What's new

ISIS poster girl from the UK stripped of citizenship! Shamima not welcome

. .
She's still young and there's time for her to change her views. Many people who returned to the UK from ISIS changed their views after seeing the reality there first hand. I guess losing citizenship isn't really earth shattering, sure life in bangladesh may be hard but she got off lucky compared to what Muslim women went through at the hands of the Assad regime.

I don't like the way how some Muslims are gleeful about this though. I wouldn't like if my teenage sister was brainwashed by a bunch of scumbags online and this was the result. If she has only been a housewife as she says then she really hasn't done too much wrong with her own hands.

What happens if she doesn't change her views and decides to blow up something, with herself included? Can the country take the risk? Nope.
Some people have changed but many still hold their views.
Yes she was brainwashed, yes she was young, but she is not now and is a grown adult woman and she is not repentant and still harbours many of the views from ISIS.
Like you wrote her being denied citizenship isn't a big thing she can make a life elsewhere. The big question is which country will take her? She joined a group which has denounced the very concept of belonging to a nation and declared war upon them all.
 
.
This is a clear violation of her basic human rights, Shame on UK regime:

Right to a Nationality and Statelessness

The Right to a Nationality
The right to a nationality is a fundamental human right. It implies the right of each individual to acquire, change and retain a nationality.

International human rights law provides that the right of States to decide who their nationals are is not absolute and, in particular, States must comply with their human rights obligations concerning the granting and loss of nationality.

Arbitrary Deprivation of Nationality
The right to retain a nationality corresponds to the prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of nationality. Arbitrary deprivation of nationality, therefore, effectively places the affected persons in a more disadvantaged situation concerning the enjoyment of their human rights because some of these rights may be subjected to lawful limitations that otherwise would not apply, but also because these persons are placed in a situation of increased vulnerability to human rights violations.

International Legal Framework
The right to a nationality is recognized in a series of international legal instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the Convention on the Nationality of Married Women, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. The issue of nationality is also regulated in the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons and the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees.

An explicit and general prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of nationality can be found in numerous international instruments. In particular, it is worth noting that article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights explicitly provides that no one should be arbitrarily deprived of his or her nationality. The General Assembly, in its resolution 50/152, also recognized the fundamental nature of the prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of nationality.

Statelessness
The 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons defines "stateless person" as “a person who is not considered as a national by any State under the operation of its law.” The exact number of stateless people is not known, but UNHCR estimates that there are at least 10 million globally. In addition to violations of their right to a nationality, stateless persons are subject to several other human rights violations. States shall introduce safeguards to prevent statelessness by granting their nationality to persons who would otherwise be stateless and are either born in their territory or are born abroad to one of their nationals.States shall also prevent statelessness upon loss or deprivation of nationality.

The Right to a Nationality and the Human Rights Council
The Human Right Council has addressed the enjoyment of the right to a nationality and the avoidance of statelessness in several resolutions on “Human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality”:

Past reports
OHCHR Work on the Right to a Nationality and on Statelessness
Through several of its field presences, OHCHR provides technical advice on nationality laws and policies so they are in agreement with international human rights standards.

In particular with respect to the right of women to a nationality, OHCHR advocates for reform of nationality laws that discriminate against women and impact on the enjoyment of rights of their children and spouses. OHCHR report to the Human Rights Council on “discrimination against women on nationality-related matters” (A/HRC/23/23) examines how women in certain countries do not enjoy equal rights with men to acquire, change and retain their nationality and are also not allowed to transfer nationality to their children or spouses on the same basis, which very often results in statelessness. It analyses the negative impact of discriminatory nationality laws on the enjoyment of women’s rights and the rights of their children and spouses, and also includes best practices and other measures to eliminate discrimination against women in nationality laws. The report provides a comprehensive framework for pledges and action towards the full implementation of States’ human rights obligations in the area of equal nationality rights. An expert workshop to discuss best practises to promote women's equal nationality rights in law and in practice was organized in May 2017.

OHCHR supports UNHCR Campaign to End Statelessness. OHCHR is a member of the Coalition on Every Child's Right to a Nationality.

Documents:

Regional Expert Meeting on the Human Rights of Stateless Persons in the Middle East and North Africa (PDF)

https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Pages/Nationality.aspx

Her mother is Bongladesh, so she can apply for their citizenship.
 
