What's new

Japan to Challenge China on Security.

DarK-LorD

BANNED
Joined
May 2, 2011
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
0
NOVEMBER 19, 2011
Japan to Challenge China on Security

By YOREE KOH

TOKYO—Japan's prime minister plans to present a subtle challenge to China at a weekend summit by pressing fellow Asian leaders to focus more on maritime security, a discussion opposed by an increasingly assertive Beijing.

At the East Asia Summit in Indonesia that starts Saturday, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda will greet leaders from the Philippines, India and Vietnam—all countries that have signed new military pacts with Japan in recent months. Though he is unlikely to confront China directly, Mr. Noda's stance underscores his country's moves to expand security ties with neighbors in a region once highly suspicious of Japan's military role.

"We think that it is important for the participating countries to confirm the importance to abide by the international rules to ensure freedom of navigation, especially regarding international law of the sea," Noriyuki Shikata, a spokesman for Mr. Noda, said in an interview Thursday.

While Mr. Shikata declined to say whether Japan's maritime focus was aimed specifically at China, Beijing has opposed having it on the agenda, after a year in which Japan and other nations have engaged in territorial disputes with Asia's largest nation.

The summit follows a flurry of military diplomacy by Japan around the region, including a series of bilateral defense pacts.

Earlier this month, Japanese Defense Minister Yasuo Ichikawa and his Indian counterpart agreed to conduct joint naval exercises for the first time in 2012. In a statement released by Japan's Defense Ministry, the sides said they "recognized the importance of sea lanes and decided to actively pursue consultations and cooperation in the field of maritime security." That expanded a security pact launched in 2008.

In October, Tokyo signed a memorandum of understanding with the visiting Vietnamese defense minister enhancing security cooperation between the two countries. The previous month, Prime Minister Noda announced a new "strategic partnership" with visiting Philippine President Benigno Aquino III to bolster dialogue between defense-related authorities. Kazuhisa Shimada, director of the defense policy division at the Ministry of Defense, said Tokyo and Manila could start small-scale joint naval exercises next year.

"We have not necessarily worked hard enough on such areas until now," Mr. Shimada said in an interview earlier this month. "Given the current security environment, conducting such training exercises bilaterally or on a multilateral level is going to be very meaningful in the sense of promoting regional cooperative relations."

Following decades of near-isolation under the American security umbrella, Japan had in recent years been gradually expanding its ties with neighbors, including many—such as Vietnam and the Philippines—that it invaded and occupied during World War II.

Japan signed its first defense memorandum in Southeast Asia with Singapore in 2009. The moves appear to have accelerated after a September 2010 standoff with Beijing over the contested archipelago known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China.

"A lot of it frankly is because the Chinese have shaken the Japanese out of their complacency," said Michael Green, a Japan expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

The archipelago dispute is similar to others in the South China Sea. The Philippines and China both lay claim to the Spratly Islands, an island chain in the South China Sea that geologists say may lie atop significant oil and gas deposits. Vietnam, which also claims part of the Spratly chain, has likewise complained of China's increasingly assertive approach in the region.

"I think that as Japan has consulted with various countries like the Philippines, Vietnam and India and so forth they're all finding out that they're all on the receiving end of a Chinese strategy which aims at pushing China's maritime sphere outward," said Mr. Green. "That has spurred them towards a more strategic cooperation."

The spreading defense alliances also follow the drafting of Japan's national defense guidelines approved last December, which said Tokyo would pursue "more active utilization of Japan's diplomatic and defense capability." It also was the first time the guidelines, last revised in 2004, raised the notion of fostering ties with neighboring countries.

Japanese officials stress that they envision their role in smoothing regional disputes as mainly diplomatic, not military. Issues like "safety of the sea lanes and freedom of navigation in the region" are "a matter of concern for all of us and this needs to be made quite clear," Kimihiro Ishikane, deputy director-general of the Foreign Ministry's Asian and Oceanian Affairs, said in an interview.
—Eric Bellman contributed to this article.

Japan Prime Minister Noda's Defense Stance to Pose Challenge to China - WSJ.com

Good to see that Japan is coming out off it's old stance of passive military policy.
 
