What's new

Featured Iran Boots Out India From Huge Gas Field Development

.
Iran has decided to use local firms to develop a large offshore natural gas field, which was discovered by an Indian company and set to be developed by a group of Indian firms, Press Trust of India reported on Monday, citing sources with direct knowledge of the plans.

An Indian consortium led by ONGC Videsh discovered the huge Farzad-B gas field back in 2008. Iran and India have since negotiated the terms of the field’s development for years, in fits and starts.

Three years ago, the Indian consortium led by ONGC Videsh offered Iran US$11 billion in investments into the Farzad-B field on the condition that the Iranian authorities can guarantee it a reasonable level of returns. Reasonable, ONGC said in 2017, was 18 percent, according to the managing director of the company’s overseas investment arm.


Negotiations between Indian companies and Iran on the development dragged on for years, with pressure building between the parties in 2017 after Iran delayed its final decision about the field several times. India responded to the delays with threats of reduced Iranian oil imports.

Iran added fuel to the fire at the end of May 2017 when it signed an initial agreement for Farzad-B with Russia’s gas giant Gazprom. The news, announced by Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh, came on the back of earlier remarks that Russian energy companies may take the place of Indian sector players in Iran’s oil and gas fields.

After a few more years of stalled development talks, also because of the U.S. sanctions on Iran’s energy industry, it now looks like Iran has decided to forgo the use of foreign firms and replace the Indian consortium with domestic companies.

According to Press Trust of India’s sources, the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) told ONGC Videsh in February 2020 that it planned to sign a contract to develop the Farzad-B field with an Iranian company. ONGC Videsh, however, continues to seek contact with Iran about the field, but Iran hasn’t responded to the Indian firm yet, the sources said.

@Indus Pakistan Bro, I think this would be a perfect opportunity for Iran and Pakistan to work together on more gas deals. Due to current sanctions things will be difficult, but god willing Trump will go out of office and we'll be free to pursue such deals in the next few years.
 
Last edited:
.
The Iranians have finally accepted that alliance with India is not of much benefit on the ground. Indians talk big but offer little help in reality. Saddamists saw this a few decades ago. Kabul/USA saw this more recently. Armenia is seeing this today. In the future.....UAE and GCC will also see this. :pop:
 
.
so much for "Iran's master is India" and "Iran and India are good friends"...smh..
Iranians have been immature and politically naive. To even consider having geopolitical relations with India was grossly naive and stupid rolled into 1. India today is bowing and courting a relationship with the USA - naturally Iran will be black balled. Why did it take Iran so long to crawl out of its rock and realise it’s nativity?
 
. .
Iranians have been immature and politically naive. To even consider having geopolitical relations with India was grossly naive and stupid rolled into 1. India today is bowing and courting a relationship with the USA - naturally Iran will be black balled. Why did it take Iran so long to crawl out of its rock and realise it’s nativity?

It was expected, I was waiting for him to show up, while in another thread he supports Indians.

Actually this is CHinese influence and demands, has nothing to do with instrinsic iranian sentiment. Sulemani gained alot by supporting US, Iran, and NATO against neighboring countries.

--------

In the chaotic days after the attacks of September 11th, Ryan Crocker, then a senior State Department official, flew discreetly to Geneva to meet a group of Iranian diplomats. “I’d fly out on a Friday and then back on Sunday, so nobody in the office knew where I’d been,” Crocker told me. “We’d stay up all night in those meetings.” It seemed clear to Crocker that the Iranians were answering to Suleimani, whom they referred to as “Haji Qassem,” and that they were eager to help the United States destroy their mutual enemy, the Taliban. Although the United States and Iran broke off diplomatic relations in 1980, after American diplomats in Tehran were taken hostage, Crocker wasn’t surprised to find that Suleimani was flexible. “You don’t live through eight years of brutal war without being pretty pragmatic,” he said. Sometimes Suleimani passed messages to Crocker, but he avoided putting anything in writing. “Haji Qassem’s way too smart for that,” Crocker said. “He’s not going to leave paper trails for the Americans.”

Crocker described sharing information with the Iranians, including getting a map detailing the locations of the Taliban and giving Iran the location of an al-Qaeda facilitator, whom Iran soon detained. Crocker said the negotiator he was working with told him, “Haji Qassem is very pleased with our cooperation.”

 
Last edited:
.
The people in mid East region are waking up to new realities. Damned if you do make a deal damned if you don't. The whole middle Eastern have put themselves in this position on their Own doings.
 
.
The Iranians have finally accepted that alliance with India is not of much benefit on the ground. Indians talk big but offer little help in reality. Saddamists saw this a few decades ago. Kabul/USA saw this more recently. Armenia is seeing this today. In the future.....UAE and GCC will also see this. :pop:
UAE, Saudi, oman and/or Kuwait will not learn this lesson, not in the near future.. Indians there make up the highest no of non native residents, they literally feed them as majority of vegetables and pulses are from india., the drivers, wathhmen, caretakers and similar roles are mainly Indians. Long story short... Their sedentary and chill life style is supported by Indians..
So buddy... U r wrong here
 
.
Iran Boots Out India From Huge Gas Field Development
When did India even take part, it is another fake news like the one peddled of Iran throwing away India from Chabahar rail project which came to be false later.
 