.
She been spreading her legs for takfiri, the whore I read her interview when she was asked about the yazidi women, and she answered the Shia also did it. Proved to me that this biatch has learned nothing.

Of course she ain't, she's just desperate now after the ISIS dream fell to pieces.
I do agree with the child being bought back and raised with the grandparents though.
 
.
Of course she ain't, she's just desperate now after the ISIS dream fell to pieces.
I do agree with the child being bought back and raised with the grandparents though.

I think there is a chance that the child could be raised by the Dutch parents of her partner, I think they claim the child also
 
.
Well done boss!
I call him 'boss' because my brother is a police officer. And the fact that his ultimate 'boss' is a fellow British Pakistani is not lost on him and his colleagues.

And I understand your point about the 'choc ices'. But we live in UK. You got to adapt. Or if you really so caught up about being perfect desi there is option of moving back to village in Pakistan and smoke hookah around bunch of of other villagers. You can always exchange your passport. 100s will beg for it.

To progress you need to adjust. I would rather a 'choc ice' who reaches top of the power pole then a ball scatching, ghetto living who drives drunk slappers around in his taxi. My brother is something of a 'choc ice' as he has to to rise up the ranks in the police force and to fit in. But for all his 'ice' he is a pakee at heart. If you run into him he might act all 'ice' but even with that ice he will cut some slack for you even when he is acting 'ice'. You can't change/influence standing on the outside. You got to get inside to bring change. And that requires balls.
 
.
This is a clear violation of her basic human rights, Shame on UK regime:

Love her so much? Ask the Ayatullah to take her in.

I believe life in jail is too harsh a punishment for stupidity.

This isn't stupidity. Stupidity is toe-punting a football into a window. This is an act of war/treason, and now that her side lost she's begging for help.
 
.
Iran can have her. Or Bangladesh as she is of Bangla origin.
Fact number 1: She is a UK being stripped of her citizenship and becoming a stateless person.
Fact number 2: It is a clear violation of the article 15 of the universal declaration of human rights by the UK government.
Fact number 3: She is a British born citizen not an Iranian and thus a British problem, So you're jumping in the middle with "Iran can have her." is irrelevant and with all due respect, Quite dumb.
 
.
What happens if she doesn't change her views and decides to blow up something, with herself included? Can the country take the risk? Nope.
Some people have changed but many still hold their views.
Yes she was brainwashed, yes she was young, but she is not now and is a grown adult woman and she is not repentant and still harbours many of the views from ISIS.
Like you wrote her being denied citizenship isn't a big thing she can make a life elsewhere. The big question is which country will take her? She joined a group which has denounced the very concept of belonging to a nation and declared war upon them all.

They can take the risk. In fact they already do for other young criminals. I had a job before where I had to supervise a 15 year old rapist boy who was under a form of house arrest and who they were trying to reintroduce to society. And let me tell you, that boy was showing clear signs of outright aggression but they were still doing it and he's probably more of threat than this housewife girl will ever be.

It's just a risk which we have to take when rehabilitating criminals and generally the women are far less of a threat than the men.

I don't really like this whole idea of taking away someone's citizenship and I never have. So I'm sticking with my same stance. She was born in the UK and she never visited Bangladesh in her life so she's the UK's problem, not someone else's. It's not an easy pill to swallow but each country should deal with their own criminals rather throwing their problems to someone else.

Well I meant it in the sense that it isn't a big in comparison to what innocent Muslim women have endeared at the hands of the Assad regime or the Iranian backed militias. You know, she has her health, she hasn't been tortured and she hasn't been raped in some dungeon. So she should be thankful in that regard.

I expect they'll want to ship her back to bangladesh somehow bro
.
 
. . .
You bet.

The galls of her. Suck on Islamic State now you b*iatch. Live your dream. She has a lid by some terrorist and now wants my tax money to support her child in UK.


Should have been barrel bombed than survive I doubt she has change at all only want the State coffers and she was used in the geo-political mess of Syria and once her handlers ditch her well your reap what you sow

Okay that was uncalled for. I think she should be handed to Syrian government and face their laws.

Most likely she will be executed by some Syrian dude not a Government for her crimes
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom