What's new

"Israeli Intransigence"

Solomon2

BANNED
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
19,475
Reaction score
-37
Country
United States
Location
United States
"Today, 78 per cent of what in 1917-48 was Palestine under ‘mandate’ is under Israel’s control, and Israel has no intention of quitting the remaining 22 per cent." link

Am I the only one here who sees a problem with this statement?
 
.
"Today, 78 per cent of what in 1917-48 was Palestine under ‘mandate’ is under Israel’s control, and Israel has no intention of quitting the remaining 22 per cent." link

Am I the only one here who sees a problem with this statement?

SHAME ON ISRAEL
 
.
"Today, 78 per cent of what in 1917-48 was Palestine under ‘mandate’ is under Israel’s control, and Israel has no intention of quitting the remaining 22 per cent." link

Am I the only one here who sees a problem with this statement?
In context it means, quitting the claim over the rest of it?

Lets face it, they control all of it. Whenever there is a bombing in Israel, they sit on Palestinian territories for a while then vacate then come back. It's their daddy's backyard!
 
. .
Well technically the Israelis are only back the land that has been theres for thousands of years.
 
.
Well technically the Israelis are only back the land that has been theres for thousands of years.

Not that I am a fan of the Arabs, but actually, that's the most lame technicality ever!
 
. .
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv
 
Last edited:
.
This is my thread! Don't give the Pakistanis any hints - let them find the answer for themselves!
 
.
even carefully drafted bills are ineffective unless passed into law.
 
.


The statement appears to ignore the part of the Mandate that became Jordan. Even after this "error" the statement does not make sense ipso facto.
 
Last edited:
.
xdrive...little the knowledge that you have read history Palestinians didn't come from outer space they lived here for thousands of years whether you call them Palestinians or germanians or whatever they are the natives of that land Jew as called "Bani Isra'il" the people of the tribes that were in Egypt and than migrated and many were from the native land today called Palestine and many more are called Muslims in that land..so technically they're not back they want to divide the land even more consume and take over the land..get it thorough your think skull..
 
. .
xdrive...little the knowledge that you have read history Palestinians didn't come from outer space they lived here for thousands of years whether you call them Palestinians or germanians or whatever they are the natives of that land Jew as called "Bani Isra'il" the people of the tribes that were in Egypt and than migrated and many were from the native land today called Palestine and many more are called Muslims in that land..so technically they're not back they want to divide the land even more consume and take over the land..get it thorough your think skull..

Nope.

Land of Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Islamic period (630–1918 CE) That's when the muslims lead a crusade and took it from the jews.

Then it got retaken, then the muslims took it once again

Mamluk rule (1270–1516 CE)

Ottoman rule (1516–1831 CE)

Egyptian rule (1831–1841)

Ottoman rule (1841–1917)

British Mandate (1920–1948)

End of the British Mandate 1945–1948]

Israel 1948 - current.
 
.
Nope.

Land of Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Islamic period (630–1918 CE) That's when the muslims lead a crusade and took it from the jews.

Then it got retaken, then the muslims took it once again

Mamluk rule (1270–1516 CE)

Ottoman rule (1516–1831 CE)

Egyptian rule (1831–1841)

Ottoman rule (1841–1917)

British Mandate (1920–1948)

End of the British Mandate 1945–1948]

Israel 1948 - current.

Muslims did not lead any crusade and certainly did not rob the Jews of their property or their land.
Your statement is inaccurate.

At the advent of Islam, the Land of Palestine was part of the Roman empire (no friend of the Jews who persecuted them most violently) and when the Muslims and the Roman empire went to war, Jerusalem was eventually abandoned by the Roman garrison and there was a peaceful takeover of the city without any persecution (like the ones in Crusades) whatsoever.
Jews were allowed back into the city as part of this takeover and Christian places of worship were also granted due security by the Caliph.
The Caliph was invited to offer his prayers in the Church by the Christian Patriarch Sophronius, however this offer was declined by the Caliph who feared that this may give reason for Muslims to build a mosque in this place in coming generations. He therefore offered his prayers outside the church.
Such was the takeover which was very different to what Romans did to Jews and what the Persians did to the Christians when the Sassanid empire briefly captured Jerusalem before Islam.

The crusaders were bred on anti Muslim propaganda and despite the holy places being intact there was deliberate propaganda to paint a totally opposite picture to the common Christians that their holy sites were being desecrated by Muslims.
The bloody manner in which the Crusaders captured Jerusalem and the merciful manner in which Salahuddin retook Jerusalem are in stark contrast to each other despite the fact that Salahuddin had a reason to be vengeful, his nobility is what in fact heralds him as one of the most Just and honorable Kings the world has ever known.

Up till the 20th century there was no issue between the Muslims and the Jews as people, they coexisted and cooperated very well.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom