What's new

Iran has marked a 40-km red zone inside Iraqi border

So nobody even the Iraqis themselves can get near the border outside 40km of Iran. Interesting...

You got it all wrong. What you said is exactly what U.S does to countries it doesn't like, e.g no fly zones.

What the commander meant is that in case ISIS get within 40 km red zone, Iran reserves the right to attack them inside Iraqi soil. Nobody said Iraqis can't come to that area. It's a red zone specifically for IS terrorists.
 
. . .
OK

nothing that dangerous that America has to deal with Mexico side.

Nope, its mostly all Mexicans killing each other. Haven't seen any Mexicans launching terrorist attacks in the U.S.
 
. .
So nobody even the Iraqis themselves can get near the border outside 40km of Iran. Interesting...

It's a buffer zone. Ofcourse Iraqis van get near, because they are. But Iran's warning the group that Iran sees a close proximity of the group as an act of aggression It's right to do so because no country in it's right mind waits until the enemy is at it's door unless you're France then you just surrender ;).
 
.
what about a drug war spilling from mexico to US

Cartel members are killing each other for the control of the drug trade. They aren't going into the U.S. to commit acts of terror. You can look and see how many citizens of Mexico have been killed.
 
.
Cartel members are killing each other for the control of the drug trade. They aren't going into the U.S. to commit acts of terror. You can look and see how many citizens of Mexico have been killed.

apart from killing each other they also kill civilians
killing under a different purpose is equally as bad as committing an act of terror.
 
.
apart from killing each other they also kill civilians
killing under a different purpose is equally as bad as committing an act of terror.
What Cartells are doing is the exact definition of terror hence they are also terrorists, not to mention that the actions of those Cartells is not less cruel and sometimes even worse than isis, you dont need to be a religious nutjob to be a terrorist, something many people forget.

terror: definition of terror in Oxford dictionary (British & World English)
 
Last edited:
. .
apart from killing each other they also kill civilians
killing under a different purpose is equally as bad as committing an act of terror.

But the difference is that the U.S. has not imposed something that Iran has because we don't experience such situations, while Iran has correct? If Mexico has citizens committing acts of terror on U.S. soil, then we probably imposed such zone like Iran has.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom