What's new

Japan PM Shinzo Abe is Dividing China and India, Claims Chinese Daily

Here is the article refered to

Japan-India ties face huge uncertainty - Global Times



19dec22a-76fb-4a71-a5fa-b717e4b9a26d.jpeg


India Prime Minister Narendra Modi is on a four-day state visit to Japan starting Sunday. The trip is aimed at deepening cooperation in political, security, economic and personal exchanges. And Tokyo looks forward to reinforcing air and maritime military cooperation and increasing export of high-speed railway and nuclear power to India.

As two Asian powers, how the growing intimacy between Japan and India coordinates with US "rebalancing to Asia" strategy and cooperates with BRICS member states will wield direct influence upon regional architecture. Therefore this solicits plenty of attention.

How Modi's economic policy and Abenomics supplement each other is expected to be the biggest highlight of this trip.

Before assuming office as prime minister, Modi led the state of Gujarat to achieve an economic miracle through implementing deregulation, expanding investment in infrastructure, and actively attracting foreign capital. And Abe has been promoting Abenomics with economic reform, fiscal expansion and a quantitative easing monetary policy.

With its reform since the 1990s, India has seen an exploding population, active investment, and infrastructure construction lagging behind economic development. In particular, the previous government provided excessive subsidies, leaving its revenue in the red.

Ushering in the 21st century, Japan has been strengthening its cooperation with India and ramping up infrastructure export there.

During his India visit early this year, Abe increased the official development assistance to India to 210 billion yen ($2.02 billion) and provided a program worth $4.5 billion to obtain orders for Japanese nuclear power firms.

The Japan-India economic partnership agreement took effect in August 2011, since when Japan has become the fourth largest investor in India.

Abe's cabinet has highlighted cooperation in finance and currency exchanges since the beginning of this year. Tokyo attaches great importance to India's vast market and infrastructure projects.

However, Modi is more inclined to attract investment from Japanese firms to help with the manufacturing industry.

Security is another area of cooperation between the two nations. When Abe traveled to India early this year, he proposed beefing up the cooperation between the two national security committees. This time, they will probably launch a "two plus two" mechanism of diplomacy and defense to intensify their collaboration in air and sea.

For Tokyo, the sea lane from the Middle East, Africa and the Indian Ocean is a lifeline, and therefore whether it can gain the support of New Delhi is quite important.

Furthermore, Beijing's improving maritime strategies and the development of China-India strategic relations will inevitably exert far-reaching influence upon Japan's strategic resources, channels and markets. Consequently, dividing China and India has become a key issue for Abe.

At present, Washington has its strategic focus in East Asia, but a potential focal point is the Indian Ocean. Thereby how to coordinate the US "pivot to Asia" policy has become an inevitable conundrum for Tokyo.

Meanwhile, BRICS agreed to establish their own development bank, ushering Sino-Indian strategic cooperation into a new historical era. Tokyo and New Delhi must consider the coexistence of China, Japan and the US in the region when promoting their security cooperation.

As for nuclear energy cooperation, Japan and India should take into account the interactions within the international order.

They have been launching nuclear energy cooperation negotiations, but the key lies in how to tackle the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

India is a nuclear weapon state, but has yet to join the NPT. Japan once suffered the blow of nuclear strikes, and now it has been pushed to the front line of non-proliferation by the US.

Peaceful use and non-proliferation of nuclear energy interact with each other, composing a critical element in the current international order. With changing US-India relations in nuclear energy and Australia's decision to export nuclear fuel to New Delhi, it is uncertain how the two will cooperate.

All in all, the Japan-India relationship, in the context of current international politics, witnesses too many uncertain actors in its development.

The author is director of the Center for Globalization Studies and research fellow with the Institute of Japanese Studies, China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn
 
.
Well that is where you are mistaken.US is conducting war on other continents while the peoples in their nation dont even heard about a war with their neighbours.
Here China is making enemies throughout your neighbourhood.
Crossing Himalayan mountains and attacking on our turf is a joke a now a days.
We can't cross into India, that's what I just said. Our capabilities doesn't allow it, or even close, we need for more projects to finish, and for them to reach aqueduct numbers.

