Iranian backed terrorists linked to Hezbollah caught in Kuwait

[babur_khan_is_sunni_turk]

... Islam originates from Hijaz (as does Sunni Islam, Sufism etc. and Islam as a whole obviously)

sufi is sunni. so no such thing as a non-sunni sufi.

the famous jibril alayhissalam hadith:
iman: maturidi or ashari
islm: hanafi, maliki, shafii or hanbali
ihsn: nakshibandi or other sunni tarikats

the othmani population from the sultan to the citizen all were members of sunni tarikats. the same for other turk states in india, persia, egypt, russia, china.

Shia ... originates from Hijaz ...

to elaborate, shiiteism originates from ibn saba. an ethnic jew from yemen.

Ironically the Safavids imported/attracted a lot of Shia Arab clerics and Mullah families from modern-day Eastern Arabia when they forcefully converted the Iranian population from Sunni Islam (mainly Shafi'i) to Shia Twelver Islam.

it is half sunni hanafi turks and half sunni shafii pars, arabs, kurds,... today there are 40 million ethnic turks in iran. sunni hanafi maturidi nakshibandi turks ruled persia from the abbasids until the safavids.

... Ismail’s capital Tabriz.

tabriz is a sunni turk city. shah ismail killed and terrorised the sunni turk population in tabriz. shah ismail killed and terrorised sunnis in persia and then other sunnis in neighbouring three sunni turk empires. so irans killing and terrorising of sunnis goes back 500+ years to safavids; and back to fatimids who cooperated with christian crusaders against sunnis. compare iran - christian american/russian cooperation in syria and iraq to fatimid - christian crusader cooperation.

 

[Tomyris]

Je suis d'accord avec votre point de vue , mais le parrainage militants semble toujours se retourner. Le Pakistan a appris de cette erreur grandement . Voilà pourquoi je crois que le monde arabe et les Iraniens doivent cesser de parrainer les groupes qui causent des troubles au Moyen-Orient .

quelle groupe l’Iran a parrainer??? le hamas qui combat Israël....le hezbollah qui combat Israël...et les milice irakienne qui on combattue les américain....comme j'ai dit le but et de chasser les impérialiste (je rappelle encore que le hamas et sunnite) tandis que les arabe on crée des monstre comme daesh et al qaidda qui on commis des massacre par million dans les pays musulman et comme par hasar a des nation qui on refuser la soumission comme l’Algérie et la Syrie et sa continue partout dans le monde.....il ya aucune comparaison a faire l’Iran finance pas des groupe mais bien la résistance c'est juste que les arabe traitre pour conserver leur trône il obéissent au ordre de leur maitre américain et il s'oppose a l’Iran il use de la propagande de leur cheick en carton et il intervienne face au pays faible qui refuse également la soumission .les américain on besoin du golf d'aden voila pourquoi les yahoudien intervienne ce n'est pas pour les beau yeux des yemenite car ce pays et un des plus pauvre au monde et pourtant il et voisin avec le plus riche au monde et en tant que musulman il on même pas eux la bonté de les aider a ce développer.....et le jour ou se peuple se soulève on veux le replonger dans la misère pour faire plaisir au américain.... au final les impérialiste on toute a y gagné , les monarchie conserve leur trône..et les US conserve le contrôle de la région et des richesse toute en laissant les autre faible et sous contrôle..et en même moment sa contribue a proteger Israël et a la rendre surpuissante

qui est le traitre et le terroriste dans cette histoire?

le Pakistan a fait cette erreur comme tu dit oui mais pour faire plaisir a qui?? qui a manipuler ces groupe?? ce sont bien sur les américain tandis que la résistance que l’Iran soutiens et contre les US
.

a médité mon frère

 

[OTTOMAN]

^^ What's going on up-there?
Monsieur, do not detract...... this thread is opened for the grand condemnation of Iranian mullas and their blind followers... if you have some bad words for them state in English... we are not going to learn French for that matter of fact.

 

[Hussein]

^^ What's going on up-there?
Monsieur, do not detract...... this thread is opened for the grand condemnation of Iranian mullas and their blind followers... if you have some bad words for them state in English... we are not going to learn French for that matter of fact.

this is showing how much Erdogan fanboys and KSA followers are
you insult a total religion in Iran . you don't insult the regime , the power , the bad policy, NO you insult the shias .
it shows so much how dirty mind you have

There are hardly any Farsis in Bahrain. Bahrainis are Arabians.

Arabian doesn't mean anything
they are Arabs in Iran and they dont share the culture of KSA , at all
we cannot compare an Iraqi (for most of them) with a saudi
Bahrainis are much more near the Iranians than the saudis . just a little bit culture would have teached you.

stop read your propaganda book once.

 

[Saif al-Arab]

Arabian doesn't mean anything
they are Arabs in Iran and they dont share the culture of KSA , at all
we cannot compare an Iraqi (for most of them) with a saudi
Bahrainis are much more near the Iranians than the saudis . just a little bit culture would have teached you.

stop read your propaganda book once.

You are dumber than I first thought.

Arabians are the inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula and this includes Bahrain genius. Using your logic there is nothing called Iranian.

