Jadhav case: Pak’s vote on ICJ judgment shot in arm for India

[khanmubashir]

Confession under duress is not admissible. ICJ nor anyone said he is a terrorist either. Only Pakistanis call him a terrorist. I mean, we both know how much that means.

He is in Pakistan charged by Pakistan and even his retrial if icj demand is entertained would be in pakistan so we know it means everything here
BTW Confession under duress is not admissible can be used upon ajmal confession and alot of other Indian cases too deary

 

[xyxmt]

my advise to Indians: Kulbashan ko bhol jao
just like US will not obey the judgement, neither will Pakistan
Its Pakistan trolling now

 

[ranadd]

He is in Pakistan charged by Pakistan and even his retrial if icj demand is entertained would be in pakistan so we know it means everything here
BTW Confession under duress is not admissible can be used upon ajmal confession and alot of other Indian cases too deary

Again, Pakistan killing him would be the best case scenario for India. Mothership of terror killing an innocent superior breed Indian.

Well, ajmal the rat was carrying around a AK and killing people. On video, hundreds of witnesses etc. kinda what terrorists do.. so confession was like formality. .

You clearly have no grasp on reality. Wow wow.

 

[khanmubashir]

Well, ajmal the rat was carrying around a AK and killing people. On video, hundreds of witnesses etc. kinda what terrorists do.. so confession was like formality. .

You clearly have no grasp on reality. Wow wow.

Jadov confession too is just a formality deary and if the retrial per icj request happens that would be too

You clearly have no grasp on reality. Wow wow.

 

[ranadd]

Jadov confession too is just a formality deary and if the retrial per icj request happens that would be too

You clearly have no grasp on reality. Wow wow.

Oh wow. You don’t understand English either. Sorry, don’t know your local dialiect.

Yadav. Indian. No terrorist.
Kasab. Paksitani. Terrrorist.

 

[khanmubashir]

Oh wow. You don’t understand English either. Sorry, don’t know your local dialiect.

I am not submitting a thesis just answering a troll
U r already a racist nazi
So Don't be a grammar Nazi too sonny

 

[ranadd]

I am not submitting a thesis just answering a troll
U r already a racist nazi
So Don't be a grammar Nazi too sonny

Did you just string up the most complex English words you know trying to make it a sentence?

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

• Sachin Parashar | TNN | Updated: Dec 31, 2018, 03:26 IST

TNN
Kulbhushan Jadhav's case will come up for hearing at ICJ in February 2019

HIGHLIGHTS

• Pakistan at the UN voted in favour of an ICJ judgement which was one of the mainstays of India's submissions
• Pakistan has voted in favour of a UN resolution urgently calling for "full and immediate" compliance with the ICJ Avena judgement
• The Avena case relates to 54 Mexicans who were sentenced to death in the US without the US authorities having notified Mexico

NEW DELHI: Did Pakistan just score a self-goal in the Kulbhushan Jadhav case? In what may provide India fresh ammunition in the case, Islamabad has at the UN voted in favour of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) judgement which was one of the mainstays of India's submissions before

ICJ
when it challenged the death sentence and denial of consular access to the alleged Indian spy.


India had in its submission quoted copiously from the 2004 Avena and Other Mexican Nationals judgement in which the ICJ held the US guilty of violating Vienna Convention on Consular Relations by denying Mexico consular access to its citizens sentenced to death.


ToI has learnt that Pakistan last week voted along with 68 others, including India of course, in favour of a UN resolution urgently calling for "full and immediate" compliance with the ICJ Avena judgement. After 14 years, the US is yet to implement the ICJ order.


The ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the UN. The

Avena case
relates to 54 Mexicans who were sentenced to death in the US without the US authorities having notified Mexico.


The Jadhav case will again come up for hearing in February, 2019, before ICJ which had last year stayed Pakistan's death sentence to Jadhav pending its final decision on the legal proceedings. India, official sources said, will bring up Pakistan's vote in favour of the Avena judgement before ICJ.


"The question for Pakistan is if it wants implementation of the Avena judgement, which is central to India's position, what stops it from following a similar ICJ ruling in the Jadhav case," said a government source, adding that Pakistan's vote also contradicted its position that the Court had no jurisdiction over the Jadhav case.


The ICJ had also backed India's contention that the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations had been violated by not allowing India consular access to Jadhav. Pakistan though has so far not allowed India consular access arguing in its counter-memorial before ICJ that Vienna Convention is not applicable in the case of Jadhav who, it claimed, was a serving Indian Navy officer and RAW spy.


