SOHEIL
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2011
- Messages
- 15,796
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
That is pretty good hit score. Far better than US Tomahawk attach on Syria. Does Iran have such UAV?
LOL
.
.
.
WTF is this !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is pretty good hit score. Far better than US Tomahawk attach on Syria. Does Iran have such UAV?
The picture tell it clearly
The missiles and drones hit all target from north west / west .
And that is not iran direction that is were attack from the usual trouble makers in the region will come.
That is pretty good hit score. Far better than US Tomahawk attach on Syria. Does Iran have such UAV?
I was thinking about the same thing. Seems like an air duct of some sort. The drone doesn't seem to be jet powered though.
I'm talking about overall score. It seems like all the drones did what they were supposed to do. I'm still failing to see what kind of damage those claimed 4 CMs caused? None of the damages shows could have been done by CMs. They usually carry large warheads.Seriously are you that dumb?
Of course the CM is not going to take a direct route from Iran to the target. The CM is going to mask its firing location by flying a different path along with the least detection capability.
And the CMs didn’t go to abqaiq
How is 4 out of 7 reaching it’s target a good hit score? That’s only 57% of reaching the target. None of the CMs were actually engaged by Air defense.
So in reality that is a terrible score. Because hit score could have been zero If detected
Looking at the angel of the wing it looks more like this: (top right corner)yes we have it
Not being detected and avoiding physical close to the ground hinders has probably put a lot of requirement on the chosen path. Probably on the limit if the said CMs capabilities. Trade off between crash or detection basically. Crash is better in order not to alarm the enemy and jeopardizing the entire mission.How is 4 out of 7 reaching it’s target a good hit score? That’s only 57% of reaching the target. None of the CMs were actually engaged by Air defense.
So in reality that is a terrible score. Because hit score could have been zero If detected
According to some USA official the angle of the attack suggest it was Iranian.well that's not the case, CMs could hit targets from any direction depending on preprogrammed route. the same for drones.
Then how USA official determined it come from iran according to its angle of hitting the targets ?Seriously are you that dumb?
Of course the CM is not going to take a direct route from Iran to the target. The CM is going to mask its firing location by flying a different path along with the least detection capability.
And the CMs didn’t go to abqaiq
this is too small to be thatI was thinking about the same thing. Seems like an air duct of some sort. The drone doesn't seem to be jet powered though.
I'm talking about overall score. It seems like all the drones did what they were supposed to do. I'm still failing to see what kind of damage those claimed 4 CMs caused? None of the damages shows could have been done by CMs. They usually carry large warheads.
Looking at the angel of the wing it looks more like this: (top right corner)
According to some USA official the angle of the attack suggest it was Iranian.
By the way why to do that . why make such maneuver when there is no obstacle for direct route.
Then how USA official determined it come from iran according to its angle of hitting the targets ?
I was thinking about the same thing. Seems like an air duct of some sort. The drone doesn't seem to be jet powered though.
I'm talking about overall score. It seems like all the drones did what they were supposed to do. I'm still failing to see what kind of damage those claimed 4 CMs caused? None of the damages shows could have been done by CMs. They usually carry large warheads.
Looking at the angel of the wing it looks more like this: (top right corner)
Seriously are you that dumb?
Of course the CM is not going to take a direct route from Iran to the target. The CM is going to mask its firing location by flying a different path along with the least detection capability.
And the CMs didn’t go to abqaiq
How is 4 out of 7 reaching it’s target a good hit score? That’s only 57% of reaching the target. None of the CMs were actually engaged by Air defense.
So in reality that is a terrible score. Because hit score could have been zero If detected
From imaginary satellite imaging and signit .From satellite surveillance and SIGNIT.
If you read the news. When satellites fly over they are constantly taking pictures and saving them. So then a team goes in a reviews when something happens.
If we are to believe to the US then the detection occurred BEFORE launch. But if they are lieing then it occurred after launch they found out when going back to review.
Iran has similar capabilities albeit not as advanced. When a terrorist attack happens and all the terrorists die, how does Iran know
To avoid AD sites ...According to some USA official the angle of the attack suggest it was Iranian.
By the way why to do that . why make such maneuver when there is no obstacle for direct route.
Then how USA official determined it come from iran according to its angle of hitting the targets ?
The type of drone they talk is toofan and it has only a range of 100km.
Well I am not an expert on this issue but as far as I know Patriot radars have azimuths of 120 and 180 degrees not 360 ... a new radar is under development to replace current one for 360 coverage by 2022...The type of drone they talk is toofan and it has only a range of 100km.
It even can't pass over Persian Gulf in direct route
And also those facilities are protected by patriot .