Iran beats morroco in World Cup

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

So let's get back to 1979. You have a coup d'état and some unknown Mullah (outside the borders of Iran) comes to power and one of the first things he says are hostile and threatening comments about "illegal Arab regimes" next door, "Makkah and Madinah being controlled by pagans" etc.

So fellow Arab neighbors should have supported non-Arabs and a hostile regime? Great logic.

The only Arab country that supported you was the Al-Assad dynasty in Syria and that was due to their silly Ba'athi rivalry with Iraq. The Syrian people were not in agreement.

Events in Syria have little to do with Iran if anything at all. Yes, I am sure that the 1000's of Iranians who have died in Syria for nothing agree.

Nobody is praising anyone. 99% of the Sahaba were Arabs. Likewise writers. Religion in the Arab world is dismissing as well in case you do not know. Islam too is just one of the many religions of Arabs and Semites. Our ancestors used to believe in the oldest recorded religions prior to Islam (millions are still Christians and Jewish - fellow Semitic religions).

No such ethnicity like Indo-Iranian (genetically proven ages ago), lol, and so-called Indo-Iranian figures can be counted on two hands. Most of them being Afghans/Tajiks and Persians from Eastern Iran. Arabized mind you. With Arabi names. That wrote in Arabic (language of science and culture back then). Muslims. Not Zoroastrians.

Anyway nobody cares. I don't care about how many Muslims there are. Although there are 1.4 billion or 1.6 (don't recall currently and don't bother to google). Islam is not the only religion of Arabs. Yet that influence alone predates anything on the Iranian side of the border. That's amazing considering that the oldest civilizations are found in the Arab world.

However luckily the trend to take pride in our glorious pre-Islamic history is gaining 1000's of Arab followers each day. That can easily be combined with Islam. We should take pride in all aspects of our history.

While you likes, despite following Islam for more than 50% of your recorded history as Iranians (2800 years), want to erase it, yet that will never happen. To erase it, is to erase most of Iran's current day culture. You erase your most visited places (tombs of dead Arabs), 1000's of elaborate mosques etc. What will be left will be a few newly built fire temples (or whatever they are called) in Yazd. I know that this frustrates you. It would frustrate me to death too if my people had suffered from the opposite for 1400 years. So I don't blame you.

Almost 50% of Islamic knowledge (how to pray, history of islam etc) is due to non-arabs. Almost all hadiths were written by Iranians. There is no doubt than a single Indo-Iranian (aryan) ethnic group existed 4000 years ago (not 2800) which eventually spread into what is today known as Pakistan, Iran, India, Afghanistan etc.

It will just go/be minimized/fade away, just like christianity in many places in Europe. They don't erase their culture, they just turn the church into a beautiful cafe or library.

Same can be done with nice mosques, which by the way already have plenty of Iranian architecture in them, so they were already partly Iranian.

We keep the places of death arabs to attract arab/international visitors and tourists which will bring money. We should polish them, spray them with perfumes and repair/repaint any damage to these buildings.

Culture is dynamic, it can be kept, revived, changed etc. I'm just seeing this trend/developement in the region and this is natural as you see trends in population growth. Time and education are responsible for this trend, both of them something that we can't stop.

 

[Saif al-Arab]

Almost 50% of Islamic knowledge (how to pray, history of islam etc) is due to non-arabs. Almost all hadiths were written by Iranians. There is no doubt than a single Indo-Iranian (aryan) ethnic group existed 4000 years ago (not 2800) which eventually spread into what is today known as Pakistan, Iran, India, Afghanistan etc.

It will just go/be minimized/fade away, just like christianity in many places in Europe. They don't erase their culture, they just turn the church into a beautiful cafe or library.

Same can be done with nice mosques, which by the way already have plenty of Iranian architecture in them, so they were already partly Iranian.

We keep the places of death arabs to attract arab/international visitors and tourists which will bring money. We should polish them, spray them with perfumes and repair/repaint any damage to these buildings.

Culture is dynamic, it can be kept, revived, changed etc. I'm just seeing this trend/developement in the region and this is natural as you see trends in population growth. Time and education are responsible for this trend, both of them something that we can't stop.

Complete and utter nonsense. A few Arabized Persians did nothing but collect what they were told by Arabs who converted them. They did not write anything new but a few of them made some works (copy paste) and collected it. Half of it is not even followed (impossible). Similar with what the Arabs collected.

