Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do Indians get so worked up about the success of our ISI?
yeah NATO is still in Afghanistan forget Indians for the moment
I doubt R&AW has such friendly relations with the CIA.
ISI unsuccessfully against Zardari (Kennedy styles), Haqqanis/Ijaz Memogate, Osama bin ladin**, Mehran Attack, death of Benazir Bhutto and other events in some sort of intelligence failures.
**Everyone celebrated the biggest success OBL raid in 2011 humilating Pakistan in recent New Year Eve.
No, give credit where its due. Major failures by the Army make the ISI successes look miniatue. I strongly believe had raymond davis not been released for at least a year, OBL raid wouldnt have taken place. Releasing Davis was a major blunder by the Kayani n co n punjab govn't, not ISI. Credit goes to low-mid level officiers who do the work but hardly ever make it to the top.
Can you name any other secret service in the world that has made an American Chief of Army like Gen Mike Mullen n CIA chief Panetta lose their pants before a senate hearing?
u didn't get my point, Davis was captured after he killed two policemen, had he not done so, he wouldn't have been arrested, moreover, when pakistan knew that the guy in custody was a spy, what was the need of making his custody public, spies are caught everywhere and no one comes to know about it, so it was the failure of ISI......
OBL raid was definitely ISI failure as they couldn't find him out sitting so deep inside pakistan......
i don't about which senate hearing u are talking about kindly elaborate......
Somehow I fail to believe that the Army was not aware of OBL raid. Why are ground realities so different? We have multiple accounts of residents who all state the same thing that they were ordered indoors by their own military and to switch off lights and to stay away from windows and balcony's. And all this was to prepare for the operation so it is quite evident that Army was indeed aware of such a false flag operation.....the question is, what were they to gain from an operation that devastated our reputation.
NO credible evidence?? Is that why Lashkar e toiba was banned?? It is well known ISI sponsored organization now operating as Jamat ul dawa. How can a few 10 men leave Pakistani coast with bomb and guns so easily and any one can enter in your territory like a NATO chopper. This is NO ARGUMENT buddy!! IF ISI is not responsible what is it doing then? wearing bangles???
Americans are fighting 10thousand miles away from their territory and there is little assistance provided by anyone, only dependent on Pakistan and their own technology. Try that with Indians you will be shown who outnumbers whom. Of course ISI is a good in operation with guns and bombs but really bad in securing interest. ISI duty is not just to get adored in Pakistan but also to make good strategic relations with other country which no where to be seen apart from China.
Is it not the responsibility of your coast guard/RAW/Navy/Military/Police etc. to defend India against intrusions? I guess we all know who really wears bangles now.....and blindfolds too! Mumbai was a false flag operation of RAW. What was ISI or Pakistan set to gain from a terrorist act? On the other hand India was all set to gain as she did. Blindfolds and Bangles!
Well we tried to show you in 1999 but you started crying and ran away to uncle Sam, that wasn't too fair was it? Next time uncle Sam won't be there to save your *** & Inshallah we will finish the job!
Well we tried to show you in 1999 but you started crying and ran away to uncle Sam, that wasn't too fair was it? Next time uncle Sam won't be there to save your *** & Inshallah we will finish the job!
Next time uncle Sam won't be there to save your *** & Inshallah we will finish the job!
Mr. Zaheerul Hassan.
Do you know that you are violating the laws by posting classified stuff?
Do not be surprised if you land yourself in trouble by posting this online.
in a court of law, accused doesn't say that, since your window was open I entered your house and stole the things.
The intention is observed. To terrorise financial capital of India was the goal.
In the court of law the landlord or a criminal is not accused or made the primary suspect especially when the origin of that criminal is in serious doubt. And is it not the responsibility of the dog in the yard to prevent a thief from entering or the owner to secure the windows?
Pretty lame arguments from you, actually.
Are you really serious?? SO a thief is not to be blamed because the watchdog did not prevent him from entering the house.. Does that mean, it was the Pakistani air force and not NATO who are to be blamed for the recent incident at the afpak border since Pakistani air defences could not stop the helis from entering and opening fire on Pakistani posts..