The US's air refueling planes and transport ability won them the Gulf war, by the time Gulf war had started, all of their men and equipment is already in the middle east. Yet, these massive fleets still had tons to do and Americans are still complaining of not having enough.

You might think you don't need it, but these support planes are the star of the show in any war.
 
.
We can't cross into India, that's what I just said. Our capabilities doesn't allow it, or even close, we need for more projects to finish, and for them to reach aqueduct numbers.

The US's air refueling planes and transport ability won them the Gulf war, by the time Gulf war had started, all of their men and equipment is already in the middle east. Yet, these massive fleets still had tons to do and Americans are still complaining of not having enough.

You might think you don't need it, but these support planes are the star of the show in any war.
The main thing is there is no need to go to a war when we can achieve a lot being trading partners.Just look at the volume of trade between India and China right now,it'll soon touch $100 billions.Plus the Indian market is a huge untapped one which is extremely lucrative for the Chinese companies.So if all goes right the bi-lateral trade will soon hit $150 billions between us.Now many here seems to be apprehensive of the CCP leadership's motive but as far as i am concerned neither the CCP nor the Indian leadership will do anything to jeopardize this partnership.Plus the Indo-Chinese border has been peaceful since the last 40 years,not even a single bullet has been fired there.So i think there won't be any war between us as both our countries know their priorities right now.Plus we are actively engaged in bi-lateral talks to solve the border issue once and for all and if all goes right we may even solve that within the next decade...:coffee:
 
.
India and a few other nation uses China as bench mark, but I can honestly tell you, we can't go to war right now, I mean not if we want our troops to have food, ammo and other necessities, and even just to have our fighters being able to make it to destination and be able to come back.

We have quite a few programs aiming for regional complete effectiveness and semi effective globally.


Even if one achieves today China's numbers in transport, attack helicopters and others, the fact of the matter is, it won't be close to enough. Which BTW, none has done up to this point and if the plans I saw was any indication, they also won't in the next 5-10 years and more.


It's not that I'm underestimating anyone, it's just that, compare yourself to America, and see the difference, see how a modern war is conducted and see if you are close.

Then see if I'm underestimating or we all just suck, we just suck less, but still suck none the less.

Dude that's how everyone work... Pakistan uses Indian threat and we use Chinese threat and China Uses US threat...i understand everything neither of our nations going to fight and certainly not for the sake of Japan, US or for Pakistan.... What's remaining between is the mistrust, I hope if the Border issue could be solved then evrything would be k..
 
.
We can't cross into India, that's what I just said. Our capabilities doesn't allow it, or even close, we need for more projects to finish, and for them to reach aqueduct numbers.

The US's air refueling planes and transport ability won them the Gulf war, by the time Gulf war had started, all of their men and equipment is already in the middle east. Yet, these massive fleets still had tons to do and Americans are still complaining of not having enough.

You might think you don't need it, but these support planes are the star of the show in any war.

You have to consider enemies SAM capabilities also.
US target nations have neither credible SAM systems nor its tech for development.
 
.
NOT Sure Why Pain in the A$$ occurs somewhere next to the boarder:

If India have good relationship with JAPAN.

If India have good relationship with VIATNAM.

If India have good relationship with Philippines.

If India have good relationship with Singapore.

If India have good relationship with Taiwan.

If India have good relationship with Bhutan.

If India have good relationship with Nepal.

If India have good relationship with Afghanistan.

If India have good relationship with Iran.

ETC.....
 
.
India and China gain from friendship.. This relation can be the best and the strongest in world..

they need not be like US and Russia in future... they can be like like they were for thousands of years.. close..

anyhow in few decades the fight will not be for earth resources.. the competition will shift to beyond earth.. in that respect India and China fighting together and on same side would benefit whole humanity..

the article is useless.. whether from Chinese or Indian media.
 