.
Please don’t go off topic - this thread has nothing to do with Pakistan - so why bring it in?
Secondly your insinuation and boring trend mentioning “your friends” is another standard trait. You don’t know who my friends are and are not. Don’t naively assume because I feel iranians have been naive - that means instantly I’m in the Saudi camp - it’s very immature and childish and above all not true.
Now look at the topic and then look at your obsession by bringing China and Pakistan into this. Why do you keep doing this? Do you think deflection is the best form of defence?
Accept China has forced you to re think your alliance and pointed you in the right direction. India and Iran was never going to be a marriage made in heaven.
Apart from being the world biggest open sewer and most impoverished nation, what ascendency is india witnessing......... :azn: ?

PS Considering that you claimed that you were a Christian Nigerian, shouldn't you be praising Nigeria?

We are still waiting for this Islamophobic member to come visit the thread I specifically created to debunk his lies against Pakistan.


Yet he will not come to defend his claims. He is a coward.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
We are still waiting for this Islamophobic member to come visit the thread I specifically created to debunk his lies against Pakistan.


Yet he will not come to defend his claims. He is a coward.




If he's indian then everything he says is a lie.

india = lies, lies and more lies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
Good riddance.

India has proven to be an extremely unreliable partner that is unwilling or unable to exercise strategic autonomy in the face of American maximum pressure. Indian foreign policy incompetence is just staggering.

Today many actors in Iran today can deliver on these projects themselves, for example Khatam Anbinya. Therefore foreigners need to be on their A game otherwise they will be replaced. Nations that are susceptible to the will and whim of the Americans are better off not engaging in such projects in Iran. Indians appear to not only be susceptible, but they are also slow and inefficient at completing projects, especially when compared to the Chinese.
 
.
India’s Loss of Farzad-B is Only the Beginning

The PTI news agency has quoted ‘sources’ in New Delhi to the effect that the Farzad-B gas field project in Iran is slipping out of India’s hands. The curtain seems to have come down on the negotiations between the ONGC Videsh and Iran’s National Iranian Oil Company.

The official narrative is that there was a gap in pricing that couldn’t be bridged. Others say Iran lost interest.

Oil and gas are strategic minerals and it is only very rarely that ‘friendly price’ is offered. If at all, it will be for political reasons of an exceptional nature.

When it comes to Farzad-B gas fields, three other factors also come into play. One, the gas fields contain massive reserves (estimated to be around 21.7 trillion cubic feet.) That is to say, even tiny price variations can make exponential difference to Iran’s income.

Second, Iran may be sceptical about ONGC’s capacity to handle Farzad-B. ONGC Videsh is a minority shareholder in most of its projects overseas. It has 14 producing assets across several countries but depends predominantly (around 60 percent) on Russia for its annual output.

Recent reports suggested that due to a natural decline in fields and production cut commitments by key producers (following the OPEC+ decisions), ONGC Videsh is scaling down its capex plans (as, indeed, most upstream companies worldwide.)

Third, ONGC Videsh is also involved in exploration work in Israel as part of an Indian Consortium of government companies with participating interest of 25 percent. Now, Farzad-B is located on the Iran-Saudi maritime boundary in the Persian Gulf which is a hugely sensitive area.

Israel is increasingly a factor now in the geopolitics of the Gulf. Suffice to say, it was an incredibly foolish move on the part of the government to have pushed the ONGC Videsh into acquiring exploratory assets in Israel. (It followed PM Modi’s high-profile visit to Israel in July 2017.)

It seems the Modi government got bamboozled by the Israelis. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu does quick thinking usually, and his intention might have been to torpedo the ONGC Videsh’s Farzad-B project where the Indian company had successfully done exploration work as far back as in 2008, established the huge potential for business and was on the home stretch negotiating the terms for production and marketing.

The ONGC Videsh’s contract in Israel runs till 2021. A sensational report with a shrill title in the Oil Price magazine today suggests that Israelis are smirking that they successfully killed a mega energy project that would have given a massive boost to India-Iran relations for a very long time to come.

Meanwhile, a 25-year, $400 billion economic pact between China and Iran is in the final stages of approval. Iran’s foreign policies are pragmatic and flexible but far from ad-hoc. Iran is a regional power and in the long game globally.

If the estimation was that a stopover in Tehran by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar in September would mollify Iran, things didn’t happen exactly that way. The lesson from Farzad-B is: Friendship should not be taken for granted and a beneficial relationship needs to be based on mutual interest and mutual respect.

But the loss of Farzad-B is only the beginning. The India-Iran relationship awaits a strategic setback. Looking ahead, the forthcoming Malabar Exercise with Australia’s participation heralds a tumultuous period ahead where India and Iran’s core interests will no longer be reconcilable.

Without doubt, India’s Quad strategy will complicate its relations with Iran. None of the Persian Gulf states (or Israel) will want to be part of the Quad, either, since they are in the same predicament as the ASEAN countries — stakeholders in a thriving economic partnership with China.

As the Quad navvies cruise together “submarine-hunting” in the Indian Ocean from their bases in India or Diego Garcia, the military alliance will loom large in Iran’s security calculus as a security challenge, especially in the northern tier of the Arabian Sea where Iran has a string of naval bases.

To be sure, the unfolding militarisation of the Indian Ocean” will only be seen as an expansionist policy by a host of regional powers — not only China but also Pakistan, Iran and, possibly, Russia — and most littoral states along Africa’s east coast.

It will isolate India in its region and will provoke counter-strategies eventually to contain India’s ambitions. After all, there is nothing like absolute security. No amount of waffling by Indian diplomats that Quad is not be regarded as anything more than the BRICS or SCO will convince India’s neighbours.

 
.
Pakistan has a major role to play here, should be trying its earnest to prevent any Indian deals with any of our neighbours.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom