ISI cultivated Taliban to counter Indian action against Pakistan: Musharraf

[suresh1773]

Let's start with some history lessons, since you are so ignorant, you don't even know When Pakistan started it's campaign of taliban support. India started financing Baloch groups in 2005, we started our campaign in 2006. .

Sir jee the Baloch problem has been going on right from 1948 & not 2005. More then 5 wars have been fourght . Balochistan doesn't share any land border with India nor The Baloch rebels come form Calcutta,Bangalore,Che nai or Bombay(now Mumbai). The rebels r locals,Nawab Akbar Bugti,Brahma Bugti,one goes another comes. About Nawab Akbar Bugti,he was once the chief minister of Balochistan & was a very rich person then why did he picked up the gun.

What about the attacks on Punjabis in Quetta,I mean trains coming from Rawalpindi r routinley attacked. Why r the Balochis attacking your gas pipelines,vital istallations every now & then. Are the Balochis mad or is something wrong with them. Why r the Balochis protesting on the streets of Quetta. Why don't u allow the UN to investigage whether Indian is involved in funding Baloch terrorism. I recently saw a documentary on Balochistan on Alzeera.

 

[SamantK]

Yawn! What is new here? Another admission, which we will use to spank Pakistan against and again on the world stage, like so many others.

 

[Bratva]

@Bratva it is interesting that you are claiming that US abandoned Afghan Taliban after 2001 and then restarted after 2005, and unless suggested otherwise, let's assume still does. Then you do accept you have good and bad taliban?
Next implications is you are accepting that pakistan uses terrorists as a state tool for it's foriegn policy objectives.

If Pakistan truly abandoned taliban in 2001, how do you explain airlift of konduz?

US and Pakistan both remained in contact with Afghan Taliban in one way or the other after re-initiation of contacts with them. There is no good and bad taliban, only those who want to reconcile and those who don't. Hence US freeing Afghan taliban prisoners, allowing them to engage in diplomacy through their office in qatar. Allowing China to mediate b/w Afghan taliban and Kabul government. Tactically admitting Afghan taliban would not be targeted if they don't attack america.

Let's just assume for a second Pakistan did helped elements of Afghan talib in kunduz airlift. Then we have to admit, those afghan talibs who are involved in negotiating with US belong to same cadre of kunduz group. Wiping them would have left america stuck forever at war with Talibs which America is dearly avoiding.

Sir jee the Baloch problem has been going on right from 1948 & not 2005. More then 5 wars have been fourght . Balochistan doesn't share any land border with India nor The Baloch rebels come form Calcutta,Bangalore,Che nai or Bombay(now Mumbai). The rebels r locals,Nawab Akbar Bugti,Brahma Bugti,one goes another comes. About Nawab Akbar Bugti,he was once the chief minister of Balochistan & was a very rich person then why did he picked up the gun.

What about the attacks on Punjabis in Quetta,I mean trains coming from Rawalpindi r routinley attacked. Why r the Balochis attacking your gas pipelines,vital istallations every now & then. Are the Balochis mad or is something wrong with them. Why r the Balochis protesting on the streets of Quetta. Why don't u allow the UN to investigage whether Indian is involved in funding Baloch terrorism. I recently saw a documentary on Balochistan on Alzeera.

The problem with foreign funding is, the war that could have been contained or quarantined or eliminated lingers on for years to come. Compare example of Kashmir insurgency in 90's and in 2000's when support dried up

 

[MilSpec]

Let's just assume for a second Pakistan did helped elements of Afghan talib in kunduz airlift. Then we have to admit, those afghan talibs who are involved in negotiating with US belong to same cadre of kunduz group. Wiping them would have left america stuck forever at war with Talibs which America is dearly avoiding.

Very interesting and and a very valid... Why doesn't pakistan push the fact and leverage this by revealing the list of people, atleast the taliban interlocutors if not all from the konduz air lift.

 

[Bratva]

Very interesting and and a very valid... Why doesn't pakistan push the fact and leverage this by revealing the list of people, atleast the taliban interlocutors if not all from the konduz air lift.

For several reasons. Revealing names would get them assassinated. one example is of Dr Nasiruddin Haqqani and negotiations are occuring b/w america andafghan talibs and it is prerogative of these two parties to disclose any names involved. Not of Pakistan.