It's pretty irrelevant F-35 can track Su-35 at range greater than Su-35 can track F-35

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Because Russia being a major power of course has lots of AWAC. And by the way the upcoming A-100 has a monster AESA that can track fighter size targets at like 600 km and track hundreds of targets in 360 degrees coverage. Su-35 has sensor fusion and downloads data from AWAC, more than doubling its tracking range and on top of that enabling it to track hundreds of targets with full 360 degrees coverage.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/meet-a-100-the-super-awac.590318/

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

@LeGenD @gambit @pakistanipower @vostok

 

[Ultima Thule]

Because Russia being a major power of course has lots of AWAC. And by the way the upcoming A-100 has a monster AESA that can track fighter sized target at like 600 km and track hundreds of targets in 360 degrees coverage. Su-35 has sensor fusion which takes data from AWAC.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/meet-a-100-the-super-awac.590318/

i have simple answer for you that F-35 has all aspect stealth multiple coating radar absorbing paint, RAM (RADAR ABSORBING MATERIAL) RAS (RADAR ABSORBING STRUCTURE) RADAR DIFFRACTION FUSELAGE (STEALTH) and Su-35 is conventional jet, F-35 can easily detect/track/engage SU-35 with its ETOS before Su-35 IRST can detect F-35 @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

i have simple answer for you that F-35 has all aspect stealth multiple coating radar absorbing paint, RAM (RADAR ABSORBING MATERIAL) RAS (RADAR ABSORBING STRUCTURE) RADAR DIFFRACTION FUSELAGE (STEALTH) and Su-35 is conventional jet, F-35 can easily detect/track/engage SU-35 with its ETOS before Su-35 IRST can detect F-35 @undertakerwwefan

RAM is not reliable. It easily falls off. Even in peacetime maintenance of it is difficult. In time of real war, maintenance of it is a liability. F-22 service rate more than 70% before anti ISIS battle and soon fell to less than 50%.

Specific to tactical aircraft, the F-16C fleet reported a mission capable rate of 70.22 percent, the just-standing-up F-35A a 54.67 percent mission capable rate, and the F-22 Raptor a shocking 49.01 mission capable rate. While not covered by Mattis’ memo, the F-15C (71.24 percent) and F-15E (75.26 percent) were also below the threshold now sought by the secretary.

https://www.defensenews.com/air/201...-readiness-to-jump-to-80-percent-in-one-year/

In fiscal 2014, almost three-quarters of the Air Force’s F-22 Raptors were mission capable. But since then, the Raptor’s rates have plunged — by more than 11 percentage points in the last year — and now less than half are mission-capable.

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/...sion-capable-rates-decline-amid-pilot-crisis/

So it's better to not use RAM.

i have simple answer for you that F-35 has all aspect stealth multiple coating radar absorbing paint, RAM (RADAR ABSORBING MATERIAL) RAS (RADAR ABSORBING STRUCTURE) RADAR DIFFRACTION FUSELAGE (STEALTH) and Su-35 is conventional jet, F-35 can easily detect/track/engage SU-35 with its ETOS before Su-35 IRST can detect F-35 @undertakerwwefan

So what? You think Su-35 fights alone? Su-35 is always with AWAC. At Syria there are 4 Su-35 and 2 A-50U. Russia fighter pilots never fight without AWAC.

 

[Ultima Thule]

RAM is not reliable. It easily falls off. Even in peacetime maintenance of it is difficult. In time of real war, maintenance of it is a liability. F-22 service rate more than 70% before anti ISIS battle and soon fell to less than 50%.

Specific to tactical aircraft, the F-16C fleet reported a mission capable rate of 70.22 percent, the just-standing-up F-35A a 54.67 percent mission capable rate, and the F-22 Raptor a shocking 49.01 mission capable rate. While not covered by Mattis’ memo, the F-15C (71.24 percent) and F-15E (75.26 percent) were also below the threshold now sought by the secretary.

https://www.defensenews.com/air/201...-readiness-to-jump-to-80-percent-in-one-year/

In fiscal 2014, almost three-quarters of the Air Force’s F-22 Raptors were mission capable. But since then, the Raptor’s rates have plunged — by more than 11 percentage points in the last year — and now less than half are mission-capable.

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/...sion-capable-rates-decline-amid-pilot-crisis/

So it's better to not use RAM.

