What's new

Iran’s Imprisoned Ayatollah Suffers Heart Attack

Solomon2

BANNED
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
19,475
Reaction score
-37
Country
United States
Location
United States
commentary.png


Iran’s Imprisoned Ayatollah Suffers Heart Attack

Ben Cohen | @BenCohenOpinion
10.03.2013 - 4:05 PM


In July, I reported on the grave situation of Hossein Bourojerdi, one of Iran’s most courageous dissidents. Bourojerdi, who carries the honorific Shia Muslim title of “ayatollah,” is a veteran opponent of Iran’s ruling system of velayat e faqih, whereby Islamic jurists exercise total control over society and its institutions.

Bourojerdi was first incarcerated in 2006. At the time, hundreds of the ayatollah’s supporters valiantly attemped to stop him from being dragged out of his south Tehran home by the police. Since then, reports of Bourojerdi’s failing health have regularly surfaced. Now, Iranian human-rights activists have passed on the news that Bourojerdi, who is languishing in Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison, began experiencing heart failure last Sunday.

Only after Bourojerdi coped with extreme pain and shortness of breath for a full day did the Evin guards finally escort him from his cell for what passes for medical attention, by which point the ayatollah had undergone a heart attack. “Not only was he not given any medication while at the infirmary,” noted the latest bulletin on Bourojerdi’s plight, “the prison authorities continued to refuse his family’s delivery of medication that he had been prescribed before.”

A few days before his heart attack, Bourojerdi sent a thunderous appeal to the United Nations General Assembly urging the international body to once and for all confront the issue of human-rights abuse by the Iranian regime:

I sit here, at the start of my eighth year of captivity; jailed by a religious dictatorship and charged with defending the freedom of thought, speech and expression and refusing to align with tyrants who forcibly lord over Iran… Has the time not come for your assembly to demand that these brutal totalitarians respond to how they dare to speak of Bahrain, Syria and Palestine, under the guise of sympathy, when they have plundered and stolen the wealth and national income of every Iranian, rendering them impoverished and putting them in the ultimate financial and economic crisis?​

That time, of course, has not come. Bourojerdi’s missive passed unnoticed amidst all the cooing over the charm offensive launched by Hassan Rouhani, Iran’s new and–as we are endlessly informed–”moderate” president. While President Obama did, in his phone call with Rouhani, raise the continuing imprisonment of Saeed Abedini, a Christian pastor with American citizenship who has also been detained in Evin for the last year, the suffering of a Muslim cleric who has tirelessly advocated for the separation of mosque and state was deemed unworthy of even a mention.

But Bourojerdi’s case may yet receive the attention it warrants from an unexpected source. Ahmad Shaheed, the former foreign minister of the Maldives who presently serves as the UN’s “Special Rapporteur on the situation of Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” has won plaudits from Iranian democracy activists for his forthright reports on the mullah’s human-rights abuses. Shaheed is certainly aware of Bourojerdi’s situation, having received a letter from supporters and family members of the ayatollah in 2011, in which they asserted that an “illegal ban” on prison visits was designed to compel Bourojerdi to confess to fabricated crimes.

In his most recent report, Shaheed carefully traced the regime’s repression of religious minorities, citing the predicament of Christians and Bahais who are especially vulnerable to legal charges of heresy and apostasy. Significantly, Shaheed concluded that:

There has been an apparent increase in the degree of seriousness of human rights violations in the Islamic Republic of Iran…alarming reports of retributive State action against individuals suspected of communicating with UN Special Procedures raises serious concern about the Government’s resolve to promote respect for human rights in the country (my emphasis.)​

In other words, as well as refusing cooperation with UN nuclear inspectors, the regime is also criminalizing those who talk to the international body’s human-rights investigators. So far, Rouhani has given no indication that he will curb this intimidation. Indeed, his appointment of a hardliner with strong ties to Iran’s security apparatus, Mostafa Pourmohammadi, as the country’s minister of justice, does not bode well for Ayatollah Boroujerdi or any of the other activists that have run afoul of the Tehran regime.
 
.
Bourojerdi is a hero, and by religious standards even higher in the Shia Islamic hierarchy than Khamenei, who was only a simple hojjatoleslam when he all of a sudden was promoted to ayatollah. Boroujerdi comes from a respected religious family too, but that wasn't enough for the Islamic dictators in Iran to treat him with respect and dignity.
 
.
I miss the good old days of Monarchy/power struggle where you would just slip some poison into wine or grape juice to some , and take control of power
 
. .
comparing in an article Bourojerdi and the evangelist fanatics, wow .. stupid
worst: comparing the bahai's suffering and stupid decision to make it forbidden in Iran , to this christian fanatic, wow.
ok free this evangelist guy. but understand Iran cannot tolerate people who want to make hell inside Iran about religion, insult other religions and want to insert inside Iran a fanatic version of christianism
we have much more older christians than in USA . and they have no problem
 
.
Ben Cohen :drag:

My american friend calls this animal a pregnant b!!!tch :coffee:
 
.
comparing in an article Bourojerdi and the evangelist fanatics, wow .. stupid
worst: comparing the bahai's suffering and stupid decision to make it forbidden in Iran , to this christian fanatic, wow.
ok free this evangelist guy. but understand Iran cannot tolerate people who want to make hell inside Iran about religion, insult other religions and want to insert inside Iran a fanatic version of christianism
we have much more older christians than in USA . and they have no problem

I am wondering to know how an Iranian can become an evangelist?:blink::what::no: Its stupid. for me it is "az chaaleh be dar aamadan va be chaah oftaadan".
Btw, I support banning of promoting of all religions specially more stupid and dangerous ones, I mean salafism and evangelism.
 
. .
I am wondering to know how an Iranian can become an evangelist?:blink::what::no: Its stupid. for me it is "az chaaleh be dar aamadan va be chaah oftaadan".

Evangelism is not comparable to salafism, and besides that, Christianity has a longer presence in Iran than Islam.
 
.
Evangelism is not comparable to salafism, and besides that, Christianity has a longer presence in Iran than Islam.

Evangelism = Salafists. The thing is evangelicals tend to be educated so they are not willing to off themselves to push their agenda whereas salafist converts are usually dumb as bricks. Evangelicals however have been known to threaten violence depending on the circumstance.

The similarities however are striking both use vast sums of wealth to spread literature, both use fear as a motivating factor, both are relatively new movements in old well established faiths, both try to bribe the poor to increase conversions (evangelicals do this much much more often), and both are a menace to humanity on a whole.
 
.
Evangelism is not comparable to salafism, and besides that, Christianity has a longer presence in Iran than Islam.

both of them make people brain dead. So actually there is not too much of difference between them. actually, most of evangelist are in US, and they cannot do brutal actions, but salafis are in ME, so ... . that's why evangelists seem to be more peaceful. evangelists still have done some violence. I remember @iranigirl2 has mentioned some of their violent actions before, in a thread in the Iran section of forum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
both of them make people brain dead. So actually there is not too much of difference between them. actually, most of evangelist are in US, and they cannot do brutal actions, but salafis are in ME, so ... . that's why evangelists seem to be more peaceful.

In the US they still threaten violence but the hammer that would fall on them deters them eventually. They pick and choose their battles.
 
.
Of course , Messieurs Ben Cohen and Solomon2 know everything by virtue of being part of the chosen people. But to this simple Iranian, the gentlman in question looks a little too young to be an Ayatollah.

Ayatollah_Borujerdi.jpg


But what do I know? I defer to their profound knowledge of everything about everything and leave it to them to tell us the truth.
 
.
Evangelism is not comparable to salafism, and besides that, Christianity has a longer presence in Iran than Islam.
the Iranians Christians are not evangelist.

I am not anti evangelists. Like if i see a salafist, i don't like his choice. What i don't lik in them is untolerance : there was a documentary about them in Algeria teaching Islam was bullshit. And there i know one advocating catholics are not real Christians. Some of them seem to be fanatics. that's the fanatic side i find dangerous ina society. In a society we should live with respect of other religions and not avoid a sect insulting the other religions . their policy says much: they want to convert people.
I prefer when nobody tries to convert anyone and that it is a free choice without guys in the streets or somewhere else saying "come to the real religion " and kind of stupid things.

Armenians or whoever Christians in Iran never advocate anything. They are peaceful people.
 
.
the Iranians Christians are not evangelist.

I am not anti evangelists. Like if i see a salafist, i don't like his choice. What i don't lik in them is untolerance : there was a documentary about them in Algeria teaching Islam was bullshit. And there i know one advocating catholics are not real Christians. Some of them seem to be fanatics. that's the fanatic side i find dangerous ina society. In a society we should live with respect of other religions and not avoid a sect insulting the other religions . their policy says much: they want to convert people.
I prefer when nobody tries to convert anyone and that it is a free choice without guys in the streets or somewhere else saying "come to the real religion " and kind of stupid things.

Armenians or whoever Christians in Iran never advocate anything. They are peaceful people.

Dear Hussein,
I guess Surenas is not refering to armenians, he refers to newly converted christians. btw, I agree with your opinion about promoting religions, what they do is usually disgusting. in my opinion, Religious extremism(like salafism, and evangelism) is a disease in a society and needs to be treated.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom