MastanKhan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 21,269
- Reaction score
- 166
- Country
- Location
For the first part,your argument is valid. But we should also listen to what PAF has to say.
Secondly,if we wanted to get J10,then we should had never run the jf17 program.
But now, our best option is to invest in jf17.
Nevertheless,jf17 cannot match j10 or f16.Period !
Hi,
The J10C is to compliment the position and numbers of the F16's due to issues---.
Realistically an ideal number of F16's would be around 150 +++. So---if can't get them without restrictions---then we need to find something else similar---.
So---basically you need a fleet of 150 cars----in the honda civic category---but only 72 civics are available---so what are you gonna do----if you cannot find the Honda Civic----what are you going to get---a Toyota Corolla---they are similar utility vehicles with similar size and output---quality---reliability---style and show.
When that size and capability is your need---then why would you say that no---I won't get it---because it does not bring anything new to the table.
The problem over here is not " does not bring anything to the table " but a lack of required machine of that capability.
So---many a members take a stupid pill and start uttering---" it does not bring anything new to the table "----.
When we are looking for getting 32 F16's in the next few years---we are not looking any new capabilities---we are just magnifying our capabilities .
And as J10 is exactly similar to the F16 in utility---we can fill that VOID of the F16's with the J10's----so what is so difficult to understand over here.
The JF 17 has its own utility and should be used within those parameters.