition of Zeebrugge port, which is the second largest port in Belgium), which represents the first real success of a Chinese trading company in Northwestern Europe.

China has also succeeded in (concluding deals with three of the largest European ports), which are:

(Euromax port in Rotterdam in Netherlands, in which China owns 35% of its shares & Antwerp port in Belgium, of which China owns 20% & Hamburg port in Germany, in which China has built a new terminal for cargo ships and containers)

And the most dangerous thing here is that the United States of America imposed sanctions on (five companies affiliated with the giant Chinese shipping and container construction company), which is (China Communications Construction), as a giant Chinese company in August 2020, due to American accusations of the company’s involvement in the (militarization of the South China Sea), according to the US indictment against the giant Chinese shipping and container company.

Through the researcher’s previous analysis of this Chinese presence in the depths of European ports, and the American fear of it by proposing alternative projects to control the “Chinese Belt and Road Initiative projects in Europe and NATO’S member states), notifying that there are many European states have challenged Washington and cooperated with China, so it became clear to us, that there are (American and NATO’s recognition that there are increasing fears of the Chinese attempts aimed at expanding its influence in the European Union ports), which are including as NATO’s member states as well, the European Union, led mainly by (France and Germany), have expressed their reservations about the Italian deal for the operation and management of its ports by Chinese companies, with NATO apprehensive about “the increasing Chinese direct influence on the strategic and important Italian ports on the Mediterranean”.

 
.
Japan aligning with US is their own decision based on their geopolitical reality.
Many chinese hold the notion that Japan does whatever Washington says,but that's not true at all. Chinese under their state sponsored anti japan lens have become autistic to their own discorrect behaviour toward Japan,same as North Korea. China wants harmony with Japan but on the other hand they also want Japan to capitulate before the issues decided by the party for internal political gain. No state would agree to that.
China should stop the bs about history,31 official apologies has been made ,Japan is the nation that's been pivotal in the development of China,it provided the technology for base nation-building industries,and funded 60% of developmental loans/ODA for china.US funded like 12 % in comparison.

Japanese aren't attacking /Killing/maiming/Chinese in their land ,US and their allies are doing just that to Chinese.
Japan isn't preventing development of China or growth of Chinese firms ,nor they kidnapped Chinese CEO or funds 300 million USD to slander china in every corner of the world or topple gov that are seen as pro china,US is doing that.
All the troubles, like Taiwan issue and the bad image that China has to deal with, are all thanks to the US.If the politicians still seek political points by diverting public's attention to Japan,they are just doing China a disservice, Japan isn't China's enemy right now,the West is,but y'all are making an enemy out of japan as of right now .

The politicians would be just fooling civilians and wasting resources by attacking Japan over outdated political propaganda,and only sending Japan further closer to USA.
Japan wasn't as close to US in 90s,China pushed it much closer, antagonizing it for local political theater and to fuel nationalism, because they are the weaker and easy target,while China felt they still needed US back in 80s and 90s .




The red warmongers will come around on their own accord when China realigns itself in their own region of Asia.China have to do nothing .
The tribalism of the west under the leash of US will likely last till US economic and military glory holds unchallenged.
Japanese have always wanted the good of China

Even China's own founding father recognizes that

Mao Zedong thought Japan did the Communist Party a great favour by invading China. Can Hong Kong agree with that?


PRC Chinese should believe in Takashi Kawamura says and resist any "political advertisements" and fully be committed to Dai Tōa Kyōeiken
 
.
Back
Top Bottom