What's new

Israeli sources: Iran missile strike a ‘flop,’ with most missing target

It is not the habit of Israelis to underestimate their enemies' capabilities. Far from it, they usually like to overestimate the risk so they get themselves ready, and also make the US ready to prevent the risk from actually happening.

They always did ...

Israelis said Iran fired 3 shahab-3 missiles !!!

And people give credit to their media ...

And for some reasons ...

Sectarian mind ... Or an *** on fire because we can do something they can't !

For these people everything from shia Iran are false , lie and haram ... Propaganda !

And we received the message ... Asses on fire !

:enjoy:
 
.
Looks like we got an update from Haaretz saying Iran fired 7 missiles and 5 missed.

But Iranian sources said only 6 were fired and 4 targets were hit.
 
.
IDF CHIEF: IRAN'S STRIKE ON ISIS NOT AS IMPRESSIVE AS THEY CLAIMED
BYYONAH JEREMY BOB

JUNE 20, 2017 22:22

Eisenkot rejects politicized criticism of IDF regarding new Palestinian housing.


ShowImage.ashx



IDF chief of staff Lt.-Gen. Gadi Eisenkot . (photo credit:MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)


Iran's missile strike on ISIS in Syria earlier this week was not as impressive as Iran claimed, IDF Chief-of-Staff Lt. Gen. Gadi Eisenkot said on Tuesday.

"Their achievement was less than what was reported in the media. The strike manifested something, but it was far from a direct hit or what they have said," Eisenkot told the Herzliya Conference.



Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.




He said that Iran is striving "to get more accurate rockets" which is "all part of their push for hegemony" in the region.

Regarding the ISIS June 7 terror attacks in Tehran which brought about Iran's Sunday retaliatory missile strike on ISIS, the IDF chief said "the terror attacks were possibly part of the price for Iran's interventions in Sunni states, with ISIS and with al-Nusra."

More recommendations for you
Recommended by



Moving on to the Iran nuclear deal which Eisenkot has previously said has the positive effect of giving Israel a breather from the Iranian nuclear threat, he warned that the breather is only for a "short period.”

“The world must keep Iran from becoming the next North Korea. It must work hard to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon."

He said, “Iran feels its regional power giving Hezbollah $800 million per year…and $70 million per year to Gaza.”

Eisenkot also briefly waded into the massive political battle that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman, Education Minister Naftali Bennett and others have been fighting over the cabinet approving thousands of new housing units for Palestinians in Area C of the West Bank.

With some on the Right attacking the IDF for facilitating the new Palestinian units, Eisenkot declared unequivocally that the, “IDF must remain the army of the nation,” rejecting “criticism which has not been substantive,” but expressing a readiness to “absorb and learn from…criticism which is substantive.”

Next and despite an extensive discussion of Iran, Eisenkot emphasized that, “Hezbollah is the greatest threat to Israel. It has built tens of thousands of rockets…also it has received advanced Russian weapons…Every four to five houses in South Lebanon hides” weapons.

He also connected Qatar’s expulsion of elements of Hamas to potentially negatively impacting Hezbollah and Lebanon. He warned Lebanon from giving Hamas another perch for troubling Israel. Eisenkot said that Lebanon should remember the internal chaos and Israel’s intervention in Lebanon decades ago after Palestinian terrorists were expelled from Jordan, made their way to Lebanon and increased attacks on Israel from Lebanese territory.

Analyzing the current dilemma facing Israel as it and the Palestinian Authority pressure Hamas in Gaza by reducing how much electricity it receives, he said, “we have an interest in Gaza having 24 hours of electricity per day,” but also do not want to pay for electricity which Hamas uses to attack Israel.

Eisenkot also surveyed a number of other security challenges and mentioned that Israel’s defense doctrine and technologies against rockets and tunnel threats were the most advanced in the world.
http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/ID...ISIS-not-as-impressive-as-they-claimed-497455
 
. .
I've only listed a few things, others like casualty success rate, tracking across borders, are things Iran can't really simulate within its own borders.

What is so difficult about tracking across borders? Bear in mind Iran has long range detection capabilities, with some large OTH radars.

By that logic, if Iran's strikes happened, why haven't the international media covered it, or verified the damage?

I don't know. It looks like they were too busy with all the terrorist attacks, elections, US constitutional crises and whatnot.

But they still have covered it, their coverage just hasn't made the headlines.

lack of evidence is not the same thing as something not happening

We have to make out own guesses I think, free from bias. In all likelihood the 1-2 Qiams missed their targets, they are quite an old design and their guidance is not very advanced, hence they have a large CEP.

But I see no reason why the Zolfiqar, which has displayed incredible accuracy, would fail to hit the target, let alone land in Iraq.

Perhaps you're right, but I think I'll stick with my own views, at least for now. Geopolitics isn't stationary, like the target, maybe we get evidence from Iran? Who knows? If that happens, I'll happily say I'm wrong.

Good point, but really we aren't going to get any leaks from Iran's government (it's just not common), especially with national security issues that the government takes very seriously.

If it was 2 years ago, I'd have agreed with you, but in recent days, a lot of verified leaks, regarding geopolitics in the middle east, Europe and NA, have come from unverified sources.

While I don't necessarily take such sources seriously, I don't automatically dismiss them anymore.

Anything from other countries is speculation, since they can't even know the targets. And leaking (rather than propagating) information of other governments isn't really a thing.
 
. . .
Yeah bro, we're desperately lying
iranmissilefaux.jpg

Israel hasn't provided any credible evidence to support their claims of 5 missiles missing their targets. The Iranians said that only 6 were fired. So that 7 number is a mystery.

The drone footage also shows different areas being struck as well as it being two different towns where the 6 missiles were fired at. They numbered the video 1-4 so at least 4 missiles hit their targets apparently.
 
. . .
That's an example of high IQ I'm jealous.
أتحسد الناس على حطام الدنيا
وأنت لأمير المؤمنين جار؟
ماذا دهاك يا ابن خير البقاع
فليس بعد هذا العار عار
:D
 
Last edited:
.
Remember, Iran fired just 3 Shahab-3s :lol: Maybe that will help you sleep at night.

I don't mean to pry, but can you give me a link to the source saying that Iran fired three Shahab-3s?

Even assuming Iran would fire older ballistic missiles for a surgical operation is insane.
 
. .
Your point is bullshit ... Pure shit !

You're either a troll or incapable of simple reasoning. You blatantly refuse the live video stream hitting the targets from Iran, where you can see at minimum 3 targets being hit, but instead by your own admission, you're "inclined to believe the Israelis". The Israeli story is demonstably false, yet you're inclined to believe them.
Okay, let's say 3 targets are successfully hit, what about the rest? Why only show 3, why not show every single missile hitting its target?

This isn't something to get mad over. Even the US and Russia have launched missiles that have landed wildly off mark. In fact, when Russia first launched missiles at Syrian targets, a few of them actually malfunctioned. Again, this is nothing to get angry over.

You can call my point bullshit all you want, but it doesn't change anything. You're literally overreacting over an opinion on the internet.
 
.
What does this photo have to do with the strikes? Nice try though.
It means, they lied multiple times on missile quantity, quality, stealth aircrafts and what not.
This Photoshop-ed image just proves my point
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom