What's new

International outcry over Russia-China veto on Syria

illusion8

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
12,232
Reaction score
-20
Country
India
Location
India
PARIS: Western and Arab powers on Saturday reacted angrily to Russia and China's veto of a Security Council resolution on the Syria crisis, but Moscow and Beijing insisted the text needed more work.

Russia, a long-time Syrian ally, and China had earlier vetoed a UN Security Council resolution condemning the Syrian government's deadly crackdown despite reports by Syrian activists that troops overnight had killed 230 civilians in the city of Homs.

Russia's UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin justified the veto by saying the proposed resolution "sent an unbalanced signal to the Syrian parties".

His Chinese counterpart Li Baodong said pushing through such "a vote when parties are still seriously divided ... will not help maintain the unity and authority of the Security Council, or help resolve the issue."

But the international community reacted with anger at the double veto, the second by the two countries since the start of the Syrian crisis a year ago.

UN leader Ban Ki-moon expressed deep regret, saying that it undermined the role of the United Nations, according to a statement.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy said the veto would encourage further crackdowns by the Syrian regime.

"The Syrian tragedy must stop," said Sarkozy in a statement issued through his office.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said Russia and China had let the Syrian people down.

They had, he said, "sided with the Syrian regime and its brutal suppression of the Syrian people in support of their own national interests."

Italian Foreign Minister Giulio Terzi termed the double veto "very bad news" while US ambassador Susan Rice described it as "shameful".

European Union chief diplomat Catherine Ashton also expressed regret at the vetoes.

"The time has come to speak with one voice and demand an end to the bloodshed and speak out for a democratic future for Syria," she said in a statement.

"We condemn the ongoing bloodshed and stand by the Syrian people against the repressive regime.

"We call on President Assad to end immediately the killing of civilians, withdraw the Syrian army from besieged towns and cities and step aside in order to make room for a peaceful transition for the sake of his country."

The European parliament expressed dismay and its president, Martin Schulz, urged Moscow and Beijing to "take their international responsibilities seriously".

London-based rights group Amnesty International called the veto a "shockingly callous betrayal" of the Syrian people.

Moscow and Beijing have acted in a "completely irresponsible" way, the London-based human rights group added.

Thirteen countries voted for the resolution with only Russia and China voting against. Both countries, as permanent members of the security council, have a veto power.

The draft resolution, put forward by Morocco, had called for an immediate end to all violence. It did not impose any sanctions, nor did it authorise military action.

International outcry over Russia-China veto on Syria - The Times of India
 
only russia and china has the independence and independent foreign policy to go against the west.

every other country is controlled by the west so they have no choice but to go with the west or face crushing consequences.

countries like india and japan are western colonies.

arab league is an american league with the name 'arab' in it.
its controlled by american puppet regimes.

well done russia and china.
stood upto the evil empire.
while all other countries surrendered meekly.
gutless.
western man says jump, they jump.

only the might of russia and china saved a syrian holocaust by nato.

russia and china are far too powerful to be controlled by the west.
 
^^I think the Chinese wanted to score some browny points with Russia without thinking with a level head.
 
article-2096728-1198C921000005DC-16_634x443.jpg


china sucks :sick:
 
West and Arabs are upset they werent given the cover of legitimacy to attack yet another country on false pretenses and bomb it to the stone age, just to change regime to puppets? I'm glad it didnt happened.

For those who dont know, it was decided over a decade ago to attack Syria, and its time has come now, same as Iran's.
 
only russia and china has the independence and independent foreign policy to go against the west.

every other country is controlled by the west so they have no choice but to go with the west or face crushing consequences.

countries like india and japan are western colonies.
white man says jump, they jump.

Like I said in another thread, are you refering to the time like during UN resolution on Libya, how India voted against it & our PM voceferously opposed it..

Or, is it during India's refusal to bow down to US & EU pressure against Iran Oil sanction?

If its a genuine reason, we even stand with you guys, remeber the last Environmental summit?

Brush up or mumb up..
 
the chinese (and the russians) have an age old reactionary model to western political stance. they have consistently shown that the oppose their western counterparts on political grounds, without the real demerits or merits of the case coming into picture. they oppose for opposition sake. it is a pavlovian doggy reaction.
 
Back
Top Bottom