What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

ِDude, philosophy is like an endless ocean, you enter it you get fascinated and there is no way back. Once you see, years have passed and you have not managed a single firmed baseline for your own thoughts. You read X's beliefs and you have no choice but to accept it, and the next year you read Y's books, the absolute opposite of the X, and once again you have no way to reject it, and you have no other way to accept what he says cause you believe he is right either. Just like a small boat submitted to the waves of an ocean.
Not just me:lol:, but many believe that philosophy, should be considered an outdated science, it relies too much on spiritual aspects of human and masses behavior, hence I recommend you this one book you are currently reading be your last philosophical reading and rather you start reading psychology.
Psychology roots from both philosophy and physiology, where unlike philosophy it is not too reliant on spirituality and suprenality, and neither like physiology, it depends too much on physiological behavior of the mind.
Diversity of believes in Psychology, might be a little confusing like philosophy, but as it is a newborn science (around 100 years old) you can master the science very quickly.
As I consider myself a pro on the subject :lol:, you can ask for any books, dude.

Well, you remarked fascinating points, yet I am so so about your post.
For me, Philosophy is trying to find out the stuff that you have not find them out with experimental sciences.
In old times, philosophy was polluted with theology garbage, but now, it has reframed itself. Some like Stephen Hawking, think that philosophy will die as the physics expands. I believe they are wrong, since the philosophy includes broader perspective such as the philosophy of moralities, ...
About Psychology, it has always fascinated me. There has been many different theories about masses, and controlling them proposed by Edward Bernays, Anna Freud, George Gallop, ... yet, it does not replace philosophy, but is a more practical approach.
 
.
It's an animation involving a future battle between Iran and USA and there's an American aircraft carrier that hovers in the air, based in the South Pole. Iranian space ships discover it and go to destroy it. At that point I closed it so I don't know what happened.
Oh, I see, I have seen that bro, consider it an April's fool.
 
.
He's talking about that youtube clip you posted.

Thanks. Actually I am currently doing parallel stuff, making dinner, cleaning house, listening to a youtube video, writing another post, so have a lot of distraction. :lol:
 
. . .
Well, you remarked fascinating points, yet I am so so about your post.
For me, Philosophy is trying to find out the stuff that you have not find them out with experimental sciences.
In old times, philosophy was polluted with theology garbage, but now, it has reframed itself. Some like Stephen Hawking, think that philosophy will die as the physics expands. I believe they are wrong, since the philosophy includes broader perspective such as the philosophy of moralities, ...
About Psychology, it has always fascinated me. There has been many different theories about masses, and controlling them proposed by Edward Bernays, Anna Freud, George Gallop, ... yet, it does not replace philosophy, but is a more practical approach.
Hehe, I am so happy to see one buddy else being into those shits, like me.
But there is a question traditionally I'd like to ask, from those people interested in these fields, I mean the psychology, the philosophy, ...
Why?



About what you mentioned, ya that's totally true, these are all, Philosophy, Psychology, Supernaturalism, ... are all here to answer the questions, the unanswered questions, that we have no answer for, yet.
But the differences arise, when you are gonna choose the methodology, but the problem also starts here, I mean the methodology and the way to approach, is also considered a point of great and deep discussion and concern.
I don't think the philosophy will die, with the expansion of physicists, but like psychology aroused, you could see the glow of light would illuminate some doors of darkness but in the same time would illustrate ten's of folds of the unexperienced doors of ignorance, needed to be unlocked.
BTW, you also seem to be a pro on psychology, some the writers you mentioned I have read their books like the Freuds (father and daughter's garbages), Edward de bono, Karen Horney, Jean Piaget, Viktor Frankl, ....
I'd be happy to ask you some questions about the stuff, later, if you had the time and courage, bro.
 
.
Hehe, I am so happy to see one buddy else being into those shits, like me.
But there is a question traditionally I'd like to ask, from those people interested in these fields, I mean the psychology, the philosophy, ...
Why?



About what you mentioned, ya that's totally true, these are all, Philosophy, Psychology, Supernaturalism, ... are all here to answer the questions, the unanswered questions, that we have no answer for, yet.
But the differences arise, when you are gonna choose the methodology, but the problem also starts here, I mean the methodology and the way to approach, is also considered a point of great and deep discussion and concern.
I don't think the philosophy will die, with the expansion of physicists, but like psychology aroused, you could see the glow of light would illuminate some doors of darkness but in the same time would illustrate ten's of folds of the unexperienced doors of ignorance, needed to be unlocked.
BTW, you also seem to be a pro on psychology, some the writers you mentioned I have read their books like the Freuds (father and daughter's garbages), Edward de bono, Karen Horney, Jean Piaget, Viktor Frankl, ....
I'd be happy to ask you some questions about the stuff, later, if you had the time and courage, bro.

