What's new

Iran Expresses Clear Reservations Over the Islamic Military Coalition

GlobalVillageSpace

Media Partner
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
993
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Iran Expresses Clear Reservations Over the Islamic Military Coalition
Global Village Space |


Iran has expressed clear reservations over the appointment of General Raheel Sharif as the head of the Islamic military alliance, known colloquially as the Muslim NATO, saying it is not ‘satisfied’ with the coalition.

“We are concerned about this issue… that it may impact the unity of Islamic countries.”
– Mehdi Honardoost

Last week when Khawaja Asif, the defense minister, revealed on TV that the government had given approval for Raheel Sharif to take the position, there was a furor in the country and dissension was expressed by political parties over the decision. The solace given to the media and country was that General Sharif had laid down conditions to accepting and that Iran had been taken into confidence on the matter.

Today, IRNA, Iran’s State-Run News Agency, has quoted Mehdi Honardoost, Iran’s Ambassador to Pakistan as saying, “We are concerned about this issue… that it may impact the unity of Islamic countries.” However, he confirmed that Islamabad had contacted Iranian officials to discuss the matter before giving permission to Raheel Sharif to lead the coalition.

Read more: Should General Raheel have regrets?

The Saudi Arabian government has sold the coalition as being against terrorism, however, unfortunately, the battle against terrorism and sectarianism are gray areas.

Tehran had at that time informed Islamabad that it would not become part of this military alliance and neither had Iran been extended an offer to join the coalition. Honardoost proposed that all important Islamic countries should come together to form a “coalition of peace” in order to resolve their issues “rather [than] forming a controversial military alliance”.

The appointment of General Sharif as head of this military coalition has been very controversial since the idea was first thrown out several months ago. All those against the idea are worried about the sectarian dimension of this decision and the effect it has on the country’s foreign policy.

Pakistan is one of the leading countries in the Muslim world with its largest army and nuclear weapons. It has generally avoided taking sides in conflicts involving intra-Middle-Eastern countries.

The Saudi Arabian government has sold the coalition as being against terrorism, however, unfortunately, the battle against terrorism and sectarianism are gray areas. While, the Saudi’s have stated that the coalition will involve operations against terrorism in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Egypt, and Afghanistan; it did not help its cause, that the coalition was announced when it was in the middle of a messy and intractable military situation with Yemen.

Read more: Nasser Janjua thinks Raheel Sharif will bring unity among ‘Muslim world’

Pakistan has been under pressure to join the coalition since it was formed in December 2015. Initially, the Saudi Arabian government named it as a member of the coalition, without even getting Pakistan’s acquiescence on the matter.

Given the resistance the coalition has faced from the opposition political parties and the media, the government – who is keen to join – has kept a deliberate policy of ambiguity in public over the objectives of this coalition and its ambit.

Read full article:
Iran Expresses Clear Reservations Over the Islamic Military Coalition
 
. .
Shouldn't it be called the Sunni Islamic Military Coalition? It specifically targets Iran.
 
.
Concerns are illogical as RS is retired and as per rules can take up any job in personal capacity after getting NOC from GoP. He will not be representing GoP or Pak Army.
 
.
No one cares. Its in Pakistan's national interest to be part of this alliance. We can't shut out 39 other countries just because Iran will be pissed off. We didn't go gaga over Iranian defense pact with India signed in 2003 when India was about to invade Pakistan.
 
. .
Then iran should stop destabilizing the ME. Their 2nd in command has been called an irani version of Bin Laden or Al Baghdadi.
 
. .
Iran Expresses Clear Reservations Over the Islamic Military Coalition
Global Village Space |


Iran has expressed clear reservations over the appointment of General Raheel Sharif as the head of the Islamic military alliance, known colloquially as the Muslim NATO, saying it is not ‘satisfied’ with the coalition.

“We are concerned about this issue… that it may impact the unity of Islamic countries.”
– Mehdi Honardoost

Last week when Khawaja Asif, the defense minister, revealed on TV that the government had given approval for Raheel Sharif to take the position, there was a furor in the country and dissension was expressed by political parties over the decision. The solace given to the media and country was that General Sharif had laid down conditions to accepting and that Iran had been taken into confidence on the matter.

Today, IRNA, Iran’s State-Run News Agency, has quoted Mehdi Honardoost, Iran’s Ambassador to Pakistan as saying, “We are concerned about this issue… that it may impact the unity of Islamic countries.” However, he confirmed that Islamabad had contacted Iranian officials to discuss the matter before giving permission to Raheel Sharif to lead the coalition.

Read more: Should General Raheel have regrets?

The Saudi Arabian government has sold the coalition as being against terrorism, however, unfortunately, the battle against terrorism and sectarianism are gray areas.

Tehran had at that time informed Islamabad that it would not become part of this military alliance and neither had Iran been extended an offer to join the coalition. Honardoost proposed that all important Islamic countries should come together to form a “coalition of peace” in order to resolve their issues “rather [than] forming a controversial military alliance”.

The appointment of General Sharif as head of this military coalition has been very controversial since the idea was first thrown out several months ago. All those against the idea are worried about the sectarian dimension of this decision and the effect it has on the country’s foreign policy.

Pakistan is one of the leading countries in the Muslim world with its largest army and nuclear weapons. It has generally avoided taking sides in conflicts involving intra-Middle-Eastern countries.

The Saudi Arabian government has sold the coalition as being against terrorism, however, unfortunately, the battle against terrorism and sectarianism are gray areas. While, the Saudi’s have stated that the coalition will involve operations against terrorism in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Egypt, and Afghanistan; it did not help its cause, that the coalition was announced when it was in the middle of a messy and intractable military situation with Yemen.

Read more: Nasser Janjua thinks Raheel Sharif will bring unity among ‘Muslim world’

Pakistan has been under pressure to join the coalition since it was formed in December 2015. Initially, the Saudi Arabian government named it as a member of the coalition, without even getting Pakistan’s acquiescence on the matter.

Given the resistance the coalition has faced from the opposition political parties and the media, the government – who is keen to join – has kept a deliberate policy of ambiguity in public over the objectives of this coalition and its ambit.

Read full article:
Iran Expresses Clear Reservations Over the Islamic Military Coalition

Iran should join them as well as it will neutralize anti Muslims elements. Forget past and try to make solid future
 
.
No one is protesting against Islamic Military Coalition. It is good
But the problem is : this coalition ,if even exists, will be used against Islamic countries LOL, Islamic military serving Israel's interest.
Better to call it monarchy military coalition.
No country ever called it sunni but iran has stupid fears of it being anti shia...how rude of iran.
An other assumer of things!!! Who said that we are against Sunni army?!
Sunni army plus our army can liberalize our holy land of Palestine within 24 hours.
 
.
Shouldn't it be called the Sunni Islamic Military Coalition? It specifically targets Iran.
Or may be we called it Islamic Military Coalition specifically targets Hindu's or Christians. Grown up and they need an alliance just like NATO or any other
 
.
Or may be we called it Islamic Military Coalition specifically targets Hindu's or Christians. Grown up and they need an alliance just like NATO or any other
If people consider NATO as Christian alliance then this can be termed as Islamic alliance.
But will it be as effective as NATO? That has to be seen.
 
.
If people consider NATO as Christian alliance then this can be termed as Islamic alliance.
But will it be as effective as NATO? That has to be seen.

It is in initial phase and need to to mature NATO is 50 year old setup and they are now fully mature. This alliance first need inclusion of few more countries and then a separate setup just like NATO
 
.
Lots of muslims unite to beat a smaller group of Muslims?
It can't be a Islam world leader's behavior.
 
.
Iran's suggestion for a Muslim coalition that promotes peace in the region could also be adopted under this coalition.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom