What's new

Inside PAF

luckyyy

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
-1
other than the F-16s, PAF did not have a capable enough fighter for patrolling, as the minimum requirement
in the scenario under discussion was an on-board airborne intercept radar, exceptional agility and sufficient staying power. The F-7s had reasonably good manoeuvrability but lacked an intercept radar as well as endurance, while the Mirage-III/5 were sitting ducks for the air combat mission (even though an odd squadron had been retrofitted with a first-class radar which made it fit for the night interceptor role).
http://pakteahouse.net/2009/02/12/paf-in-kargil-a-paf-warrior-speaks-out/?like=1

The author is a PAF retired Air Commodore .
 
. .
looks like the author forgot the new falcons and jf 17.

Whats the no.of thunder in paf? Wiki says its 14
 
.
30 JFT in service bt they are for A2G role only

except short range AAM they still cant fire BVR

A2A variant of JFT with BVR integrated will enter into service by mid 2012 or early 2013.
 
.
30 JFT in service bt they are for A2G role only

except short range AAM they still cant fire BVR

A2A variant of JFT with BVR integrated will enter into service by mid 2012 or early 2013.

Seems inaccurate information. What is the source?

The Chinese radar should be able to handle SD-10.
 
. .
30 JFT in service bt they are for A2G role only

except short range AAM they still cant fire BVR

A2A variant of JFT with BVR integrated will enter into service by mid 2012 or early 2013.

It's not really so difficult to carry out A2A operation in J 17,all you need is good Radar.
 
.
On topic -Except F 16 ,there are none other which is dependebale in PAF.
JF 17 is short leg aircraft ,good for interceptor and air patrol.
 
.
Everyone must think that this is the U.S.A. we are talking about. U.S. is light years ahead in technology than Pakistan is. This is not a failure of Pakistan PAF. Pakistan does not have the technology that U.S. has. Anyways if Pakistan were able to intercept Seal Team Six, then what? Shoot them down? Can anyone of you imagine the repercussions?

U.S.A. did Pakistan a good thing. The nerve of this assh$$e bin Laden to hide out in an upscale city IN PAKISTAN AND coordinate attacks against Pakistanis and its establishment. This angers me to the core.
 
.
It's not really so difficult to carry out A2A operation in J 17,all you need is good Rada.

bt integrating radar takes years

nabil has confirmed the radar will be smaller version of J-10B AESA.

along with these more goodies will also join the JFT.
 
.
other than the F-16s, PAF did not have a capable enough fighter for patrolling, as the minimum requirement
in the scenario under discussion was an on-board airborne intercept radar, exceptional agility and sufficient staying power. The F-7s had reasonably good manoeuvrability but lacked an intercept radar as well as endurance, while the Mirage-III/5 were sitting ducks for the air combat mission (even though an odd squadron had been retrofitted with a first-class radar which made it fit for the night interceptor role).
PAF in Kargil : A PAF warrior speaks out | Pak Tea House

The author is a PAF retired Air Commodore .

paktea blog lacks credibility and is run by seculars and foreign funded self-defeatists who love talking about women rights cause they are gay and incapable of earning a living :lol:
 
. . .
paktea blog lacks credibility and is run by seculars and foreign funded self-defeatists who love talking about women rights cause they are gay and incapable of earning a living :lol:

:offtopic: those who talk about you is gay and lesbian ...........(Same rant all over in every thread)
 
.
Seems inaccurate information. What is the source?

The Chinese radar should be able to handle SD-10.

yes but still the BVR is not integrated on the JFT.

only one fighter JFT in china has been tested with SD-10

Info is from JFT thread and I think Hannan
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom