SalarHaqq
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 4,569
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Maybe some of those weapons (Sadid or Almas) has been given to HZ. But all parts wants to keep their best cards for later. So if IDF wants (better said, are forced to enter) Lebanon, then HZ will activate more accurate and resolutive weapons (Sadid or Almas). I´am just speculating.
You aren't merely speculating but speaking elementary common sense here. Seems like an absolute no-brainer to me: systems like Almas or Sadid are evidently in shorter supply since more expensive to procure and more recent developments, so if HezbAllah is already equipped with these they'll be used in the event of higher intensity conflict e.g. zionists entering Lebanon or HezbAllah conducting incursions on occupied Palestinian soil, not in the framework of ongoing engagements. Giving away too much about the characteristics of a weapon still unknown to the enemy at this point wouldn't seem very wise either.
I'm at a loss as to why one would bring up and dwell on topics like these under current conditions, or why one would quote western regime mouthpieces when they take aim at Iranian officials, if not because of a possible desire to fulfill some daily nagging quota, which curiously seems to have doubled now that Iran is merely one step away from major armed conflict. Strange attitude to have. I for one was taught that a patriot, no matter their political persuasion, no matter their stance toward the government in charge, in case of war or potentially impending war will flawlessly side with their country and refrain from systematically trying to put down its achievements, split hair to find fault with everything let alone refer to the commander in chief of the armed forces as a "dog".
Evoking borderline MKO-type of misconduct, bitter memories starting to surface.
Last edited: