BATMAN
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 29,895
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
Give it a rest now. It is over. Nawaz Sharif has stepped down.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Give it a rest now. It is over. Nawaz Sharif has stepped down.
Batman/Others,
Pakistan was looking up under PMLN, with CPEC underway, it really had a bright future. But IK has chosen to join hands with the enemies of Pak to derail it. Zina is the least of his crimes.
Regards
The only Court that will be able to decide whether or not a person has "abstained" from major sins is a Sharia Court. According to Islamic principles and jurisprudence, to convict someone of zina, there need to be at least four honest witnesses who have seen the actual act of penetration--the penis being inserted into the vagina (sorry for being graphic, but that's the actual Islamic law).
- he has adequate knowledge of Islamic teachings and practises obligatory duties prescribed by Islam as well as abstains from major sins ;
8. Proof of zina 8[] 8 liable to hadd.
Proof of zina 9[] 9 liable to hadd shall be in one of the following forms, namely:-
(a) the accused makes before a Court of competent jurisdiction a confession of the commission of the offence; or
(b) at least four Muslim adult male witnesses, about whom the Court is satisfied, having regard to the requirements of tazkiyah al-shuhood, that they are truthful persons and abstain from major sins (kabair), give evidence as eye-widnesses of the act of penetration necessary to the offence:Provided that, if the accused is a non-Muslim, the eye-witnesses may be non-Muslims.
Its not about my rights. Its about whether a politician and public position holders satisfy the requirements of article 62 or 63 as set in our constitutions. Rule should be same for everyone. If you celebrate the disqualification of others based on article 62 and 63 then you should have moral character and dignity to apply it on yourselves . You all call nawaz corrupt yet no corruption charges got proved it court and here you know imran did zina and shamelessly saying go prove in court with 4 witness who have been watching his physical act with Sita so you guys are simply making fun of Islamic ruling as its literally impossible to bring four witness watching it livedo you know the punishment in Islam for calling someone zani with no witness???
you have no right to call him zani when you haven't seen him. you don't have the right to assume things about personal life of any person.
Why don't apply same logic to others? they are all innocent until proven guilty or corrupt by court ..no? but here we love throwing blind accusations of corruption and even give figure in billionsDude let them just take it to the court.
Let the court decide.
Why waste time on this? Its Imran and his personal thing.
Simple
Why don't apply same logic to others? they are all innocent until proven guilty or corrupt by court ..no? but here we love throwing blind accusations
Even let leave this zina thing. I personally don't care a bit about how many girls he been sleeping with though it may violate article 62 and could disqualify politicians for life but my question to all his supporters is
Will he criticise and oppose the article 62/63 and verdict of judges based on it in same way as he been doing in the past? Would he say same now that it's too ridiculous to invoke Article 62 & 63 ?
If not then he will be hypocrite
did you even read my question in bold?Sure take his DNA trail there.
did you even read my question in bold?
You don't see the irony perhapsDude who cares what he says.
He has a opinion not a decree
You don't see the irony perhaps
If I say article 62 and 63 is ridiculous to be implement on anyone and next day I start celebrating sweets because my opponents become disqualify under same article which I have been opposing then I will become laughing stock and deserve the title of big hypocrite
What sort of retard law definition of Islam is this.... if I was a judge, I would hand the witnesses first and actors later.there need to be at least four honest witnesses who have seen the actual act of penetration--the penis being inserted into the vagina (sorry for being graphic, but that's the actual Islamic law).
Than such courts should not exist in 21st century.DNA tests will not stand in a Sharia Court.
Allegations of zina against an individual whom one has never witnessed committing the act of penetration are in themselves a hudood offence.
That is upto PMLN, if they like to pursue this case or not.In summary: there is nothing PML can do about this. @BATMAN