There is so much misinformation in your post, I don't even know where to begin. Please google around to educate yourself about both PAF shooting down IAF planes -
That just means a few PAF pilots, in pursuit of glory, decided to side with those seeking to make another genocide of the Jews. It does not that Israel decided to make an enemy of Pakistan. Note that not all the Pakistani pilots who could made the decision to battle the Israelis; a number of them, probably disgusted with their hosts, chose not to participate.
Your repeated assertion that Pakistanis are misinformed about Israel is false.
The point in contention was, "Since every time it all peters out to nothing, can Pakistanis grasp the possibility that maybe 99% of everything negative they ever heard about Israel was wrong?"
That may have been hyperbole, but by how much? In article after article I've contested here at PDF, in event after event I read about in Pakistani media and blogs, Pakistanis are at best only exposed to one facet of the truth. That is misinformation enough. Pakistanis can't even travel to Israel to check current events for themselves.
So my claim still stands: I made up nothing.
I have already debunked most of your assertions about Israel's legitimacy using the BBC documentary which clearly shows -
Who debunked what, you or the BBC? I don't recall you actually writing anything, rather you told me to go watch something. I ignored it. My time is valuable. The Prophet Muhammed was instructed to read, not watch videos.
I've pointed out previously to you that the secular, legal, ground for Israel was established by Muslims when the Ottoman Caliph endorsed the Balfour Declaration in the Treaty of Sèvres, reaffirmed when the Mandate was created by the League of Nations, and finally created and recognized by the U.N. in 1947. You have not contested this sequence of events.
Furthermore, if the BBC did what you said - and I'm not saying they did - why would I expect such claims to stand up to verification? You know they have to earn their ticket into Arab and Muslim countries somehow - it's not like the Jewish Telegraphic Agency can have an office in Pakistan or Damascus.
Time and time again, Pakistanis have severely misunderstood or been misinformed about events even within their own country - or else the Taliban would never have been permitted to rule Swat, yes? So isn't it the height of hubris for Pakistanis to imagine that they are certain enough of the facts and can judge right from wrong in a land thousands of miles away? Or even what action is in Pakistan's best interest?
At the height of the Cold War between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. what policymakers worried most about was "miscalculation". It wasn't enough to have a few facts here and there; with the great power of nuclear weapons came the burden of making decisions, for any mis-step could lead to a war of such horrific proportions that the world had never seen before and could only dimly imagine. And such judgment rested on the
interpretation of facts (the meaning of what one side or another did) rather than the facts themselves.
Are you really confident that Pakistanis are up to the task?