.
Two new back to back opinions on India-Japan, on Global Times (Asian Review).. One Hawkish, one conciliatory.
 
.
Our two nations got independence on the same day, infact you claim to have gotten a day before.. Now answer my simple question.

How did Pakistan become a receiver of loans from IMF while India with its huge saharan poverty become a donor to IMF?

How did Pakistan enter into the books of top 10 failed Nations while India into the books of top 10 emerging economies ?

Okie dokie Mr Emerging Economy... emerging for the last 67 years and getting nowhere.

India's external debt rises to $ 440.6 billion

Oh by the way, congratulations on having more poor people than all of African countries put together, something India didn't have 20 years ago. Well done Mr Emerging Economy, carry on.
 
.
Okie dokie Mr Emerging Economy... emerging for the last 67 years and getting nowhere.

India's external debt rises to $ 440.6 billion

Oh by the way, congratulations on having more poor people than all of African countries put together, something India didn't have 20 years ago. Well done Mr Emerging Economy, carry on.

My god you're a moron.

Such nationalism, much pride.
 
.
The main thing is there is no need to go to a war when we can achieve a lot being trading partners.Just look at the volume of trade between India and China right now,it'll soon touch $100 billions.Plus the Indian market is a huge untapped one which is extremely lucrative for the Chinese companies.So if all goes right the bi-lateral trade will soon hit $150 billions between us.Now many here seems to be apprehensive of the CCP leadership's motive but as far as i am concerned neither the CCP nor the Indian leadership will do anything to jeopardize this partnership.Plus the Indo-Chinese border has been peaceful since the last 40 years,not even a single bullet has been fired there.So i think there won't be any war between us as both our countries know their priorities right now.Plus we are actively engaged in bi-lateral talks to solve the border issue once and for all and if all goes right we may even solve that within the next decade...:coffee:

fair, but then China and America has some 500 billion dollars going in between and it's not stopping this tension.

But overall my point is even if we do want to and there are a billion reasons, neither of us can go to war, not enough support. Unless you think 10 tank, 500 men, with a few APCs, and enough Ammo for 5 hours is good enough.

You have to consider enemies SAM capabilities also.
US target nations have neither credible SAM systems nor its tech for development.

Iraq's sam isn't bad, but unless something urgent happens, these support planes will stay in the safe zone, and fighters with oilers and AEWs can more than easily defeat any SAM available today.
 
. . .
Okie dokie Mr Emerging Economy... emerging for the last 67 years and getting nowhere.

India's external debt rises to $ 440.6 billion

Oh by the way, congratulations on having more poor people than all of African countries put together, something India didn't have 20 years ago. Well done Mr Emerging Economy, carry on.

India is an Emerging Nation with a booming Economy, Our external debt would not hamper our growing potential and you will be astonished to know that our debt which are nearly the size of your entire GDP is still within Manageble limits.

Iam not sure if we have a population of poor equal the size of Africa, but Iam sure that we are better than a failed country.
 
.
fair, but then China and America has some 500 billion dollars going in between and it's not stopping this tension.

But overall my point is even if we do want to and there are a billion reasons, neither of us can go to war, not enough support. Unless you think 10 tank, 500 men, with a few APCs, and enough Ammo for 5 hours is good enough.



Iraq's sam isn't bad, but unless something urgent happens, these support planes will stay in the safe zone, and fighters with oilers and AEWs can more than easily defeat any SAM available today.

I have enough doubt about that.Because comparing Iraq with India or Japan would be a folly.
Iraq was a small nation and US is superpower with 600billion$ budget.They can cover entire Iraq airspace within few hours.But in India case we have a large geography with difficult terrain and PRC dont have that much tech like that of US .We have our own SAM system .Unless a genuine fifth gen jet like F22 entering in to India would be a mistake.
And for that PRC need a decade .Then we may complete our advanced AAGrid and FGFA.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom