What's new

Japan Has A New Air-Defense Plan—Ignore Chinese Planes

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
Japan Has A New Air-Defense Plan—Ignore Chinese Planes
Mar 5, 2021,08:00am EST

With around 3,300 fighters, bombers and other aircraft, the Chinese air force has more than twice as many planes as the Japanese air force does.

Beijing has seized on that advantage—deploying fighters and other warplanes to probe Japanese air space at such a high rate that China literally has been wearing out Japan’s own fighters.

After years of ceaseless Chinese pressure, Japan finally is doing something about it. It’s now official policy for Japanese forces simply to ... ignore Chinese planes.

Well, sort of ignore some of them.

Where before Japanese fighters intercepted all Chinese warplanes entering Japan’s air-defense identification zones—which largely straddle international air space—now Tokyo’s planes will intercept only the most provocative Chinese formations.

Defense officials briefed Japanese media on the new policy this week, but it’s evident that the defense ministry began restricting interceptions at least a year ago.

Japanese interceptions of Chinese planes peaked at 851 in 2016 then dropped to 675 in 2019 and fell further to just 331 in 2020—and not necessarily because the Chinese are flying less often.

For comparison, the entire NATO alliance performed just 430 interceptions of Russian planes in 2019.

The high sortie rate has been a problem for the Japanese air force’s F-15J squadrons, which are first in line to enforce Japan’s air-defense zones. The JASDF operates 200 F-15s.

Many of the F-15s are assigned to training flights or are stuck in deep maintenance. In practice, just a hundred of so F-15s have handled up to a thousand interceptions a year.

And bear in mind—fighters rarely fly alone.

Realistically, the JASDF can count on just 25 flights of four planes each to keep Chinese planes at bay across air-defense zones covering hundreds of thousands of square miles.

All that short-notice flying has taken a toll. "I think China wants to keep the JASDF off-balance and reactive, wear out its aircraft and air crew, gain training and keep the pressure up daily," Peter Layton, an analyst with the Griffith Asia Institute in Australia, told CNN last year.

“The in-service life of Japan's F-15J fleet is now almost a decision that lies with China,” Layton added.

The F-15 fleet’s material health isn’t the only factor in Tokyo’s new interception policy. The JASDF is in the process of replacing many of its older fighter—including half of the F-15s—with 157 new F-35 stealth fighters that the military concedes aren’t exactly ideal for ADIZ patrols.

A fighter needs to be reliable, easy to launch and fast in order to catch Chinese planes in the act. The F-35 is none of those things. As F-35s account for a greater proportion of the JASDF fighter fleet, the number of planes Tokyo can count on for ADIZ patrols could drop by half.

"The F-35 is not suitable for emergency lift-off, and it will become difficult to maintain the same system as before,” the Japanese defense ministry told Kyodo News.

The new policy of not intercepting all Chinese planes doesn’t mean that Beijing suddenly is free to do as it pleases in the air space around Japan.

According to the new policy, ground-based air-defense systems and the JASDF’s 21 E-767 and E-2 radar planes will monitor the Chinese formations that the fighter force doesn’t intercept.

 
it's good to preserve airframe hours, China also didn't respond to the daily USAF bomber posturing in near its shores.
 
ok, that must be an exaggeration. But yes US assets are flying almost daily near your shores.

sometimes bombers, ELINT, SIGINT, maritime patrol etc.

even the Australian did it, and no Chinese overreacting

you should go check SCS_PI twitter
Those are reconnaissance aircrafts, not bombers, and they are far from coming to the Chinese shore daily. don't try to mislead the readers. better make comments close to the facts than making stupid wild claims.
 
Those are reconnaissance aircrafts, not bombers, and they are far from coming to the Chinese shore daily. don't try to mislead the readers.
Those are reconnaissance aircrafts, not bombers, and they are far from coming to the Chinese shore daily. don't try to mislead the readers. better make comments close to the facts than making stupid wild claims.
I don't see any of PLAAF jets scrambling when this happens
 
I don't see any of PLAAF jets scrambling when this happens
They don't come often, far from daily basis, they actual come less and less, before 1970's they came above city of Beijing regularly, now they no longer dare. No hard done but the trend is changing, they became less and less confident.
 
