What's new

Iran Builds 3rd Underground Missile Factory

An underground storage facility. Not a defensive fortification. If you were right, no-one would build missile silos, bunkers etc.
They are not talking about, underground storage, nor silos, nor fortifications..it is about underground facilities/factories to manufacture missiles.. this is a measure taken against the possibility of air raids on missile factories or the use of some kind of Tomahawk cruise missiles, because war factories are the first to be hit..
 
.
When did a person from my country committed an act of terrorism in Europe?
You didn't properly read who I was quoting earlier then, so you completely misunderstood my point.

this is exactly difference between thinking of you and us
you have no pride and honor but persian people dose
so when someone slap in face for your better life like dog shake your tail for him
bic your better life depend on him
I don't even know what you are on about. I'm sorry. :undecided:
 
. . . .
of course you know only thing you have of man maybe ball but in reality i dont think so maybe gay
:cheesy:
LOL Guess you people have the biggest manhood amongst all. Care to share with me your secret. :undecided:

Though I always thought some of our African friends had the biggest of all,they don't even need a monument for that. :azn:
 
. .
good for you they can help you to get calm

:cheers::cheesy:

I won't say help me get calm, more like .......
13919689092567.jpg

OMG-Funny-Cat-Shocking-Face-Image.jpg
 
.
Fortication is a form of protection. It's like saying that tank armor is not neseccary since new generation atgms can penetrate the older generation tank armor. Obviously defensive and offensive technologies are getting evolved simultaneously and when a new generation of one comes out then the counter of the other is developed and the iterations continues.
Obviously the same thing goes with underground bunkers and bunker busters. Both of them have immense research behind them. Modern bunkers e.g. have various levels of different materials incorporated into them in order to defeat the bombs. Having no protection on the hand would make the counter strategies of your opponent much easier and cheaper since there is one less obstacle for them to defeat. Common sense really.
Seriously, you are comparing tank armor to

220px-Atlantikwall.gif

30a98460.gif

german-cannon-bunker-at-the-atlantic-wall-1943-CPM9FM.jpg


or
siegfried-map.jpg
330px-Maginot_Line_ln-en.PNG

Frances-Maginot-Line-1.jpg

2Gi0eLr.jpg

or
300px-Karte_westwall.png

siegfried-line-1938.jpg


I guess your Cheyenne Mountain Complex doesn't work either or is that rule only apply to Iran, Mr. Go F yourself?
Ultimately, yes, that too is obsolete. Notice the immense difficulty keeping it up to date. Moreover, consider:

The bunker itself is built to deflect a 30 megaton nuclear explosion as close as 2 kilometers (1.2 mi).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheyenne_Mountain_Complex

RS-28 Sarmat (NATO SS-30 "Satan 2") The RS-28 Sarmat was expected to become operational in 2016. In February 2014, a Russian military official announced the Sarmat was expected to be ready for deployment around 2020. It carries 10-24 MIRVs (various type and yield). At the maximum reported throw-weight of up 10,000kg, this missile could deliver a 50 Mt charge. Guidance system combines inertial guidance, GLONASS, and astrocelestial.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-28_Sarmat

No CEP is given for this missile but that of the preceeding R-36M (NATO SS-18 Satan) is 1000m, 920m for the R-36MUTTKh and 500m for the R-36M2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-36_(missile)

I do not expect the RS-28 to perform any less than the best R-36.

PC-24_%C2%AB%D0%AF%D1%80%D1%81%C2%BB-1024x684.jpg
 
. .
Are you Seriously comparing fortified missile storage to static defensive lines of ww2?
You failed to note missile silos and spots where TELs can launch from underground positions? Those make firing positions i.e. a fortress.
 
. .
Its the same thing with the missiles forming the hitting element of the 'defensive wall', rather than guns in bunkers.

"Military leader boasts on film of ‘new and advanced generation’ of missiles that can ‘erupt like a volcano from the depth of earth’ "
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...round-missile-base-with-broadcast-on-state-tv

And so on:
Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, commander of the Islamic Republic’s Revolutionary Guards’ aerospace division, said numerous such tunnels existed across the country at a depth of 500 metres.
“The Islamic republic’s long-range missile bases are stationed and ready under the high mountains in all the country’s provinces and cities,” he said, according to the division’s website.
The commander said the missiles were ready to be launched from all over Iran, on the order of “the supreme commander-in-chief”, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
“This is a sample of our massive missile bases,” he said, adding that “a new and advanced generation of long-range liquid- and solid-fuel missiles” would start to replace existing weapons next year.


Iran recently publicized a third underground missile silo while also showing the launch of a single ballistic missile through the top of a mountain
2016-03-10T060734Z_1_LYNXNPEC2908V_RTROPTP_4_IRAN-MISSILES.jpg

http://www.nationalsecurity.news/20...ssile-silo-as-icbm-development-continues.html

Iran unveils underground missile silos
image.

Iranian State television unveils the country's underground missile silos, Monday, June 27, 2011.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/iran-unveils-underground-missile-silos-1.662701

iran-and-the-bomb-strategic-considerations-in-the-middle-east-je-jennifer-dyer-15-638.jpg


32024A1800000578-3483465-image-a-72_1457521784357.jpg

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3483465/Iran-fires-2-missiles-marked-Israel-wiped-out.html

This must be the stupidest comment I've read in a while. My God.
Sure. :lazy2:
 
.
You failed to note missile silos and spots where TELs can launch from underground positions? Those make firing positions i.e. a fortress.
Assuming this logic is valid, it still does not remove the possibilities for the vehicles to leave the storages and fire under blue sky. It's still better to have them under protection for an eventual first strike of the opponent, don't you agree?
 
.
@Penguin the maginot line and Iran's "missile cities" play fundamentally different roles. They are incomparable.

Something like the maginot line is a barrier to invasion, it is meant to be the frontline of fighting.

Iran's missile cities and silos are hardened strike positions to attack strategic enemy targets. They are OFFENSIVE not DEFENSIVE in nature. The fortifications, like underground position and concrete reinforcement is meant to make an enemy attempt to destroy the missiles much harder, NOT to aid Iran in fighting off an invasion.

Saying Iran's underground missile complexes are obsolete is tantamount to saying all missile silos are obsolete.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom