What's new

Iran ‘harrassed’ US aircraft carrier in Strait of Hormuz

BHarwana

MODERATOR
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
24,827
Reaction score
20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
&NCS_modified=20170322191924&MaxW=640&imageVersion=default&AR-170329648.jpg

The USS George HW Bush aircraft carrier transits the Strait of Hormuz on March 21, 2017. Laura Mackenzie / The National

ABOARD THE USS GEORGE HW BUSH // A US aircraft carrier was "harassed" and "threatened" by armed Revolutionary Guard vessels while passing through the Strait of Hormuz this week, as the ship’s captain said the lack of stability and predictability from Iran was the main security threat facing the Arabian Gulf.

The US navy said up to 20 small Iranian vessels were involved in the incident which took place on Tuesday as the USS George HW Bush was sailing to the northern Gulf to take part in anti-ISIL operations.

It was not clear if all of the Iranian boats, known as Fast Inshore Attack Craft, were armed.

"The number one thing that bothers me is they [the Iranian vessels] had their weapons uncovered," said Rear Admiral Kenneth Whitesell, the commander of the Bush carrier strike group – an operational formation of the US navy that includes around 70 aircraft and seven smaller vessels.

"The second thing that bothers me is that they had their weapons manned. And the third thing ... is they were loading their weapons while they were rendezvousing us and they were coming right after us."

Admiral Whitesell described the incident – in which one of the carrier’s helicopters was threatened, according to the US navy – as "very aggressive". At one point, an Iranian boat was less than 900 metres from the carrier.

"It’s unprofessional behaviour, it’s harassment behaviour and it’s something you wouldn’t expect when you’ve got a hundred giant vessels per day going through the Strait of Hormuz, and – at least from the flow of oil – the most critical strait in the world," said Admiral Whitesell.

"This is their routine behaviour, which in any other area of the world, any other maritime environment, this would be seen as a violation of international law."

Last year, there were 527 interactions between US naval forces and Iranian naval forces, 35 of which the US deemed to be unsafe or unprofessional on Iran’s part. Before Tuesday, there had been six such interactions so far this year.

The main security threat in the Gulf is the "instability and a lack of predictability we currently see from Iran", the captain of the USS George HW Bush, Will Pennington, told The National following Tuesday’s encounter.

The lack of predictability from Iran "ebbs and flows, and certainly in recent times, if you would consider over the last three or four months, we have seen more".

Admiral Whitesell said the US viewed threats to maritime security in the Bab Al Mandeb from Houthi militants in Yemen as "Iranian-sponsored activity".

"So just a transference of capabilities to the Houthis in the Red Sea and Bab Al Mandeb. And that’s very disconcerting, very concerning to us."

The USS George HW Bush launched air strikes on ISIL from the eastern Mediterranean before travelling to the Gulf.

Admiral Whitesell said the carrier would resume strikes against the extremists in Mosul and then in Aleppo and Raqqa from the Gulf either on Thursday or Friday after a three-week hiatus.

http://www.thenational.ae/world/middle-east/iran-harrassed-us-aircraft-carrier-in-strait-of-hormuz
 
. . . .
Don't dont forget the motto, United States Navy A global force, For Good.

Lol... I guess so...
 
. .
while I have no doubt that they exaggerate on the boats distance to justify their fear, I have to say you're welcome!
 
. . . . .
Come and get it. Lay claim to the Persian Gulf.
I know its an unfamiliar concept for you, but we respect something known as International rules and regulations.

"come and get it" ? its already ours dear. it needs no getting back.

Just this sentence and its done: "Persian Gulf is now closed to all foreign ships".

there you go. now who has the balls to move a single feather?
 
.
I know its an unfamiliar concept for you, but we respect something known as International rules and regulations.

"come and get it" ? its already ours dear. it needs no getting back.

Just this sentence and its done: "Persian Gulf is now closed to all foreign ships".

there you go. now who has the balls to move a single feather?

You probably don't know the concept "its already ours dear" when you got a U.S. carrier coming in and you don't want it coming in and but don't do anything about it.

Reminds me of a few years ago...
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2012/0...craft-carrier-dont-come-back-to-persian-gulf/

(The Blaze/AP) — Iran’s army chief on Tuesday warned an American aircraft carrier not to return to the Persian Gulf in Tehran’s latest tough rhetoric over the strategic waterway, part of a feud with the United States over new sanctions that has sparked a jump in oil prices.

Gen. Ataollah Salehi spoke as a 10-day Iranian naval exercise ended near the Strait of Hormuz at the mouth of the Gulf. Iranian officials have said the drill aimed to show that Iran could close the vital oil passage, as it has threatened to do if the United States enacts strong new sanctions over Iran’s nuclear program.

Salehi’s warning for the U.S. aircraft carrier not to come back seemed aimed at further depicting the strait and the Gulf as under Iran’s domination, though there was little way to enforce his warning without military action. The strait is divided between Iran and Oman’s territorial waters, and international law requires them to allow free passage through it.

“We recommend to the American warship that passed through the Strait of Hormuz and went to Gulf of Oman not to return to the Persian Gulf,” Salehi was quoted as saying by the state news agency IRNA.
 
.
but don't do anything about it.
Its cause they don't pose any threat to us and they fall under the "safe passage" term.

as i said, if we want it closed, its closed. We know it, you know it, everyone else knows it. this is not a delusion of grandiosity. its just a capability we've reached over the past decade.
 
.
Its cause they don't pose any threat to us and they fall under the "safe passage" term.

as i said, if we want it closed, its closed. We know it, you know it, everyone else knows it. this is not a delusion of grandiosity. its just a capability we've reached over the past decade.

If you wanted to close it, you would have done so but realize what would happened. Threatening a carrier not to come back is not the same thing as closing it. Your general knows what would happen.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom