What's new

Is CPEC the next East India company ?

what I posted are latest and correct facts.
And its a fact
As of date, 1022 Indus valley sites have been found 616 are in India. Only 406 are in Pakistan.
The biggest Indus valley city Rakhigarhi is in India
Sorry to bust your bubble... but this is the hard truth The biggest and most advanced site is Rakhigarhi that is located in Harayan near to delhi than to Indus waters in pakistan.





Please provide a link to genuine, reliable and irrefutable evidence to your claims. If not it means you are lying.

I dont want to burst another bubble of urs and this is hilarious what u have posted china has nothing of value in western occupied parts of east turkmenistan or Tibbet. China will just use pakistan as a captive market for whatever they can possibly manufacture in east turkmenistan. In other words whatever pakistani industry is left will die down slowly the control of resources will be shifted to chinese as debt will keep on increasing pakistan will soon start leasing chinese everything chinese built under cpec for 100 years and will charge hefty amount if any regular pakistani wants to use those facilities





Lol..........so says the person who belongs to the race and nation that calls for the destruction of the Pakistani race and nation................:azn:

You know Pakistan must be doing something very right when those that call and work for our annihilation are all of a sudden concerned with our economic well-being...........:lol:

This is damning evidence that CPEC has rattled our enemies...........:azn:
 
.
As of date, 1022 Indus valley sites have been found


616 are in India. Only 406 are in Pakistan.


The biggest Indus valley city Rakhigarhi is in India


Sorry to bust your bubble

Indus Valley Civilization is a Pakistani Heritage, Not Indian
During the entire over 9000 years of history of Indus Valley
Civilization, it was only on three different occasions that its
landmass was politically unified with that of Ganges Valley, its tributaries and adjoining plains. This was only during the period of Mauryan Empire, Muslim Empire, and the British Empire. For the remaining almost over 8000 years of its history, the Indus Valley Civilization remained a separate entity.
Therefore, there was much history and geography behind the creation of a separate Muslim state anchored in the subcontinent's northwest, abutting southern Central Asia. Muslim advent in South Asia began with the concept of al-Hind, the Arabic word for India. Al-Hind invokes the vast tracts of the northern and northwestern parts of the Indian subcontinent that came under a mainly Turko-Islamic rule in the Middle Ages and were protected from the horse-borne Mongols by lack of sufficient pastureland. To the extent that one area was the ganglion of this Muslim civilization, it was today's modern-day Pakistan.

Rather than a fake modern creation, Pakistan is the very geographical and national embodiment of all the Muslim invasions that have swept down into India throughout its history, even as Pakistan's southwest is the subcontinental region first occupied by Muslim Arabs invading from the Middle East. The Indus, much more than the Ganges, has always had an organic relationship with the Arab, Persian, and Turkic worlds. It is historically and geographically appropriate that the Indus Valley Civilization, long ago a satrapy of Achaemenid Persia and the forward bastion of Alexander the Great's Near Eastern empire, was always a separate entity as compared to the rest of India.

The more one reads this history, the more it becomes apparent that the Indian subcontinent has two principal geographical regions: the Indus Valley with its tributaries, and the Ganges Valley with its tributaries.
Aitzaz Ahsan, a Pakistani writer, lawyer, and a politician identify the actual geographical fissure within the subcontinent as the "Gurdaspur-Kathiawar salient," a line running from eastern Punjab southwest to the Arabian Sea in Gujarat. This is the watershed, and it matches up almost perfectly with today’s Pakistan-India border. Nearly all the Indus tributaries fall to the west of this line, and all the Ganges tributaries fall to the east. Only the Mauryas, Muslims, and British bonded these two regions into single states.
For the overwhelming majority of history, when one empire did not rule both the entire Indus and the entire Ganges, the southern and eastern parts of Afghanistan, most of Pakistan, and northwestern India were nevertheless all governed as one political unit. And the rich and populous Indus Valley, as close to the Central Asian frontier as it was, formed the pulsating imperial center of that unit.
The genetic studies of people living in Pakistan also confirm that they are genetically more closer to the people from Western Asia than the people of present-day India.
It has also been proven that the people of IVC, even after their decline, did not just vanish but remained in the same areas. As the core of Indus Valley Civilization remains in Pakistan, a large majority of the people of Pakistan are the direct decedents of the people of IVC and have little genetic commonality between the people of current day India.
And therefore, it is the people of Pakistan, who are the heirs of and also hold the cradle of this great civilization and not Indians.Any how,Pakistan was formed on the basis of religion. The idea was that Islam as a political tool is sufficient to bind a country without the need to integrate regional identities. India on the other hand, took a different approach but that approach not working well with minorities peoples in india.
 
Last edited:
.
what is this type of language you are talking....
i was not a history student but still i am 100% sure ...thats this language was not the part of indus civilization...



very abusive........
because he called @Kaptaan a cabbie driver.

which is semi racist, assuming all Pakistani expatriates are cabbie drivers.
 
Last edited:
.
haha archeologists dont care about opinion of random ill educated pakistanis they care about the facts, and facts tell us
As of date, 1022 Indus valley sites have been found
616 are in India. Only 406 are in Pakistan.
The biggest Indus valley city Rakhigarhi is in India

so everytime u or ur cabbie friend starts on wild donkey ride of wrongful facts just keep in mind the above facts.

Behold the absolute idiocy and insecurity of Indians.

Here is an interesting quote you can find online:
After India's independence, both the major Harappan cities together with the Indus became a part of Pakistan and Indian archaeologists were compelled to intensify the search for Harappan sites in India

Yes, these insecure people felt forced to dig up half of their western front in order to label every pot, bangle and literal shithole as an "IVC site". Despite turning it into a mindless idiotic numbers game, Harappa and Mohenjo Daro are still the only defining CITIES of the Indus.
 
.
Actually it is you who is wrong. You can believe whatever you want, but facts remain that Indus river valley civilization happened mostly in Pakistan and hence most indus river valley sites happened in Pakistan.

Nor do Pakistanis give a damn about your incorrect opinions or views.

This is where we disagree. Haha. Get lost now before you anger the mods here.


CPEC is a blessing for Pakistan and China. This will help industrialize Pakistan you blind fool.
Lol haha

CPEC will help China reach Europe, Middle East, and African markets even faster than going through malacca straits.
CPEC will also make Pakistan, western China and Afghanistan more safe and stable.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom