J-10 might not needed as they don't add anything to PAF's capability

[Hayreddin]

over the years since I joined this forum. not musch was discussed about the induction of strike specific aircraft.
our current strike aircraft are old and also doesn't have much payload. may be J 10 can give us something in that regard.

personally I believe that JF 17 and Project AZAM will b our future force but we will need a good strike platform. which can also be used in specific roles such as electronic attack/countermeasures etc.

and J 10 C could fill that gap or some other type with bigger payload.

Jft 3 nullify j10c advantage . Paf should go for heavy weight like Su35 or J16 .

 

[NA71]

Jft 3 nullify j10c advantage . Paf should go for heavy weight like Su35 or J16 .

SU34... just pitching it ....

 

[MystryMan]

A big war is coming within next 5 years. If we want to survive and come out of it intact, we must order 100 J10 class jets now.

Agreed. That's why the need for another platform. Commanalty with sub-systems of JF-17 should make the induction faster and Maintenance/logistics simpler.

Hio,

Let me share something young man---. Any weapon and weapons system that is in chinese arsenal---is available to pakistan---if and when pakistan desires it---.

Just because pakistan does not show outrageous demands on public forums does not mean it is not available---.

Pak military only asks for something that it can utilize to its maximum---because it understands that its own reputation is based on the usage of the equipment---and also the reputation of the chinese weapons is also based on that usage---.

The quiet in the chinese defense indutry after the 27th feb is only on the surface---the quiet in the Plaaf after the 27th is only on the surface---.

The resulting shock waves of the success of chinese weaponry and EW suite on 27th feb has an eye popping effect at the manufacturer of JF17---the SD10's---the KLJ radars & are still reverbrating in those complexes---.

Air forces of the world are wondering at what monstrosity has the Paf unleashed on the enemy---the enemy that they were betting on to take china---.

Now the weapons manufacturers of those nations are in a quandry except for France---. They are wondering---if we sell them weapons and our weapons fail---no one would buy our weapons---.

They are also concerned at what the Plaaf has learnt from the Paf---.

See---the relationship between pakistan and china is not the same as of feb 26th---feb 27th has just completely changed the scenario---.

Plaaf would give its right and left nut to Paf to try and test its most modern weapons against the mutual enemy---. Nowhere else does Plaaf has the opportunity like that---. Defense contractors die for position like that---.

We need a squadron of Growler type fighters, question is which platform will be ebtter suited for this J-10C/D or JH7A?

 

[Muhammad Omar]

Don't want J-10 then go for 2 Squadrons of EuroFighter

 

[MastanKhan]

Agreed. That's why the need for another platform. Commanalty with sub-systems of JF-17 should make the induction faster and Maintenance/logistics simpler.



We need a squadron of Growler type fighters, question is which platform will be ebtter suited for this J-10C/D or JH7A?

Hi,

JH7A for both Growler type and naval strike missions---.