A tiny amount of people, maybe. Some steppes nomads in modern-day Kazakhstan that left nothing to show for.

Andronovo says hello.

According to DNA 95% of all Iranians are native people to the Iranian Plateau.

That is why Southern Iranians (supposed original Persians) share more DNA in common with Arabians and Iraqis next door than with Pakistanis in Karachi or Afghans in Kandahar. And why Iranians in the North share more DNA in common with Caucasian speaking Georgians than Indo-Iranian speaking Tajiks 2000 km away. How do you explain this if your "theory" is right? (Proven incorrect by DNA tests but anyway, let's assume it was correct).

2800 years old is the concept of Iran, Persians and Iranians. Not 4000 years. Semites were around almost 5000 years ago though. Afro-Asiatic speaking peoples are the oldest recorded linguistic group in the world btw. But linguistics do not mean anything in terms of DNA. If that was the case Sri Lankans and Portuguese would be related while Portuguese are much more related with Arabs than Sri Lankans to use just one example.

Do whatever you want to do however I am afraid that you won't have much of a say personally nor will the facts that I mentioned change.

You foolishly think that Arabs only take pride in 1400 years of Islamic history and think that only Persians take pride in their pre-Islamic history. You should realize that the oldest civilizations are native to the Arab world. You should also realize that this is not 200 years ago. Today even the most conservative Arabs in say some remote traditional village like Ushaiger in Saudi Arabia, have access to the internet, archaeological information, genetics, history books etc. They know that what they have been taught by some deluded Islamist supremacists are bogus. The youth don't take it seriously anymore.

Speaking about Ushaiger (2000 year old village recently renovated - very nice job)

Well-informed Arabs have always taken pride in their glorious pre-Islamic history as well as their glorious Islamic history. Those are not opposites. Nobody is going to belief some nonsense Hadith written by God knows who (originally) to the exact word when science, archaeology proves it wrong easily.

I and most Arabs nowadays (informed) take pride in both aspects. While your likes want to only take pride in 1300 years of history and erase the other 1300 +. That's not going to happen. You just have to come to terms with history. Most Iranians appear to be trapped in events from 1400 years ago. Arabs, at least in stable Arab countries (vast majority) have totally different priorities.

For instance like this talented guy below;


How does his garden grow? Sustainably, in the desert

http://www.arabnews.com/node/1315006/saudi-arabia

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Complete and utter nonsense. A few Arabized Persians did nothing but collect what they were told by Arabs who converted them. They did not write anything new but a few of them made some works (copy paste) and collected it. Half of it is not even followed (impossible). Similar with what the Arabs collected.

A tiny amount of people, maybe. Some steppes nomads in modern-day Kazakhstan that left nothing to show for.

Andronovo says hello.

According to DNA 95% of all Iranians are native people to the Iranian Plateau.

That is why Southern Iranians (supposed original Persians) share more DNA in common with Arabians and Iraqis next door than with Pakistanis in Karachi or Afghans in Kandahar. And why Iranians in the North share more DNA in common with Caucasian speaking Georgians than Indo-Iranian speaking Tajiks 2000 km away. How do you explain this if your "theory" is right? (Proven incorrect by DNA tests but anyway, let's assume it was correct).

2800 years old is the concept of Iran, Persians and Iranians. Not 4000 years. Semites were around almost 5000 years ago though. Afro-Asiatic speaking peoples are the oldest recorded linguistic group in the world btw. But linguistics do not mean anything in terms of DNA. If that was the case Sri Lankans and Portuguese would be related while Portuguese are much more related with Arabs than Sri Lankans to use just one example.

Do whatever you want to do however I am afraid that you won't have much of a say personally nor will the facts that I mentioned change.

You foolishly think that Arabs only take pride in 1400 years of Islamic history and think that only Persians take pride in their pre-Islamic history. You should realize that the oldest civilizations are native to the Arab world. You should also realize that this is not 200 years ago. Today even the most conservative Arabs in say some remote traditional village like Ushaiger in Saudi Arabia, have access to the internet, archaeological information, genetics, history books etc. They know that what they have been taught by some deluded Islamist supremacists are bogus. The youth don't take it seriously anymore.

Speaking about Ushaiger (2000 year old village recently renovated - very nice job)

Well-informed Arabs have always taken pride in their glorious pre-Islamic history as well as their glorious Islamic history. Those are not opposites. Nobody is going to belief some nonsense Hadith written by God knows who (originally) to the exact word when science, archaeology proves it wrong easily.

