Messerschmitt
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2019
- Messages
- 2,662
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes,debka file is rather infamous for its near total lack of accuracy.Lots of false info in that article. Kaman-19 is a reconnaissance UAV.
well general nasirzadeh believe it can carry combat cargoLots of false info in that article. Kaman-19 is a reconnaissance UAV.
Where does Fotros stand compared to the new Shahed 149, Shahed 129, and the new IRIAF Kaman in terms of cost/performance and are they different enough from one another to justify the development of the Kamans?
Fotros is a pretty long endurance high altitude system, probably more comparable with S-149. Although S-129 is probably the most efficient system,Where does Fotros stand compared to the new Shahed 149, Shahed 129, and the new IRIAF Kaman in terms of cost/performance and are they different enough from one another to justify the development of the Kamans?
The question is what engine does it use?Where does Fotros stand compared to the new Shahed 149, Shahed 129, and the new IRIAF Kaman in terms of cost/performance and are they different enough from one another to justify the development of the Kamans?
I think the S149 does use a turbo prop, though not sure if domestic made.The question is what engine does it use?
It doesn’t use any turboprop, and many people say it uses rotax-914, so basically more platforms with no significant changes.
We can’t say it is a HALE drone if it uses a rotax-914 or a Turbodiesel one.
Shahed-129 is more than enough until iran mass produces a turboprop or mini turbofan/turbojet powered drone.
Yeah I know, it uses a variant of PT-6 turboprop. That’s why I said until iran “mass produces”.I think the S149 does use a turbo prop, though not sure if domestic made.
New Recruit
View attachment 774534
گونه رهگیر پهپاد جت ناصح،اجهز به چهار تیر موشک دوشپرتاب میثاق که در پدافند هوایی ارتش خدمت میکنه
پهپادهای رهگیر ایران یک گزینه کم خرج و کارامد جهت مقابله با پهپادهای متجاوزه و سرنگونی این دست هواگردها می باشد
MQM-107از نوادگان پهپاد
Seems like it might be more likely that TV-3's are used, whether reverse engineered or not.Yeah I know, it uses a variant of PT-6 turboprop. That’s why I said until iran “mass produces”.
Mystery Flying Wing Aircraft Photographed Over The Philippines (Updated)
The aircraft resembles the one seen in an image taken in California a year ago that is thought to be of the elusive RQ-180 stealth spy aircraft.www.thedrive.com
Mysterious drone in Philippine. To me looks like RQ180.
I disagree this is B21 as I expect B21 to have four F135 engines unlike this one. Specs are not officially released.
Provided they are the same type, the main difference between the sighting last year and the one of a few days ago is that the latter proves the mysterious (most probably unmanned) aircraft would be already conducting operational missions around the world. In fact, based on the location where the aircraft was spotted, it seems reasonable to believe it was returning from a mission in the South China Sea where there might have been interesting Chinese activity to surveil. Dispatching a HALE (High Altitude Long Endurance) low-observable drone from either the U.S. or a forward operating location (like Andersen Air Force Base, in Guam, that already hosts the RQ-4s) to cover some specific time-sensitive target, would totally make sense. These missions could require the aircraft to cross some unpopulated areas of the Philippines during daylight conditions (as happened on Sept. 2), when chances to be spotted from the ground are scarce.The photo, which was claimed to be taken, “…in California just north of Edwards [AFB]”, shows an aircraft trailing two prominent contrails, suggesting the altitude of the aircraft at the time the photo was taken was in excess of approximately 25,000 ft. Contrails require moist, cold air to freeze the water vapor expelled during normal jet engine combustion. Considering the altitude of the aircraft at the time the photo was taken, the size of the aircraft in the photo may be significant. Published estimates of the wingspan of the RQ-180 drone claim it may be as large as 130 ft. Estimates of the wingspan of the Polecat suggest it is about 90 ft.
The U.S. Air Force does not acknowledge the existence of the RQ-180 drone, but a number of factors seem to support theories of its existence and even operational deployment. One theory that supports the operational deployment of the RQ-180 is the reduction in the number of RQ-4 Global Hawk reconnaissance drones. It’s possible a newer, more capable RQ-180 may have taken over missions previously assigned to RQ-4s.
Forbes magazine reporter David Axe is another keen-eyed journalist who recognized the significance of the new Kolinsky photo. Late Sunday night Axe wrote, “The Air Force reportedly tested the roughly 170-feet-wingspan RQ-180 at Groom Lake, part of the Area 51 complex in Nevada. By early 2020 the RQ-180 apparently was so well-established in Air Force service that the flying branch was comfortable cutting its fleet of non-stealthy RQ-4 Global Hawk drones.”
[…]
Observers of the photo on internet forums have made some interesting insights about the Kolinsky photo. Some suggest the planform of the aircraft in Kolinsky’s image is nearly identical to the Polecat. A revived P-175 (the original one crashed in 2007) or a testbed based on it? Maybe.
Thats something new,in the vid at 1:51,you can see that the ground control station has 2 retractable antennas with covers,this would likely allow full time active control of 2 drones from one station.