Iran's S-200 & TOR Missile an ample defence

[gambit]

F117 was downed by low passive radars ? I think b52 are preety old now and most militaryies know how to counter them. But one thing can I ask of the miltary professionals how high do b52 would fly to hit SAM sites?

The 'military professionals' have debunked this nonsense over and over and over and over...And yet people like you still occasionally bring it up. So why should you bother to ask anything of them anyway?

 

[zagahaga]

If you debunk it then tell me how if you can't then bye bye

 

[Thomas]

F117 was downed by low passive radars ? I think b52 are preety old now and most militaryies know how to counter them. But one thing can I ask of the miltary professionals how high do b52 would fly to hit SAM sites?

B-52's are only used these days when the U.S. has complete superiority. Any strike would be by B-2, and F-22's followed by F-18'S, F-15's, ect.

 

[Thomas]

If you debunk it then tell me how if you can't then bye bye

better then that, how about you do a search before you post.

 

[zagahaga]

Sry b2 I said not b52 thoes have a RCS of ummmmmmmm 10000000000000000

 

[Jigs]

F117 was downed by low passive radars ? I think b52 are preety old now and most militaryies know how to counter them. But one thing can I ask of the miltary professionals how high do b52 would fly to hit SAM sites?

B-2s would be used. They would hit the airfields and nuclear sites which would be the end of Iran's program.

 

[Jigs]

Sry b2 I said not b52 thoes have a RCS of ummmmmmmm 10000000000000000

Of a small bird.

 

[zagahaga]

better then that, how about you do a search before you post.

Oh ok but I don't think it's fun to go throught 100+ pages when I can find out in a matter of minutes sir

 

[zagahaga]

But how high would they be the B2 ?

 

[zagahaga]

Of a small bird.

Huh???????????

 

[gambit]

better then that, how about you do a search before you post.

Just ignore the kid.

 

[zagahaga]

Just ignore the kid.

The kid is you who always makes stupied remarks if you don't like what you see or hear or read sir

 

[Jigs]

Huh???????????

Just watch this....

 

[gambit]

B-2s would be used. They would hit the airfields and nuclear sites which would be the end of Iran's program.

The geographically diverse Iranian nuclear weapons program gave it resiliency but also a weakness in that any serious damages to any component will take the program longer to recover. Resiliency should not be mistaken for speed. So regardless of any method used, we are not so optimistic that we can 'destroy' said weapons program, only that we can retard its progress and can make it financially difficult to continue. That difficulty can be extended through military and/or economic measures to make it financially prohibitive to recover, let alone make progress from when it was damaged.

 

[Jigs]

The geographically diverse Iranian nuclear weapons program gave it resiliency but also a weakness in that any serious damages to any component will take the program longer to recover. Resiliency should not be mistaken for speed. So regardless of any method used, we are not so optimistic that we can 'destroy' said weapons program, only that we can retard its progress and can make it financially difficult to continue. That difficulty can be extended through military and/or economic measures to make it financially prohibitive to recover, let alone make progress from when it was damaged.

I am saying if the U.S. hit every nuclear site they currently have information/location on i don't see Iran financially restarting their program for a long long time.