I and most Arabs nowadays (informed) take pride in both aspects. While your likes want to only take pride in 1300 years of history and erase the other 1300 +. That's not going to happen. You just have to come to terms with history. Most Iranians appear to be trapped in events from 1400 years ago. Arabs, at least in stable Arab countries (vast majority) have totally different priorities.

For instance like this talented guy below;


How does his garden grow? Sustainably, in the desert

http://www.arabnews.com/node/1315006/saudi-arabia

So the great six as sunni islam calls them did not play a major role in Islam? come on, even if half of these hadiths are followed...
Even a school of Islam (hanafi) is made by an Iranian.
Iranians are mixture of natives like elamites and indo-europeans. There is much newer research which rejects this old youtube video of yours.
Even if we talk about genetics instead of language, oldest J2 and J1 are found in and near Iran.
Islam rejects pre-islamic arabia/idol worship etc, even speaks of religions such as christianity and judaism as corrupted, let alone other semitic religions.
250 years accupation by arabs does not make us reject 1400 years of our past.

Do you reject your history after mongol destruction of abbasids (together with the help of Parthian descened Iranian noble house of hethumids) ?

 

[SALMAN F]

Do you have any shame? A farsi talking about whores while his people are spreading their legs every single minute in the GCC?

You pathetic religiously, linguistically, ethnically and military conquered inferiority ridden entity by Arabs.

Your beloved Iran has not won a single freaking tournament in 42 years and here your fellow stateless Kurds (thread starter) are barking against Arabs while KSA has won the AFC Asian Cup (most important trophy in Asian football) 3 times and reached a joint record (South Korea has reached 6 finals too) 6 finals in the past 35 years. The last time you won a single trophy there were 1-2 professional teams in Asia. 3 years ago you were spanked by Arabs (Iraq) in the Asian Cup.

You have partiicaped in the World Cup 5 times in your history and only won 2 freaking games. 2-1 against the US in 1998 and thanks to an own goal in the 95th minute against a superior and better playing Morocco team a few days ago.

Do you know that KSA won 2 games at the World Cup back in 1994 and unlike your entity qualified to the Round of 16 where we barely lost to Sweden (semifinalists that year) and scored the best goal in the tournament?

The Saudi Arabia national football team (Arabic: المنتخب العربي السعودي لكرة القدم‎) represents Saudi Arabia in internationalfootball. The team's colours are green and white. Saudi Arabia are known as Al-Suqour (The Falcons) and Al-Akhdhar (The Green).

Considered one of Asia's most successful national teams, Saudi Arabia have won the Asian Cup three times (1984, 1988, and 1996), reached a joint record six Asian Cup finals and qualified for the World Cup four consecutive times ever since debuting at the 1994 tournament.

In the 1994 World Cup under the leadership of Jorge Solari, Saudi Arabia beat both Belgium and Morocco in the group stage before falling to Sweden in the Round of 16. Thus Saudi Arabia became the second Arab national football team in history to reach the Round of 16 in a World Cup, after Morocco's Round of 16 elimination in the 1986 FIFA World Cup, and one of the few Asian national football teams to accomplish such a feat to date.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia_national_football_team

Now you had your 5 minutes of fame and soon you will be spanked by Spain and Portugal (unless you will be 10 times luckier than you were against Morocco) and exit the group stage as always.

Not to mention that KSA has a population 3 times smaller and one of the worst generations in the past 30 years after dominating Asian football together with Japan in the past 30 years (club football too where Iranian teams are nowhere to be seen as usual). Zero trophies.

And who gives a **** about FIFA rankings. Anyone that knows just a bit about football know that they are useless and meaningless other than in relation to seedings. Just take a look at the freaking ranking and everyone can see that it means close to nothing.

KSA had a massive **** up against Russia (host playing in front of 80.000 people) and conceded (pathetically) 3 goals in the last 12 minutes despite having 62% of the possession. It does not reflect the strength of KSA when just 6 days prior Germany barely defeated KSA 2-1. 2 weeks ago Italy barely defeated KSA 2-1 as well.

Anyway 1 game does not erase 35 + years of history and achievements by KSA which are far superior to Iran that have won jack shit. Zero. Nothing. Since freaking 1976.