They don't come often, far from daily basis, they actual come less and less, before 1970's they came above city of Beijing regularly, now they no longer dare. No hard done but the trend is changing, they became less and less confident.
umm still, China didn't do much against US assets frequently flying or challenging it's ADIZ, Japan should not go for Chinese bait and risks airframe hours to intercept every PLAAF assets nearing Japan.

actually the US is even more aggressive instead of backing down in regards to it's flight rate and flight patterns. here's one doing a clear mock attack against China's naval exercise.
d0c79693-c93f-4ce9-a4cb-b32b0ad19dfd_kofi2.jpg


and PLAAF just sit there and watch.

the airframe hours better used to hone combat capability in exercise rather than excessive scramble.
 
umm still, China didn't do much against US assets frequently flying or challenging it's ADIZ, Japan should not go for Chinese bait and risks airframe hours to intercept every PLAAF assets nearing Japan.

actually the US is even more aggressive instead of backing down in regards to it's flight rate and flight patterns. here's one doing a clear mock attack against China's naval exercise.
d0c79693-c93f-4ce9-a4cb-b32b0ad19dfd_kofi2.jpg


and PLAAF just sit there and watch.

the airframe hours better used to hone combat capability in exercise rather than excessive scramble.
US does annoys China but that's it, we've been fighting them since day one of PRC, they makes noise but when real battle happens, they stay away and watch.
 
US does annoys China but that's it, we've been fighting them since day one of PRC, they makes noise but when real battle happens, they stay away and watch.
yes we watch already, your troops death in the Korean war speaks volumes.

China has no experience fighting a modern war.
 
yes we watch already, your troops death in the Korean war speaks volumes.

China has no experience fighting a modern war.
We attacked them , not the otherway around. we started near the Chinese border and finished half way through Korea, US chief commander was removed by the then US president, sounds pretty good to China.
As for sea battles, in 1974 when we took over Paracel Islands, US seventh fleet just sat nearby and watched their ally south Vietnamese navy sink to the bottom of sea despite repeated calls for help by them.

"During the battle, the South Vietnamese fleet detected two more Chinese warships rushing to the area. China later acknowledged these were the Hainan-class submarine chasers 281 and 282. Despite South Vietnamese reports that at least one of their ships had been struck by a missile, the Chinese insisted what the South Vietnamese saw were rocket-propelled grenades fired by the crew of #389 and that no missile-capable ships were present, and the Chinese ships closed in because they had no missiles. The South Vietnamese fleet also received warnings that U.S. Navy radar had detected additional Chinese guided missile frigates and aircraft on their way from Hainan.

South Vietnam requested assistance from the U.S. Seventh Fleet, but the request was denied. "
 
We attacked them , not the otherway around. we started near the Chinese border and finished half way through Korea, US chief commander was removed by the then US president, sounds pretty good to China.
yup, cowardly attack using so called "volunteers" against an enemy which didn't intend to do harm to you only to be beaten back with massive loss of lives in China's "volunteer" ranks.

the fact that the US didn't nuke you shows that they have mercy and honor, even though China has stabbed them in the back. and the fact that your stalemate victory depends on the US not nuking you shows just how pathetic you are in the Korean war.
 
yup, cowardly attack using so called "volunteers" against an enemy which didn't intend to do harm to you only to be beaten back with massive loss of lives in China's "volunteer" ranks.

the fact that the US didn't nuke you shows that they have mercy and honor, even though China has stabbed them in the back. and the fact that your stalemate victory depends on the US not nuking you shows just how pathetic you are in the Korean war.
They fought a war next to China's doorway and we should thank them? every country which is not nuked by US should thank US? Have you lost your mind?
 
They fought a war next to China's doorway and we should thank them? every country which is not nuked by US should thank US? Have you lost your mind?
cheap excuse, as long as it didn't enter your territory then you should not initiate war, China's success in the early stage of their push against UN troops rely on the fact that UN troops didn't expect the Chinese to attacks , by which after the shick the UN troops manage to stabilize and beat back the human wave of Chinese so called "volunteer".

what happened to your slogan " it another country internal matters"

no, I just never brag victory against a country that show mercy. China's so called "victory" is determined by the mood of the US not to nuke the hell out of them.
 
cheap excuse, as long as it didn't enter your territory then you should not initiate war, China's success in the early stage of their push against UN troops rely on the fact that UN troops didn't expect the Chinese to attacks , by which after the shick the UN troops manage to stabilize and beat back the human wave of Chinese so called "volunteer".

what happened to your slogan " it another country internal matters"

no, I just never brag victory against a country that show mercy. China's so called "victory" is determined by the mood of the US not to nuke the hell out of them.
The result was clear, China achieved her goal of pushing US away from her doorway, good enough for China but not for US. China fought a war with Vietnam in the late 1970's, should Vietnam thank China for not nuking Vietnam? your mind is so messed up in this regard.
 
Back
Top Bottom