In his submission, which led to the ICJ staying Jadhav's death sentence, India's counsel Harish Salve had recalled the Court's observation in the Avena case that “violations of the rights of the individual under Article 36 (Vienna Convention) may entail a violation of the rights of the sending State, and that violations of the rights of the latter may entail a violation of the rights of the individual”.


Salve had argued that the Vienna Convention recognized the right of a State to seek redress on behalf of its national in this Court, where the "rights of its national, and concomitantly its own rights under the Vienna Convention are violated by another State".


Significantly, even Pakistan's counsel had acknowledged that there were " parallels of that (Avena)" in the position adopted by India. And the ICJ itself had cited its Avena judgement while ruling in the Jadhav case that the fact that he could apply for clemency, or that no date had been fixed for executing him, were not "per se circumstances that should preclude the Court from indicating provisional measures". The Avena judgement had also come in handy for the Indian counsel in proving emergency in the case.


Like Pakistan in the Jadhav case, the US too had unsuccessfully contended in the Avena case that there was no emergency for no execution date had been set and that there were rules for grant of clemency.


What's the Avena case
The Avena case was about 54 Mexicans who were sentenced to death in different US states. Mexico instituted legal proceedings in January 2003 against the US for the same


As Salve had recalled in his submission, Mexico asserted that its citizens were arrested, detained, tried, convicted and sentenced to death in proceedings which did not comply (like with Jadhav in India's case) with Article 36 of the Vienna Convention.


US raised doubts over ICJ jurisdiction in the case but the Court set these aside and held US guilty of violating Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. It asked the US to reconsider convictions and sentences and allow Mexico consular access


Download the Times of India News App for Latest India News

VIEW SAMPLE
10 stories that matter, delivered to your inbox

TOP COMMENT

Hang the God dammed black Kunjurs Hindu terrorist Kulbushan- I can volunteer myself as a hangman.

Gopal Singh Chawla
READ ALL COMMENTS

TOP TRENDS

• 
  
  
  • Punjab Election result
  • Narendra Modi
  • JKBOSE 12th Result
  • Ind vs Aus 3rd test
  • Virat Kohli
  • IND vs AUS
  • Meghalaya miners rescue
  • Akhilesh Yadav
  • Andaman Nicobar Islands
  • Triple talaq bill
  • IPL 2019 players list
  • Bangalore
  • Kerala lottery results
  • India Budget 2019
  • News

ABOUT US | TERMS OF USE
Copyright © 2018 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd.
All rights reserved.

he is a spy. Thats what indians cant prove otherwise.
we told the world about the arrest. We made the declaration public. Now we can't beg india to allow us use our own law.

 

[khanmubashir]

Did you just string up the most complex English words you know trying to make it a sentence?

Nope
Is targeting my Grammar is only response
u can come up with Sonny
or can u also talk some facts regarding the thread

 

[ranadd]

Nope
Is targeting my Grammar is only response
u can come up with Sonny
or can u also talk some facts regarding the thread

What else is there? As you agreed, Yadav spy. No arguments.

 

[khanmubashir]

What else is there? As you agreed, Yadav spy. No arguments.

Then why r u wasting mine and your time Sonny

 

[ranadd]

Then why r u wasting mine and your time Sonny

Just fulfilling my social karma for the day by talking to the less fortunate. . Love you boo.

 

[khanmubashir]

Again, Pakistan killing him would be the best case scenario for India. Mothership of terror killing an innocent superior breed Indian.

Well, ajmal the rat was carrying around a AK and killing people. On video, hundreds of witnesses etc. kinda what terrorists do.. so confession was like formality. .

You clearly have no grasp on reality. Wow wow.

Pakistan knows that modi is praying we hang him before Indian election so he can sell his death to make bhakts chutya and they give him vote
so I believe kolbosh will be hanged after Indian election so that bjp can't utilize his death
BTW superior breed Indian ??
This is terminology used for animals like dogs

 

[JohnWick]

Pakistan knows that modi is praying we hang him before Indian election so he can sell his death to make bhakts chutya and they give him vote
so I believe kolbosh will be hanged after Indian election so that bjp can't utilize his death
BTW superior breed Indian ??
This is terminology used for animals like dogs

How hanging of Jadhuv affects elections?

 

[ranadd]

Pakistan knows that modi is praying we hang him before Indian election so he can sell his death to make bhakts chutya and they give him vote
so I believe kolbosh will be hanged after Indian election so that bjp can't utilize his death
BTW superior breed Indian ??
This is terminology used for animals like dogs

Mmm No.