Well, to be honest, I am a reading addict. Being born in a house with hundreds of books, I got used to read many books about different stuff from Geneticts to logics, Physics to math, Philosophy to economics. This habit is also accompanying me to this age. :lol: Anyway, I am happy that I have not wasted my life on playing garbage games or such stuff. This forum has been my only and most time consuming(wasting) games :lol:
My fascination for Psychology comes from two sources, first from my interest in knowing the behavior of individuals, and second from my interest in political science, in which mind control of masses is an essential part of it ;)
Anyway, About Freud and Anna Freud's theories, I am not much against them as you seem to be so.
BTW, you are very welcome to ask any questions, but, I don't guarantee to answer them all in this week, since I am super busy in this week.
 
.
Algae is a living organism dude, it's smarter than these retards. They're closer to the IQ of a door handle or a toilet flush! That was like reverse propaganda. You do more damage to yourself with that retardation than good. I swear some hezbollahis will even face palm their faces after watching that.
so let me get this straight :

U are an MKO DB , i am a hezbollahi . alright ?

and u think u r smarter than me in any sort ? since i am superior to u in every field from IQ to success and ..... and also i am less than algae , what does that make u ? mineral water ?

Well, I have studied Hezbollahis as a new spicy and I can tell you that based on what they are supporting, they need to be dumber than some limits. My golden rule says that this limit is close to the IQ of an algae.
what they say in these situations ? ahah :lol:

B^%^& please !!

@WebMaster , how about banning for insult ?

@Abii might have been deserved to be banned , but not for posting a "torrent site" which no one knew about .

but for his continues cussing and cursing
 
.
Anyway, About Freud and Anna Freud's theories, I am not much against them as you seem to be so.
Indeed, I am not against, but I do consider their's baseless claims with no proofs.

BTW, you are very welcome to ask any questions, but, I don't guarantee to answer them all in this week, since I am super busy in this week.
Ok, thanks, maybe later.



P.S: BTW Poor dear @Abii, "So I will wait for you, just as long as you want me to, Yes I'll wait for you , I know you'll come through." :lol:
 
Last edited:
. . .
Could you please introduce some books about pshyology and philosophy? I'm interested in both of them ...
Dude, I was kinda joking about being pro, however about the books here you go;
تعبیر خواب - زیگموند فروید - توش ادعاهای بی پایه زیاده ولی می شه گفت جزو معروفترین و اولین کتابها بود
شناخت ماهیت انسان- آلفرد آدلر- اوایل دوست فروید بود اما بعد ها سر نظریه اساسی با فروید مشکل پیدا کرد و راه خودشو رفت اینم جزو پایه هاست
تضاد های درونی ما -کارن هورنای
انسان در جستجوی معنا - ویکتور فرانکل
کتاب های پیاژه هم خوبه اما اصلا جذاب نیستن
اگه کتابهای خیلی جذاب هم خواستی می تونی نوشته های سالهای 1947 و 1953 آلفرد کینزی رو بخونی :lol:


کتاب زیاده اما فکر کنم برای شروع همینا کافی باشه بعدش دیگه خودت استاد می شی

PS: Those are all about Psychology, I don't recommend any Philosophical book, as they might be dangerous to unarmed minds.
 
Last edited:
.

Thanks a million ... It gotta be hard to find the title but I'll give it a shot.
Dude, I was kinda joking about being pro, however about the books here you go;
تعبیر خواب - زیگموند فروید - توش ادعاهای بی پایه زیاده ولی می شه گفت جزو معروفترین و اولین کتابها بود
شناخت ماهیت انسان- آلفرد آدلر- اوایل دوست فروید بود اما بعد ها سر نظریه اساسی با فروید مشکل پیدا کرد و راه خودشو رفت اینم جزو پایه هاست
تضاد های درونی ما -کارن هورنای
انسان در جستجوی معنا - ویکتور فرانکل
کتاب های پیاژه هم خوبه اما اصلا جذاب نیستن
اگه کتابهای خیلی جذاب هم خواستی می تونی نوشته های سالهای 1947 و 1953 آلفرد کینزی رو بخونی :lol:


کتاب زیاده اما فکر کنم برای شروع همینا کافی باشه بعدش دیگه خودت استاد می شی

PS: Those are all about Psychology, I don't recommend any Philosophical book, as they might be dangerous to unarmed minds.

Thank you I can not appreciate your benevolent favor , I'll try to read all of them one by one.
Admittedly I have no knowledge on psychology but I have found Gustav Jung and Glasser and his choice theory interesting ... regarding philosophy you are right it's really dangerous but it's too late, I've already got trapped into it actually I can not prevent myself from reading it like moth to flame therefore you can do me a favor and introduce books on this field too.
 
. .
@haman10 enghadr be khodet feshaar nayaar, tokhmaat baad mikoneh :rofl: kollan ham kasi aadam hesaabet nemikone ;)
haalaa boro dobaare shorou' kon be geryeh zaari baraaye mod ha va admin ha ...
kaarish nemisheh kard, shaasgouli digeh.
You said you've read plenty of books throughout formative years of your life whilst it seems to me the absence of book on ethical codes and morality standards judged on your previous posts and discussion by Abii.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom