Israeli Jets Strike Targets at Damascus Military Airport, Arab Media Report

[IceCold]

Pakistan has a destroyer in the black sea can that be ordered to show Israel some fire works.

Why would you post an offtopic comment and a nonsensical one? Why would Pakistan enter into conflict with Israel over Assad? This is an international forum, think twice before spouting illogical nonsense just for the sake of it.

 

[nwmalik]

Yeah... it would be lighten-up as a Chanuka candle before it had even entered the Levantin.

good answer to a stupid comment

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Why Israel is allowed to attack other civilians / militaries ?
and when some one else attack them , whole world label it as terrorist attack.

Israel and Syria is at war.
And no, when Saddam was sending SCUD rockets vs Israel, it was not labelled as a terrorist attacks.
Terrorism does not have an agreeed on definition.
Sovereign states are not committing terrorist acts in my opinion, because they are working within the framework
of international law.
Their actions are either legal or illegal, and in the latter case it is a war crime.
If a state pays off someone to do such atrocities, then it makes sense to call it a terrorist act.

So Lockerbie (sponsored by Libya) is a terrorist act,
and Israeli agents killing alledged terrorists hiding in third party countries is violating
the neutrality of those third party countries.

The proper action for third parties would be to intern the alledged terrorists
as any member of a party to the conflict, but as they are typically dressed as civilians.
there must be proof, and even if there is, a third party may be on friendly terms with the accused.

 

[DavidSling]

Lieberman: Israel working to stop WMDs transfers from Syria to Hezbollah
Hours after another alleged Israeli attack in Damascus, defense minister tells EU ambassadors that the IDF is 'trying to prevent the smuggling of sophisticated weapons, military equipment and weapons of mass destruction' to the Lebanese terror organization.
Yoav Zitun|Published: 07.12.16 , 16:02

Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman said Wednesday that Israel was working to thwart the transfer of advanced weapons and WMDs from Syria to Hezbollah.

Lieberman's comments to European Union ambassadors in Israel were made after the Syrian regime once again accused Israel of attacking its military facilitiesearly Wednesday.

"We act primarily to protect the safety of our citizens and defend our sovereignty, and we're trying to prevent the smuggling of sophisticated weapons, military equipment and weapons of mass destruction from Syria to Hezbollah," the defense minister said.


Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman (Photo: Saban Forum)

He reiterated that Israel had no intention of interfering in the civil war in Syria, but noted that "when I am asked, time and time again, what should be the nature of a possible future accord in Syria, I say and repeat that it doesn't matter what accord it reached because in any case, the Iranians and Assad cannot be part of the accord."

The defense minister also told the European ambassadors that cooperation between Hamas in Gaza and the Islamic State's Sinai branch has increased in recent months.

"In today's world, it's clear you cannot count on the international community, and each country should only rely on itself," he said.


Lieberman meeting with EU ambassadors to Israel (Photo: Ariel Hermoni, Defense Ministry)

On the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Lieberman said it would not be realistic or possible to reach a permanent accord with the Palestinians in the coming years because of the extreme positions of Palestinian Authority leader Mahdmoud Abbas.

"That's why the idea of a final-status agreement will be delayed by at least a few years, and in the meanwhile we need to allow for normal life in Judea and Samaria for both Jews and Palestinians," he said.

He asserted that "it's clear today that the settlements are not an obstacle to peace and that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not the center or the reason of instability in the Middle East. Despite that, European leaders continue treating it as the biggest problem in the world."

Lieberman lamented the fact that "at least 500 people are killed in the Middle East every day—from South Sudan to Iraq. It's a lot graver and more important than what's happening in Amona, but you don't see any mention of it in European media."

"It's hypocritical of you to keep talking about the settlements all the time," he added. "I'm waiting for you to start talking about North Korea and Iran's ballistic missiles."

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4889749,00.html

 

[Timur]

so assad get his *** kicked again.. hope some day one rocket will hit his *** and that one of his wife.. this will be the day I will go out and give children chocolate for free

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

Assad need to go. Peace is not possible under Assad government. I think Israel missed the target.

 

[Al-Andalus]

His opposition are worse

ISIS/Al-Nusra and a minority within the remaining groups. Otherwise what you call opposition being worse equals the Syrian people. You are adopting the same logic that Ba'athist's in Iraq had pre-2003 where most of the people (opposition) was considered as either terrorists or worse.

Also the removal of the Al-Assad regime (which has killed many more people than any other party in the war and which is radical itself) does not equal wanting Islamist rule or whatever you imagine. How about returning to the past in terms of previous Syrian governments and regimes where the majority ruled relatively well for the time period? There was a Syria before Al-Assad, you know. Seems that most people have "somehow" forgotten about this. AND even if we assume that all Syrians would magically want Islamist rule or even the majority, this would be their right as a sovereign nation, at least on paper and for all it matters.

So let's assume that Al-Assad wins the war. What will be the costs of rebuilding Syria? Who will exactly be willing to do such a thing? How will people ever reconcile? Will Syria even remain as we know it? De facto this is not the case and likely won't ever be again. How will the Syrian nation accept to be ruled by such a family after the civil war? As if 40+ years of suffering, 5 years of war and zero development was not bad enough.