Russia is a vastly superior team than Morocco as well not to forget them being the host and playing at home in front of 80.000 of their own fans.

If KSA played as destructive and defensive football as you guys do and did, we might have managed a 0-0 draw but KSA's problem in the past few years is playing naively and offensively when the defense sucks hence the 62% possession against the host country Russia. That's because Arabs have more flair and are better technical players than you guys. Always have been and always will be. 3 new coaches in the past 12 months as well. All thanks to the idiotic FA. You have had the same manager for years. Playing the same destructive and defensive football using plenty of Iranians born abroad. Meanwhile KSA players were not allowed to even play abroad (outside of the GCC) until January this year.

Get out of here troll.

Welcome back to the battlefield after a warrior break

 

[Saif al-Arab]

So the great six as sunni islam calls them did not play a major role in Islam? come on, even if half of these hadiths are followed...
Even a school of Islam (hanafi) is made by an Iranian.
Iranians are mixture of natives like elamites and indo-europeans. There is much newer research which rejects this old youtube video of yours.
Even if we talk about genetics instead of language, oldest J2 and J1 are found in and near Iran.
Islam rejects pre-islamic arabia/idol worship etc, even speaks of religions such as christianity and judaism as corrupted, let alone other semitic religions.
250 years accupation by arabs does not make us reject 1400 years of our past.

Do you reject your history after mongol destruction of abbasids (together with the help of Parthian descened Iranian noble house of hethumids) ?

I believe that you know what collections are. You do not invent anything that was not invented before. Those writers collected information (sayings in this case) that were said (supposedly) by Arabs and later the first Arab scholars (the same ones that taught the only non-Arab founder of a Sunni Madhab - Abu Hanifa) taught the next generation and the next etc.

You are doing it again with the Hanafi fiqh. Same situation. Abu Hanifa was educated by Arab scholars who past their knowledge on. Born in Arab lands. Spoke Arabic. To a large degree he was Arabized without a doubt. Later Abu Hanifa added information from other Arab scholars and COLLECTED it.

Well, DNA tests prove otherwise. The overwhelming majority of Iranians are not descendants of Steppe nomads who lived in Kazakhstan 4000 years ago. Not anymore than Portuguese, Maltese, Sicilians and Spaniards are pure Arabs/Moors. Only a degree of admixture. Those so-called Indo-Iranian "genes" are also found in the Arab world, even in regions with no historical relationship to Indo-Iranian speaking peoples. Haplogroups predate ethnic groups by millennia so this makes sense. Even more so when the first people outside of Eastern Africa/Horn of Africa lived in Arabia and the wider Arab world (later on).

Haplogroup J (parent of J1 and J2) originates in the borderland of Arabia and Southern Sham/Levant. As do almost all the female haplogroups found in the Middle East.

So? Just like any other religion in history which claims supremacy. Does not change anything. Many practices in Islam derive from ancient historical Semitic religions followed in ancient Arabia, Yemen, Mesopotamia, Egypt, Levant etc. Even the word of God has remained.

Well, it seemed like that. Don't you want to erase 1400 years of Islamic history in Iran due to history and Arabs role in it?

BTW in pre-Islamic Arabia there were significant communities of monotheists. Hanifs, Jews, Christians. There were many ancient Semitic religions that were followed too. Even a community of Arab Zoroastrians supposedly in Eastern Arabia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_pre-Islamic_Arabia

Religions followed by historical personalities like Sargon of Akkad and Egyptian Pharaohs. What puritan Islamists think about that I could care less about. They can't change history or archaeological evidence. For all I care they can preach the destruction of all the 1000's of ancient heritage sites in Arabia and the Arab world. Vast, vast majority disagree and that is all that matters which is why their dreams will never be fulfilled. Similar to how some deluded Persian nationalists dreams of destroying mosques and toms containing dead Arabs (as we call them) and mosques. Not going to happen in this day and age. Millenia ago it was easier to erase previous religious particles and temples. It happened in Iran prior to Zoroastrianism (although there are remains), happened in Arabia and the Arab world (although there are numerous churches, synagogs and pre-Islamic temples) and it happened on an even wider scale in Europe to such an extent that there is not (almost) a single trace of pre-Christian temples in Europe outside of Scandinavia and the Baltic (longest pagan regions in Europe prior to Christianity).

