Mithridates
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 2,897
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are rumors that there is a contract worth $7 billion of Su-35's for an unknown customer.
confirmed
That is a lot of money no matter how you look at it.
Iran signed a contract to buy SU-35?confirmed
we have no choice
the only country which has such long range fighter with high end technology is Russia,
China is out of picture our technological manufacturing has same level but better quality than China so...
even if U.S offer us F-16 it is point less because of we need long range high altitude fighter high speed which can carry heavy payload
in another word nuclear striker, we are using SU-24 at monent as reaction force so ........
so we have no other choise
We have learnt in history, many times, that russia is a very unraliable partner, they cheated many times on Iran
if I'm not wrong China bought twelve of it for two billions. so with seven we can buy 42...seems like we got some kind of discount.67 costs 7 billion..??
or they included armaments and refueling tankers.
PEED, you have always praised the unconventional and innovative and cost efficient way sepah has achieved strategic military goals. For bombing and surveillance we have now efficiently replaced the need of manned aircraft with various types of missiles, rockets and other unmanned systems. Isn’t the best option to keep investing in domestic production and produce an unmanned multi Mach interceptor? We have all technological enablers on high TRLs. Personally I hope to never see Iran wasting billions on buying off the shelf legacy systems.4 Su-35 squadrons are needed at the Esfahan airbase in the center of Iran.
They have the range to reach any area in Iran where IADS is under such pressure that support in necessary.
They need to fly from the central airbase with max. distance from dangerous border regions very fast to any border region. They need to have Russian air to air weapons, as well as long range BVR weapons such as the Masqood (follow on to the Fakkur).
Just take away the force from a U.S concentrated airpower attack on an IADS front sector at superior speeds and fuel reserves.
Two more squadrons for Hamedan for Tehran protection would not be bad too.
PEED, you have always praised the unconventional and innovative and cost efficient way sepah has achieved strategic military goals. For bombing and surveillance we have now efficiently replaced the need of manned aircraft with various types of missiles, rockets and other unmanned systems. Isn’t the best option to keep investing in domestic production and produce an unmanned multi Mach interceptor? We have all technological enablers on high TRLs. Personally I hope to never see Iran wasting billions on buying off the shelf legacy systems.
we have no choice
the only country which has such long range fighter with high end technology is Russia,
China is out of picture our technological manufacturing has same level but better quality than China so...
even if U.S offer us F-16 it is point less because of we need long range high altitude fighter high speed which can carry heavy payload
in another word nuclear striker, we are using SU-24 at monent as reaction force so ........
so we have no other choise
PEED, you have always praised the unconventional and innovative and cost efficient way sepah has achieved strategic military goals. For bombing and surveillance we have now efficiently replaced the need of manned aircraft with various types of missiles, rockets and other unmanned systems. Isn’t the best option to keep investing in domestic production and produce an unmanned multi Mach interceptor? We have all technological enablers on high TRLs. Personally I hope to never see Iran wasting billions on buying off the shelf legacy systems.