The world cannot prevent majority rule forever. Not to say that the regime's ideology is essentially dead (Ba'athism). Alawites will pay for their crimes. Mark my words. A good dose of Arab revenge will be upon them soon. Those responsible for the genocide and destruction of Syria that is. If we had Muslim rulers that even had 10% of the intelligence and courage of past Muslim rulers, this problem would have been dealt with a long ago. Millions of people in our part of the world will not rest before this occurs and I do not blame them and we should do everything in our might (won't happen due to idiotic leaders) to help with this.

The only thing that has saved Al-Assad for now is outside interference (read Russia). Without this he would long be gone. I am not even talking about the 10.000's upon 10.000's of foreign Shia volunteers that are now pictured as part of the "Syrian" army which is a nice joke. Small Mongol-looking Pakistani/Afghan Hazaras now pass of as Arabs and Iranians too. A funny world that we are living in.

so assad get his *** kicked again.. hope some day one rocket will hit his *** and that one of his wife.. this will be the day I will go out and give children chocolate for free

Chocolate AND pocket money.

 

[T-123456]

Good job Israel,doing what others should do but dont dare.

 

[BHarwana]

I don't support Assad is not good but Israel is even worse and they have no right to attack a Muslim country they or American are not world police. This western fabricated Arab spring is not in favor of Muslims and Israel must be stopped Muslims both Shia and Suni should unite and fight the actual enemy and provide peace to Palestine.

And why Pakistan should not attack Israel as Israel has so many times helped India when Pakistan and India are at war.

 

[Solomon2]

I don't support Assad is not good but Israel is even worse and they have no right to attack a Muslim country they or American are not world police.

As pointed out earlier, the U.N. Security Council has authorized its member-states to use air and naval forces to attack Hezbollah resupply efforts and related personnel for the past decade.

This western fabricated Arab spring is not in favor of Muslims -

Which parts of the Arab Spring have been "western fabricated"? The election that put the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt? The popular revolt which removed the M-B from power there? ISIS or the war to stop ISIS? Libya's civil war?

and Israel must be stopped

Stopped from what?

Muslims both Shia and Suni should unite and fight the actual enemy and provide peace to Palestine.

The "actual enemy" is who, exactly?

why Pakistan should not attack Israel as Israel has so many times helped India when Pakistan and India are at war.

Well, I suppose by that measure Pakistan should be attacking India's main weapon supplier Russia and India's biggest trading partners China, the U.S., and the U.A.E., and Saudi Arabia since they all help make India rich and powerful enough to war with Pakistan, right?

Good job Israel,doing what others should do but dont dare.

I am surprised at Turkey's restraint nowadays.

 

[BHarwana]

Oh this propaganda will not work with me. First of all ISIS was developed by USA and NATO. Look at Libya in Qaddafi's time and look at it now, do you think this Arab spring was what they want. In Syria USA and NATO are supporting terrorist but they say that Syrian terrorists are moderate terrorist first of all please tell me a difference between a more terrorist and a less terrorist. Israel is killing humans in Palestine, so attacking military is not terrorism but attacking Palestine civilian what will you call that?

 

[TOPGUN]

Pakistan has a destroyer in the black sea can that be ordered to show Israel some fire works.

Keep Pakistan out of this .. and do not troll

Yeah... it would be lighten-up as a Chanuka candle before it had even entered the Levantin.

Keep Pakistan out of this .. and do not troll

 

[T-123456]

I am surprised at Turkey's restraint nowadays.

You know why the restraint,its not the Turkiye it used to be.

 

[BHarwana]

Keep Pakistan out of this .. and do not troll

Pakistan is way out of it but Israel is an enemy to Pakistan and never forget that. And Holy Prophet (PBUH) has said never to trust them.

 

[Solomon2]

Oh this propaganda will not work with me. First of all ISIS was developed by USA and NATO.

Crazy!

Look at Libya in Qaddafi's time and look at it now, do you think this Arab spring was what they want.

I think it would have been more to NATO's and the U.S.' advantage to keep Qaddafi in power, since he changed to cooperation with them years earlier, but the Libyans got tired of their agelong tyrant.

In Syria USA and NATO are supporting terrorist but they say that Syrian terrorists are moderate terrorist -

That's not "western-fabricated Arab spring" but more like jumping in the middle.

Israel is killing humans in Palestine -

Look at the details. Were the civilian casualties morally justifiable or not? If not, who is the culprit responsible? Is it not Israel's enemies who are morally and legally responsible for civilian casualties, either by attacking Israeli civilians or using their own populace as human shields?

Pakistan is way out of it but Israel is an enemy to Pakistan and never forget that.

It is Pakistan's embarrassment that it has people like you who think that way but with open and friendly relations I think Israelis will forget this quickly.

And Holy Prophet (PBUH) has said never to trust them.

Do you recall that the Arabs, with the help of the Jews, conquered Spain? If Arab Muslims trusted Jews then, why shouldn't they trust Jews now? Obviously this part of the Koran was interpreted by Muslims as only applying to the situation it described, rather than meant as an eternal rule. It's like reading the sentence, "See Jane run" and concluding that all Janes run at all times, rather than taking the sentence as a current observation.