Abbasids actually survived and ruled as Caliphs until 1517 before the Ottomans stole/took the Caliphate title and I don't know which Iranian (supposedly) dynasty you are talking about.

I would care if Mongols had any say today. For the past 600 years they have been humiliated and are reduced to 3.5 million or so people that recently gained independence and sandwiched between Russia and China. Not to say that we have had no contacts with them for 750 years and that their presence in the Arab world was very short until they were defeated in the Levant by Arabs and Turks 10 years later.

Actually Mongol destruction and genocide was much larger in Iran and Central Asia so if anything Iranians should hate Mongols more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_conquest_of_Khwarezmia

Mongols never reached Arabia either. A region that is basically impossible to rule and fully unite. Only modern-day Iraq and parts of Levant (where they were defeated).

Welcome back to the battlefield after a warrior break

My hands were itching for some action on good old PDF.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/arabic-coffee-shop.298944/page-356

 

[SALMAN F]

There is the persian gulf between us. Direct neighbours: Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Iraq, Azerbayjan, Pakistan, Armenia.
We cannot support federations and countries which show bad behaviour towards us in sports and supported saddam in war.

http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/...r-Saudis-disrespect-in-Champions-League-match

It's your free choice to like/love them. And that globalist internationalist puppet (pahlavi) who is shame to his father and grandpa is allowed to join you, together with pigface khamenei

Shapur do you mind if I ask you some questions since I can't read Farsi

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Shapur do you mind if I ask you some questions since I can't read Farsi

You're welcome..

 

[SALMAN F]

You're welcome..

Your ideology seems similar to the white nationalists and alex jones specially when comes to globalists and internationalists

Also the nationalist omid dana he is shah supporter but he hates the current Pahlavi also he hate mossadegh on his instagram he seems anti zionists anti israel he also seems to support the irgc not like the other Iranian shah supporters who consider israel as friend and Allie

 

[Ceylal]

Another so called Arab country crushed by old fox How ever I was Tunes fan over evil Queen's team

All the Arabs team showed their limits in a game of men...

Yeah, a 352 year old dynasty was a French creation which did not occupy Morocco until 1912. You are a genius!


What a bunch of steaming pile of BS. Morocco left the OUA of which was a founding member because they accepted the separatist Polisario Front as a member*. Morocco was invited to join GCC but refused to join**. Do you need more history lessons?
But I guess facts never stood in your way to make an *** out of yourself.
Source*
"Morocco left the OAU in 1984 when a majority of members voted to recognize the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, as the Polisario Front calls"
Sources**:
Amid Turmoil, GCC Extends Invitation to Jordan and Morocco


"North African Governments illegitimate; Syria's Butcher Legitimate." - Cylal

lol You are very confused.

Bunch of caca..Sad you don’t even know the history of a French and Western Sahraouis created country...
Morocco was a founder father of de l’OUA? Is that what they teach you in school?
And Morocco refused to be member of GCC, the area where Moh 6 prostitutes Morocco and all her inhabitant for money..It was the GCC that refused to be associated with your stinyn@sses , because they think that you are a lessor breed...They loved you so much, that they voted against you for the CM 2026..
You are a sad human being...

Welcome back to the battlefield after a warrior break

He never left...

 

[SubWater]

Hey Guys Egypt Quit the world cup and that again is another proof for my theory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow is resistance Day for Iran national Team.
If we resist for first 20 minutes I believe that we can come out from the game with point against Spain.

 

[lastofthepatriots]

Hey Guys Egypt Quit the world cup and that again is another proof for my theory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow is resistance Day for Iran national Team.
If we resist for first 20 minutes I believe that we can come out from the game with point against Spain.

Good luck.

 

[Rukarl]

Hey Guys Egypt Quit the world cup and that again is another proof for my theory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow is resistance Day for Iran national Team.
If we resist for first 20 minutes I believe that we can come out from the game with point against Spain.

You seriously think the IR team has any chance against Spain, really ? Are you that delusional ?

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Your ideology seems similar to the white nationalists and alex jones specially when comes to globalists and internationalists

Also the nationalist omid dana he is shah supporter but he hates the current Pahlavi also he hate mossadegh on his instagram he seems anti zionists anti israel he also seems to support the irgc not like the other Iranian shah supporters who consider israel as friend and Allie

I never followed who this alex jones guy is, but he seems an like an artist interested in money, populist who just wants followers, conspiracy guy.

