gangsta_rap
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Messages
- 4,971
- Reaction score
- -38
- Country
- Location
"When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
strong or weak horse is always better than @ss hope u get it.,"When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse"
There are no foreign bases in Sri Lanka either so you can shove it yourself.Impossible ... we are friends but please don't compare Iran with sri lanka !!!
Hahahahaha ... Indianssss lol... They are asking 8,10 billions from you... If China come up with 20 billions ??? What will you do ?
I can't recall what the thread was, but I had this discussion with Indian and Pakistani posters a few months ago - I'm in favor of open trade with India provided some sort of caveat is built in that results in Indian businesses (specific sectors) setting up manufacturing facilities in Pakistan to supply a certain percentage of their overall product sales in Pakistan out of those units. Such an agreement would alleviate the concerns of some Pakistanis about local industry being damaged.. In addition having India invested in Pakistan has other benefits too for Pakistan as man of your intelligence can well extrapolate.
You didn't get the context of the comment did you?
Can anybody explain me why pakistan is reluctant to pass iran or tazak petroleum pipelines to india. Any trade would immensly benefit pak as well.
It isn't Pakistan that is an obstacle to the Tajik or Iranian pipelines going to India, it is the Indian government that is reluctant about the projects given their route through Pakistan.simple, they don't understand Trade.
I can straight away think of three sectors, Food processing, Textile and Cement where policy and business environment permitting Indian companies can invest.I'm in favor of open trade with India provided some sort of caveat is built in that results in Indian businesses (specific sectors) setting up manufacturing facilities in Pakistan to supply a certain percentage of their overall product sales in Pakistan out of those units. Such an agreement would alleviate the concerns of some Pakistanis about local industry being damaged.
You think Indian businessmen in right mind invest in Pakistan?I can't recall what the thread was, but I had this discussion with Indian and Pakistani posters a few months ago - I'm in favor of open trade with India provided some sort of caveat is built in that results in Indian businesses (specific sectors) setting up manufacturing facilities in Pakistan to supply a certain percentage of their overall product sales in Pakistan out of those units. Such an agreement would alleviate the concerns of some Pakistanis about local industry being damaged.
Pakistan and India have managed to make the IWT work, and abide by the dispute resolution mechanisms outlined within the treaty, so there is no reason investment in one country by the other cannot be similarly protected via an internationally backed treaty, so businesses can minimize concerns about loss of investment in case of political hostilities and have recourse to compensation.
Some Indian posters appeared quite 'ecstatic' about the possibility of Iran allowing Indian military bases in Iran - my question was posed to understand what specifically their rationale behind such claims was.I got that .
But that question is stupid .
Iran wont allow anyne no matter what.
I'm in favor of open trade with India provided some sort of caveat is built in that results in Indian businesses (specific sectors) setting up manufacturing facilities in Pakistan to supply a certain percentage of their overall product sales in Pakistan out of those units. Such an agreement would alleviate the concerns of some Pakistanis about local industry being damaged.
I'm just making an argument about the conditions under which I would support India-Pakistan trade normalization - from my end, without those conditions being met, India-Pakistan trade shouldn't be normalized.You think Indian businessmen in right mind invest in Pakistan?
I'm just making an argument about the conditions under which I would support India-Pakistan trade normalization - from my end, without those conditions being met, India-Pakistan trade shouldn't be normalized.
That is not how P2P or B2B trade works. Perhaps you are thinking in terms of FDI. Trade is simple exchange of goods and services and it will be determined by profitable demand and supply constraints.I can't recall what the thread was, but I had this discussion with Indian and Pakistani posters a few months ago - I'm in favor of open trade with India provided some sort of caveat is built in that results in Indian businesses (specific sectors) setting up manufacturing facilities in Pakistan to supply a certain percentage of their overall product sales in Pakistan out of those units. Such an agreement would alleviate the concerns of some Pakistanis about local industry being damaged.