No one take you seriously on PDF, i am talking about stealth coating or paint that can fall away due to weather conditions but Material which stealth jet fighter made of you're so dumb to understand the differences between STEALTH COATING/PAINT and MATERIAL @undertakerwwefan

RAM is not reliable. It easily falls off. Even in peacetime maintenance of it is difficult. In time of real war, maintenance of it is a liability. F-22 service rate more than 70% before anti ISIS battle and soon fell to less than 50%.

Specific to tactical aircraft, the F-16C fleet reported a mission capable rate of 70.22 percent, the just-standing-up F-35A a 54.67 percent mission capable rate, and the F-22 Raptor a shocking 49.01 mission capable rate. While not covered by Mattis’ memo, the F-15C (71.24 percent) and F-15E (75.26 percent) were also below the threshold now sought by the secretary.

https://www.defensenews.com/air/201...-readiness-to-jump-to-80-percent-in-one-year/

In fiscal 2014, almost three-quarters of the Air Force’s F-22 Raptors were mission capable. But since then, the Raptor’s rates have plunged — by more than 11 percentage points in the last year — and now less than half are mission-capable.

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/...sion-capable-rates-decline-amid-pilot-crisis/

So it's better to not use RAM.

No one take you seriously on PDF, i am talking about stealth coating or paint that can fall away due to weather conditions but Material which stealth jet fighter made of you're so dumb to understand the differences between STEALTH COATING/PAINT and MATERIAL @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

No one take you seriously on PDF, i am talking about stealth coating or paint that can fall away due to weather conditions but Material which stealth jet fighter made of you're so dumb to understand the differences between STEALTH COATING/PAINT and MATERIAL @undertakerwwefan



No one take you seriously on PDF, i am talking about stealth coating or paint that can fall away due to weather conditions but Material which stealth jet fighter made of you're so dumb to understand the differences between STEALTH COATING/PAINT and MATERIAL @undertakerwwefan

These material everyone know how to make. They been making these material since the 1970s. The point is most countries don't make them because like depleted uranium used in tank armor they cause infertility in crew.

 

[Ultima Thule]

These material everyone know how to make. They been making these material since the 1970s. The point is most countries don't make them because like depleted uranium used in tank armor they cause infertility in crew.

WHAT **** YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT STEALTH JETS IS BEING MADE FROM DEPLETE URANIUM , WHAT A JESTER YOU'RE @undertakerwwefan ITS CLASSIFIED MATERIAL MOSTLY CARBON BASED MATERIAL WITH PLASTING COMPOSITION THAT IS HARMLESS TO PILOT, AND NO ONE KNOWS THAT ON WHICH MATERIAL STEALTH JETS IS BEING MADE OF ITS CLASSIFIED BUT ONE THINK IS FOR SURE STEALTH JETS IS NOT BEING MADE OF DEPLETED
URANIUM
@undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

WHAT **** YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT STEALTH JETS IS BEING MADE FROM DEPLETE URANIUM , WHAT A JESTER YOU'RE @undertakerwwefan ITS CLASSIFIED MATERIAL MOSTLY CARBON BASED MATERIAL WITH PLASTING COMPOSITION THAT IS HARMLESS TO PILOT, AND NO ONE KNOWS THAT ON WHICH MATERIAL STEALTH JETS IS BEING MADE OF ITS CLASSIFIED BUT ONE THINK IS FOR SURE STEALTH JETS IS NOT BEING MADE OF DEPLETED
URANIUM
@undertakerwwefan

Stealth coating falls off quickly once a jet is airborne. By the time it's in the air it's mostly gone anyway. So RAM sucks.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Stealth coating falls off quickly once a jet is airborne. By the time it's in the air it's mostly gone anyway. So RAM sucks.

YOU RETARD HEAD STEALTH COATING IS NOT RAM, STEALTH COATING IS LIKE PAINT THAT APPLIES TO EXTERIOR OF STEALTH JET LIKE PAINT, BUT RAM IS NOT STEALTH COATING, RAM IS STEALTH JET INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL
STRUCTURE BEING MADE OFF THAN STEALTH COATING/PAINT PUT OVER RAM @undertakerwwefan

 

[SecularNationalist]

depleted uranium used in tank armor they cause infertility in crew.

Mardana kamzori ka hakeem @pakistanipower