Israel to Buy Three C-130J Military Transports

[Zebronic]

Yea sorry my friend.

But i love to share my thoughts.. diss those people.
USA and Israel.. damn beautiful country with very bad people totally not earned.

And at this indian guy..
depends on you how you take this crazy.. as a word.
Could be both negative and positive.

I love USA,This people are really good...If you go through USA and EU invention and discovery you will find what they have given to the world.They are ahead in almost every field..

 

[Solomon2]

wont israel stop attacking these countries.

You appear to perceive reality very poorly. Israel today has peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, a quiet border with Syria, and no problems with the Iraqis and Saudis (who both sent expeditionary forces to Syria in the 1973 war.)

i dare israel to attack them.

What makes it your dare? Is your butt on the line? No?

Soon they will face countries with PROPER ARMY.
Iran.. Turkey.

Such assurance! Where does it come from?

 

[xMustiiej70]

I love USA,This people are really good...If you go through USA and EU invention and discovery you will find what they have given to the world.They are ahead in almost every field..

with stolen gold and daimonts from africa.
i mean.. they used black people as slave to steal their own things for usa and europe.
take miami as an example.
Nearly 90% of miami is made by drugs money and maffia work.

 

[pak-yes]

In 1973, after the Egyptians and Syrians attacked on the holiest day of the Jewish year and the IDF responded by surrounding the Egyptian 2nd Army in the Sinai, invading Egypt, and closing to within artillery range of Damascus, Israel and the United States cut a deal: in exchange for Israel NOT destroying its Arab enemies, the U.S. would provide enough aid to help maintain Israel as the strongest military power in the Middle East. Cut off that aid and what do you think Israel will feel compelled to do to preserve itself?

The U.S. does not have the same arrangement with Pakistan. It used to, but in 1965 Pakistan abused the relationship, attempting in its war with India to turn its security pact with the U.S. into a license for unlimited aggression against India, even though Pakistani forces were losing! (Don't argue with me, go read the declassified cables of the U.S. State Dept. example) It's from that date that the U.S.-Pakistan relationship began to suffer severely.

Pakistan losing 65 war.Go ask that from Indian Air Force.And are US intelligence reports word from GOD that we should believe them.US did had some intelligence reports about IRAQ also.

And US-PAK relationship had never been a long term relationship from day 1.No amount of BS security pacts can change that.

 

[skyisthelimit]

with stolen gold and daimonts from africa.
i mean.. they used black people as slave to steal their own things for usa and europe.
take miami as an example.
Nearly 90% of miami is made by drugs money and maffia work.

my friend,
how much did turkey steal during the ottomon empire? for how long did ur country commit crimes on other countries? do no throw stones on others house, when ur own house is made of mirror....the way u defend turkish soldiers killing armenians to defend themselves...same is applicable to israeli soldiers....same reason to save themselves.

u guys make a big issue of palestine and its independence...i would like to know how many countries came forward to help them? if your country govt also thinks the same, then please tell me why is your country trying to have a good peaceful relation with turkey, same with egypt....as well you know...

 

[xMustiiej70]

But did we abanon all the regions?
yes!
and at that time it was all about imperialism.

 

[jha]

good for israel they really need these birds...

one thing i dont understand, israel is so advanced in technology then why is it never interested in designing their own planes..i am sure they can give any country very stiff competition if they decide to..

---------- Post added at 12:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:10 AM ----------

good for israel they really need these birds...

one thing i dont understand, israel is so advanced in technology then why is it never interested in designing their own planes..i am sure they can give any country very stiff competition if they decide to..

 

[mrwarrior006]

@Hammy007

what 1965 war has got to do with the US, india was the first 3rd world country to build nuclear bombs, still US wants to supply it with more nuclear tech, US is a snake if you become its friend it bites you.
it is getting the taste of its own by israel lol.

wrong according to me china was

 

[mrwarrior006]

@pak-yes

Pakistan losing 65 war.Go ask that from Indian Air Force.And are US intelligence reports word from GOD that we should believe them.US did had some intelligence reports about IRAQ also.

And US-PAK relationship had never been a long term relationship from day 1.No amount of BS security pacts can change that.

u see war is not oly about air force

there is land and sea as well

 

[pak-yes]

@pak-yes


u see war is not oly about air force

there is land and sea as well

yes absolutely.For navy i think what was the name ya "Dwarka"correct me if i am wrong.

For Army if it wasn't for Ayub khan replacing another commander on Kashmir front with yahya in the process we lost few previous hours we would had liberated Kashmir also.

 

[mrwarrior006]

yes absolutely.For navy i think what was the name ya "Dwarka"correct me if i am wrong.

For Army if it wasn't for Ayub khan replacing another commander on Kashmir front with yahya in the process we lost few previous hours we would had liberated Kashmir also.

in the end u failed to acheive ur objective

 

[pak-yes]

in the end u failed to acheive ur objective

but you should give us points for atleast trying against an 8 times larger enemy.I will Probably start a flame war with my sentence but when you people fought an enemy of your own size you simply surrendered without even a spark of resistance.

 

[mrwarrior006]

but you should give us points for atleast trying against an 8 times larger enemy.I will Probably start a flame war with my sentence but when you people fought an enemy of your own size you simply surrendered without even a spark of resistance.

well our role was not offensive in 1965 like the one in 1971

yeah every country has some loosing moments who denies tat
we need to learn from tat mistake and try improving on them
and it was government policy to back off ,so not to blame military

 

[pak-yes]

well our role was not offensive in 1965 like the one in 1971

yeah every country has some loosing moments who denies tat
we need to learn from tat mistake and try improving on them
and it was government policy to back off ,so not to blame military

how come your role was not offensive in 65?and 71 was a civil war.

See you Blame your Politicians for quitting Assam in 62 so we also blame our Politicians for not taking kashmir in 65 and not keeping bangal in 71.

My Point is even if we did not succeed in our goals we still have the spirit to fight an 8 times larger enemy.But where's India spirit.Can you People only fight a 8 times smaller enemy and be happy,where does your spirit go when you have to fight an enemy of your own size .What would happen if you would fought an enemy greater than you.

And look at us that we have been fighting with you inspite of your being 8 times larger.

 

[mrwarrior006]

how come your role was not offensive in 65?and 71 was a civil war.

See you Blame your Politicians for quitting Assam in 62 so we also blame our Politicians for not taking kashmir in 65 and not keeping bangal in 71.

My Point is even if we did not succeed in our goals we still have the spirit to fight an 8 times larger enemy.But where's India spirit.Can you People only fight a 8 times smaller enemy and be happy,where does your spirit go when you have to fight an enemy of your own size .What would happen if you would fought an enemy greater than you.

And look at us that we have been fighting with you inspite of your being 8 times larger.

in 65 it was pakistan who started it alll,so it was pakistan who was aggressor not india

in 65 ur army were not able to finish the job in alloted time so ur gov had to back off(so unefficency of ur forces),in 71 ur armed force were not able to save east pakistan as it was all out war(s politican did the mistake in bangal) but it was armed forces job to save it.

and dont talk about the spirit if we didn had tat dont u think we would have been on the negotation table by now with china