.
too late ,its master already betrayed him,actually in the last 50 years,Japan was betrayed by its masters many times.
 
.
AI-BO808_JDEFEN_G_20111117130311.jpg


According to China, All are bad. Japan, S.K, Vietnam, Philippines, Singapore, India, Australia, Mongolia, Europe, U.S. Only China is good. what an arrogant behaviour of China. Too much of aggression is not good in long run for Chinese.
 
.
China never said they are bad,we all have pretty open channels to discuss issues,there are some issues that we dont all agree with,that's it.that's true that some Chinese dont like Japanes,but other countries mostly have good relations with China,do you mean as long as a country wants to strengthen their national defence,they must target China?
 
.
too late ,its master already betrayed him,actually in the last 50 years,Japan was betrayed by its masters many times.

yeah, u r right.. betrayal in 1971 and 1999, when the poor guys were expecting and needing support the most....

Oh SORRY, u were talking about JAPAN???? I thought......:devil::devil::devil:
 
. .
too late ,its master already betrayed him,actually in the last 50 years,Japan was betrayed by its masters many times.

The question is does Japan need a master? lets not forget they were Asia's only superpower in until WW2
 
.
The question is does Japan need a master? lets not forget they were Asia's only superpower in until WW2

yes,both China and India were being world powers for several thousand years,that' why Japan still use Chinese written language,but the world changed long time ago.
 
.
strained relations with neighbors is not good for china esp if they want to be a world power. too many conflicts can cause hurdles in the way to be a superpower for china & U.S is now looking for the chances to gang up against china.
 
.
China never said they are bad,we all have pretty open channels to discuss issues,there are some issues that we dont all agree with,that's it.that's true that some Chinese dont like Japanes,but other countries mostly have good relations with China,do you mean as long as a country wants to strengthen their national defence,they must target China?

You must be joking... yesterday I saw your post & you advocated fiercely to smoke all Indian cities in ashes, by nukes....

are good relations have only one way route????
 
.
too late ,its master already betrayed him,actually in the last 50 years,Japan was betrayed by its masters many times.

China never said they are bad,we all have pretty open channels to discuss issues,there are some issues that we dont all agree with,that's it.that's true that some Chinese dont like Japanes,but other countries mostly have good relations with China,do you mean as long as a country wants to strengthen their national defence,they must target China?

haha,that's a very ridiculous mentality indeed,lol

LOL -lets understand this...

you start by insulting Japan and then move to an absurd, out of reality statement, that china has good realtionships with it's neighbours in the context of this post, and finally question someone else's mentality followed by kissing up to India , after you have advocated to nuking it here several times?

can you hold on to a single chain of thought that is based on today's reality?
 
.
yeah, u r right.. betrayal in 1971 and 1999, when the poor guys were expecting and needing support the most....

Oh SORRY, u were talking about JAPAN???? I thought......:devil::devil::devil:

You made me laugh actually.

When its hungry then asked for help and then when its just get enough, its will turn back to the helper by saying FU. That's what I call betrayal.
 
.
Japan is too afraid to challenge China directly. That's why it needs cannon fodder.

Japan's demographics, long-term economic prospects, and nuclear radiation makes its future even more dubious.
 
.
Japan is too afraid to challenge China directly. That's why it needs cannon fodder.

Japan's demographics, long-term economic prospects, and nuclear radiation makes its future even more dubious.

Just comparing Japan Navy to China Navy then Japan already ahead of China. Don't you think Japan uses China as a good reason to remove/adjust article 9 of Japanese Constitution to be legally turns Japan to be regular Army instead of Japan Sel-Defense Force.?
 
.
Just comparing Japan Navy to China Navy then Japan already ahead of China. Don't you think Japan uses China as a good reason to remove/adjust article 9 of Japanese Constitution to be legally turns Japan to be regular Army instead of Japan Sel-Defense Force.?

When JMSDF is ahead of PLAN?

All their fancy Aegis class destroyers were just the imported technology from US.

This is like saying JASDF is ahead of PLAAF when they can't even build a proper F-16 class fighter jet, meanwhile their F-2 is just an overpriced piece of crap.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom