Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where is the middle part?
Probably under repair or something. As a commander said already, sensitive parts of the corvette are under repair and separated from the main body.Where is the middle part?
Maybe the middle part is just submerged underwaterProbably under repair or something. As a commander said already, sensitive parts of the corvette are under repair and separated from the main body.
Yes, some civilian images from 12 days ago says the same:
They cut the ship and transfered to factory for repair.Maybe the middle part is just submerged underwater
Yes, some civilian images from 12 days ago says the same:
Iranian Navy vs a rocky coastline.....who will win?
Sheer and utter incompetence runs rampant in the kabob military akin to Saudi Arabian military.
If collisions means incompetency, then with no doubt, and based on evident facts, U.S has the most amateurish military in the world, to the extent you guys came up with cyber attack conspiracy theory! yes, even yourself can't believe your level of incompetency.Iranian Navy vs a rocky coastline.....who will win?
Sheer and utter incompetence runs rampant in the kabob military akin to Saudi Arabian military.
Iranian Navy vs a rocky coastline.....who will win?
Sheer and utter incompetence runs rampant in the kabob military akin to Saudi Arabian military.
The entire idea is unrealistic. Think about it.Although I agree that boarding is unrealistic, like we have said there will be barely any "outer" defence for the carrier if it is stationed in the Persian Gulf. It is simply too constricted in there.
Here is what you guys on this forum do not understand and it is because you guys are more interested in nationalistic cheering for the public instead of quietly do research and think about what you find, especially when the US military is a lot more open about our equipment and tactics than other countries are.Actually sinking ships was not the top priority. Knocking them out was the first step. The idea for Harpoon was to obtain a “mission kill” on a naval vessel. Once damaged, the ship was no longer as high a threat, and aircraft could return later with direct attack bombs to destroy it as needed. A Harpoon strike mission kill might disable the target ship’s defenses or eliminate its ability to see the battlespace.
In other words, the North Vietnamese MIGs did a 'mission kill' or 'soft kill' on the fighter-bombers. As soon as one fighter-bomber was hit, all jets jettisoned their bombs and maneuvered to survive. Without the bombs, the sortie was useless, therefore, whatever target planned survived another day.The MiG pilots' primary goal was to force strike aircrews to jettison their bombs early, thereby disrupting the bombing mission.
As soon as one boat is hit, the others will execute evasive maneuvers, using up critical mission items like fuel and time. Maybe a 'soft kill' on the entire fast boat flotilla where each boat ran to its 'bingo fuel' status and must return to port. Or the smoking ruins of the port....a live-fire demonstration of three Griffin B missiles against small, fast-moving boats in the first quarter of 2012. Each missile successfully engaged a speedboat located approximately 2km away from the launch location.
If you guys criticize the US Millennium Challenge 2002 as bad, scripted, unfair, and so on, then why do you guys continually touted it as evident that a fleet of small boats can take on a carrier group?
what make you think that we have not taken steps to correct the flaws the war game revealed,
The corollary is that the smaller the vessel, like a speedboat, the easier it is to produce a 'hard kill' with the same weapon.
You think we cannot hit a moving boat?
When you guys have not even considered something basic like sea state that WILL affect mission time, how can you expect learned people to take you seriously? If anything, I doubt that until now, you guys have ever heard of the Douglas Sea Scale.