Omid Dana is correct in many ways, however sometimes he goes to far in defending islamic republic.
I'm anti-globalist nationalist. Iran must only look after its own interest, even if that would mean a defence pact with israel for example. Iran must be aware of dangerous and failed internationalist ideologies like communism and islamism.

You seriously think the IR team has any chance against Spain, really ? Are you that delusional ?

Iran should play defensive and should go for counter attacks. Our goal should be realistic, that would be a 0-0 draw if we defend hard and have luck. Spain is a world class team, their manner of playing is like real madrid. A draw against Spain will be extremely difficult for Iran, it's like winning 4-0 against morocco. We can only hope.

 

[SALMAN F]

I never followed who this alex jones guy is, but he seems an like an artist interested in money, populist who just wants followers, conspiracy guy.

Omid Dana is correct in many ways, however sometimes he goes to far in defending islamic republic.
I'm anti-globalist nationalist. Iran must only look after its own interest, even if that would mean a defence pact with israel for example. Iran must be aware of dangerous and failed internationalist ideologies like communism and islamism.


Iran should play defensive and should go for counter attacks. Our goal should be realistic, that would be a 0-0 draw if we defend hard and have luck. Spain is a world class team, their manner of playing is like real madrid. A draw against Spain will be extremely difficult for Iran, it's like winning 4-0 against morocco. We can only hope.

Well I don't know what he says but not him all iranian nationalists are willing to support the mullahs/Islamists/khomeinists what ever so iran doesn't become like Syria and Libya or Iraq

Also I noticed they agree on many IRI points like support the iranian empire and iranian global influence like surenas for example also surenas said imperialism it's part of the iranian mentality weather religous Islamists or secular nationalists

 

[Shapur Zol Aktaf]

Well I don't know what he says but not him all iranian nationalists are willing to support the mullahs/Islamists/khomeinists what ever so iran doesn't become like Syria and Libya or Iraq

Also I noticed they agree on many IRI points like support the iranian empire and iranian global influence like surenas for example also surenas said imperialism it's part of the iranian mentality weather religous Islamists or secular nationalists

Not willing Iran to become like Syria or Iraq is only one aspect, but we should also have progress inside the country which is in hands of old pigfaced clerics at the moment. The only solution is the handover of the economy and management of the country to technocrats who only put Iran first. The only "ideology" which is prefered in Iran is Iran.

Meanwhile globalist rats (feminazis, liberalists who want to open casino's, gay activists who want to adopt children) from inside and overseas should be excluded, only skilled experts should be welcomed in Iran.

New constitution should be written wherein following aspects are written:
-Only parties are allowed to participate in politics which respect the unity and centralist character of Iran and Iranian government. Tribalist form of politics is not allowed.
-There is only one people/nation in Iran: Iranian nation. They have been responsible for building up and creating Iran.
-Individuals or organisations who insult Iran or Iranian identity can be persecuted.
-Iranian government is allowed to take measures which prevents the damage or destruction of Iranian identity inside Iran. The government can take measures about immigration/asylum, defence, economy, culture.
-No foreign funding of politicians or political parties is allowed.
-An Iranian department with its own minister should be created in the government, besides the minister of culture, with the task of reviving, controlling Iranian identity.

 

[SALMAN F]

Not willing Iran to become like Syria or Iraq is only one aspect, but we should also have progress inside the country which is in hands of old pigfaced clerics at the moment. The only solution is the handover of the economy and management of the country to technocrats who only put Iran first. The only "ideology" which is prefered in Iran is Iran.

Meanwhile globalist rats (feminazis, liberalists who want to open casino's, gay activists who want to adopt children) from inside and overseas should be excluded, only skilled experts should be welcomed in Iran.

New constitution should be written wherein following aspects are written:
-Only parties are allowed to participate in politics which respect the unity and centralist character of Iran and Iranian government. Tribalist form of politics is not allowed.
-There is only one people/nation in Iran: Iranian nation. They have been responsible for building up and creating Iran.
-Individuals or organisations who insult Iran or Iranian identity can be persecuted.
-Iranian government is allowed to take measures which prevents the damage or destruction of Iranian identity inside Iran. The government can take measures about immigration/asylum, defence, economy, culture.
-No foreign funding of politicians or political parties is allowed.
-An Iranian department with its own minister should be created in the government, besides the minister of culture, with the task of reviving, controlling Iranian identity.

What does he say in these videos?