Bahraini people and Saudi Arabians are almost identical people and fellow Semites, Arabians and Arabs, neighbors etc. with millennium old ties on all fronts. In fact people of the Eastern Province in KSA and Bahrain are identical and even speak the same Arabic dialect.

Bahrainis have nothing to do with Mullahstan. Keep having daydreams. Shia Islam originates from Hijaz and has nothing to do with Mullahstan either. Nor their culture, ethnic origins, traditions or language.

You cannot fool anyone here. I have been to Bahrain several times (it's a few minutes drive from KSA across the King Fahd causeway) while I am absolutely certain that you have never stepped foot in Bahrain let alone KSA that you are obsessing about 24/7.

How about you don't stick your dirty nose in the affairs of Arabs and worry about your beloved Iran that you escaped from?

For your information then most Arabs in Iran are either originally from Southern Iraq or KSA (Eastern Arabia) whether you like it or not. Nor are the 2 million Arabs in Iran out of 450 million Arabs relevant in any way. There are almost twice as many Arabs in the US alone.

Now stop quoting my posts. I prefer not to waste my time with 45 year old trolls. Somehow I have a very strong conviction of you not even being able to understand 10% of my post.

 

[LfcRed]

Bahrainis have nothing to do with Iran. Even most of the shias dont look up to them for help or any support. They regard the differences as an Arab most of all a Bahraini issue. They have nothing to do with Iran except some of the political rats trying to create havoc and chaos by smuggling weapons and explosives from Iran.

Both bahrain and kuwait need to understand that until they hand out tough punishments to these traitors who are causing trouble in the country and killing innocents, the problem will remain the same and even intensify. No mercy f they are to remove this menace.

 

[Hussein]

Bahrainis have nothing to do with Iran. Even most of the shias dont look up to them for help or any support. They regard the differences as an Arab most of all a Bahraini issue. They have nothing to do with Iran except some of the political rats trying to create havoc and chaos by smuggling weapons and explosives from Iran.

Both bahrain and kuwait need to understand that until they hand out tough punishments to these traitors who are causing trouble in the country and killing innocents, the problem will remain the same and even intensify. No mercy f they are to remove this menace.

let the people decide for their future instead of supporting the dictator

 

[LfcRed]

let the people decide for their future instead of supporting the dictator

I dont believe in democracy anyway whether it be Bahrain or Pakistan. You can visit Bahrain and experience it is nothing to do with dictatorship. And the people have all the democratic rights one needs in a democratic setup. Contrary to the situation now, in a typical dictatorship the opposition would have been nonexistent by now.

 

[Icewolf]

I dont believe in democracy anyway whether it be Bahrain or Pakistan. You can visit Bahrain and experience it is nothing to do with dictatorship. And the people have all the democratic rights one needs in a democratic setup.

Keep your dictator thoughts out of the Middle East please. Middle East needs democracy for atleast 20 years to stabilize.

Dictators = short term gain for countries

Democracy = long term gain

 

[LfcRed]

Keep your dictator thoughts out of the Middle East please. Middle East needs democracy for atleast 20 years to stabilize.

Dictators = short term gain for countries

Democracy = long term gain

Like the democracy stabilized Pakistan since the last 68 years. And we are yet to see the short term gains let alone the long term gains since a long time. I apologise but democracy is a wet dream for our countries and mindsets. However I support the many democratic rights introduced by Islam now instilled in the so called democracy of our time.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Like the democracy stabilized Pakistan since the last 68 years. And we are yet to see the short term gains let alone the long term gains since a long time. I apologise but democracy is a wet dream for our countries and mindsets. However I support the many democratic rights introduced by Islam now instilled in the so called democracy of our time.

Pakistan hasn't had democracy for the last 68 years, it has only had it in spurts, and you are welcome to total them.

Now, what alternative to democracy can you point to that is guaranteed to do a better job?

Dictators = short term gain for countries

Even short term gains are not guaranteed in a dictatorship - you could end up like North Korea under the Kim's, or Zimbabwe under Mugabe and autocratic leaders can be far more brutal and resistant to demands for change that dilutes their authority.

While flawed and corrupt democratic systems can also be resistant to change, Pakistan is a good example of a system that is currently ripe for reform and change in the next election cycle, provided the constitutional democratic process is allowed to continue and the Pakistani electorate educate themselves about their candidates and exercise their,right and responsibility to vote.

 

[Icewolf]

Like the democracy stabilized Pakistan since the last 68 years. And we are yet to see the short term gains let alone the long term gains since a long time. I apologise but democracy is a wet dream for our countries and mindsets. However I support the many democratic rights introduced by Islam now instilled in the so called democracy of our time.

What democracy? Every 2 years another general came and become maa baap of country. Then they left and destabilized it.
You need to have a strong system of democracy, and only then can the nation prosper. Remember dictators are only short term. Democracy wipes out the inefficient politicians, by way of the people

 

[Tomyris]

l'arabie yahoudite et les traitre turque , vous avez ne grande gueule ,continuer a servir vous maitre on va biento vous calmer bande de malade mentaux -_-

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

guys - English only s'il vous plaît

 

[Tomyris]

guys - English only s'il vous plaît

sorry i us google translation, the quality is poor