What's new

Iran warns the US over " the Red Line "

Status
Not open for further replies.
A non-Arab country is defending the dignity of an Arab country... while other "Arabs" are begging the west to invade another Arab country... I wonder why would the west need to intervene? of because their puppets F$A are losing badly....

let them intervene... and the whole M.E will burn
 
A non-Arab country is defending the dignity of an Arab country... while other "Arabs" are begging the west to invade another Arab country... I wonder why would the west need to intervene? of because their puppets F$A are losing badly....

let them intervene... and the whole M.E will burn

We heard something similar many times, but when the Zionist bombs are dropped, the only thing we hear is big talk, and big talk only.
 
We heard something similar many times, but when the Zionist bombs are dropped, the only thing we hear is big talk, and big talk only.

oh don't worry... the Zionists attacks have already been retaliated... their F$A terrorist army are losing badly, thus they want to intervene themselves, since their rats are losing badly..
 
oh don't worry... the Zionists attacks have already been retaliated... their F$A terrorist army are losing badly, thus they want to intervene themselves, since their rats are losing badly..

:lol: You don't have the courage to strike back directly. And if you think that the Israelis are supporting any group in this mess, then I guess you should talk to someone :lol:
 
:lol: You don't have the courage to strike back directly. And if you think that the Israelis are supporting any group in this mess, then I guess you should talk to someone :lol:

Israel have many times treated wounded terrorists, and allowed them to pass the restricted areas, but you are naive and don't know that Israel is benefiting from all the mess in the M.E. while Israel is doing nothing, because Israel has its puppets in the M.E such as GCC... that doing the dirty work for the Israel...

and again about striking Israel, we already had that conversation... and Alasad is wise enough to not make the west intervene.. Israel attempt to drag the west and nato by bombing Syria to help F$A... failed... and Syria retaliated against Israel in our special way. we know how to play our cards...
 
This is what is exactly said. US is not interested to do a military intervention in Iran, because it is not Iraq and Afghanistan. They will have to multiply supply of body bags be X number. Historically, Iranians have been known for not running away in Wars. They keep fighting.
8 years of sending little boys for no gain shows how tough! Wow! Iran is no Iraq? Neither are we.....genius.
 
and Syria retaliated against Israel in our special way. we know how to play our cards...

By inviting the West for using chemical weapons...



Assad didn't even said a word after 4 Israeli strikes, the coward.
 
By inviting the West for using chemical weapons...



Assad didn't even said a word after 4 Israeli strikes, the coward.

you must be really stupid, you know that if Syrian government used chemical weapons the west will intervene, and yet you believe that the Syrian government used chemical weapons so the west can intervene?

and what did Alqaeda ever do to Israel for killing Palestinians?

again I can't blame you... you are a supporter of Alqaeda thus you're ignorant and naive...

again Syria knows how to play it's card... we retaliated and Syria caused a lot of damage to the Israeli's and western puppet army...
 
8 years of sending little boys for no gain shows how tough! Wow! Iran is no Iraq? Neither are we.....genius.

Iran won't stand a chance against the US, no doubt about that. The reason why Sadam was backed unconditionally by the US was in response to holding the US diplomats as hostages, simply, Iran had to pay the price, which was heavy, so to speak. ;)
 
again Syria knows how to play it's card... we retaliated and Syria caused a lot of damage


To your brain maybe. And you allready are a dumb and naïve Assadist...


Not even a word, but lots of damage... :omghaha:
 
This is what is exactly said. US is not interested to do a military intervention in Iran, because it is not Iraq and Afghanistan. They will have to multiply supply of body bags be X number. Historically, Iranians have been known for not running away in Wars. They keep fighting.
The only user of body bags will be the Iranian military -- on its own soldiers.

We will have absolute control over Iranian airspace. Not 'can'. But WILL. The Iranian generals probably are done interviewing Iraqi Desert Storm survivors on how they made it through those days and nights of US carpet bombings and you can bet your next year's salary that they are scared. From the air, the US will send the Iranian military back to the 7th century, whether it like it or not.
 
The only user of body bags will be the Iranian military -- on its own soldiers.

We will have absolute control over Iranian airspace. Not 'can'. But WILL.

This only time will tell. However, history of Vietnam and Afghanistan does not support the claim. Even today ISAF is trapped in few bases of Afghanistan.
 
This only time will tell. However, history of Vietnam and Afghanistan does not support the claim. Even today ISAF is trapped in few bases of Afghanistan.
There were different political goals for Viet Nam and Afghanistan. This is where your amateurism in military history and political science is evident.

Political goals set the military objectives. The political goal says: Defeat country X. The generals then takes over and set the objectives such as take this and that hills, destroy this city, blockade this port, and so on.

If there is a commonality in military endeavors in different military campaigns, it is because the political goals are either identical or have high similarities. Why brought up Viet Nam and Afghanistan but not Iraq?

So if we want to militarily cripple Iran, we do not need to set boots in-country. We will have absolute control of Iranian airspace and from that, the Iranian Army will be demoralized and the Iranian Navy will be scattered.
 
Keep dreaming. May be Expandable 2 team can do the job no need to mobilise your whole army.
 
This only time will tell. However, history of Vietnam and Afghanistan does not support the claim. Even today ISAF is trapped in few bases of Afghanistan.

Yeah Afghanistan is tougher than all the opponents us and Russia have faced so far. Its a low scale conflict which revolves around acting as policemen.

Even Israel has not "defeated" insurgency yet it defeated all those arab armies..

Either the police role is being outsourced to drones things will change.

Any war with Iran will see its air sea land assets destroyed. Then they too might run around with like afghans. At that point the us would be wise to leave as its military is no longer a regional threat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom