What's new

INS Aridhaman to be out soon. Here’s what you need to know about nuclear submarines

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
Arihant.jpg


CHENNAI: Later this month, defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman will launch India’s second indigenous nuclear submarine, INS Aridhaman. Following its launch, the new vessel will undergo sea trials and will be inducted into service no later than 2019.

A nuclear sub is something only a few countries can boast of. In fact, the induction of INS Arihant into service in 2016 made India the only country apart from the five permanent members of the UN Security Council to operate a homemade nuclear U-boat.

INS Aridhaman will carry twice as many missiles as INS Arihant besides travelling faster under water. It is fitted with eight launch tubes unlike its elder sister Arihant, which has only four. Further, experts say the new sub will carry K-15 and (the newer) K-4 ballistic missiles as does INS Arihant. K-4 is an intermediate range ballistic missile that can hit targets as far as 3500 km.

Aridhaman’s launch comes at a time of growing tensions in the Indian Ocean region. Analysts say there has been a spike in the Chinese naval presence in the Indian Ocean. Just days after India objected to China’s construction of a road on the Doklam plateau, India Today reported that a Chinese submarine surfaced in the Indian Ocean waters. Although the timing is interesting, it would be a mistake to ignore the larger picture. For quite some time now, China has been ratcheting up its presence in the region. Abhijit Singh, a former naval officer who heads the Maritime Policy Initiative at the New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation, said, “Since January this year, China has been able to establish a strong military and economic presence in the Indian Ocean region, with many South Asian states bending over backwards to accommodate Beijing’s regional initiatives.”

Strategic experts warn that China would use its superior naval might to choke India in the Indian Ocean in the event of a conflict. China’s growing trade with countries in Africa and West Asia means that maintaining access to the Indian Ocean is a priority for Beijing.

However, there is always a possibility that India and the US, which maintains a significant presence in the Indian Ocean, may see this Chinese naval activity as a threat to their own interests.

Further, the launch of INS Aridhaman comes just months after China announced the start of the sea trials of its first domestically built aircraft carrier. Locked in competition, New Delhi sees no option but to boost its own capability. One way of doing so is by building its own nuclear sub.

Nuclear Vs Conventional Submarines
Put simply, nuclear submarines are those that are powered by onboard nuclear reactors. Conventional submarines generate energy by burning diesel, which requires air. The energy is then stored in a battery, which powers the submarine. However, once power runs out, the vessel has to surface again. Since there is no need for air, nuke submarines can stay underwater for months. Also, they can cruise faster than conventional subs without their battery running out.

It is clear that a war between India and China is not likely to be limited to their disputed border. China would draw India into a confrontation in the Indian Ocean. As such, it is imperative for India to boost its Sea Control and Area Denial capability. Nuclear submarines have a vital role to play here. They help the navy retain full command of the sea. Their stealth features enable them to enter waters undetected and carry out surveillance and intelligence gathering activities. For instance, a nuclear submarine can lurk underwater and keep an eye on activities in the waters near the Chinese port of Hambantota in Sri Lanka. They can also be used to attack enemy ships that stray into India’s territorial waters.

It’s Not Easy To Spot A Submarine Underwater
Nuclear submarines are a useful tool because they can lurk deep under the sea undetected for months. It is not easy to locate these giant monsters once they plunge deep underwater. Why? Subs ply at the deep end of the ocean. They can lurk quietly for hours making it impossible for passive sonar to detect them. Even if active sonar waves are used, the fact remains that there are rock formations beneath the surface of the ocean. Thus, the sound waves reflected back to the surface may not give an accurate picture of what’s down there. More importantly variations in water temperature and pressure at different levels of the ocean damage the quality of sonar data. Further, surface ships make a lot of noise as they cruise through the waters. This alerts the crew of a submarine who can then take evasive measures before the sound waves are dropped.

Being hard to detect makes nuclear submarines ideal for carrying nuclear weapons. Strategic experts call this the “sea-basing of nuclear weapons”. This enables a country to retain a second-strike capability in case a first-nuclear strike by the enemy destroys all its land based nukes. “By virtue of its stealth and attendant survivability of second-strike capability, a nuclear submarine is particularly suited for nuclear deterrence,” says India’s Maritime Doctrine, a 2009 report by the Ministry of Defence.
See the Source>>
 
First Indigenous SSN is still 6-7 years away if Sandeep Unnithan is to be believed. Till then Russian Akula is all we have.

You can not use Russian sub in an actual war.
This is meant for training.
This is Russian property, which would be returned back to its actual owner = Russia.
Even Russian marine specialists are on board all the time.
 
You can not use Russian sub in an war.
This is meant for training.
This is Russian property, which would be returned back to its actual owner = Russiab
Even Russian marine specialists are on board all the time.
There's nothing which suggest why It can't be used in war. Its not Russian property till lease is over.... Its well armed and will be used in any war involves us.
 
There's nothing which suggest why It can't be used in war. Its not Russian property till lease is over.... Its well armed and will be used in any war involves us.

When you lease anything, the property title's name is not changed. The actual owner on the title certificate is Russia in this case.

Remember the basics of trade.

lease is a contract outlining the terms under which one party agrees to rent property owned by another party.

Lease synonym = Rent.

tem4r5t.png


Its so annoying to engage someone in dialogue who lacks the basics of trade terms.
 
When you lease anything, the property title's name is not changed. The actual owner on the title certificate is Russia in this case.

Remember the basics of trade.

lease is a contract outlining the terms under which one party agrees to rent property owned by another party.

Lease synonym = Rent.

View attachment 425468

Its so annoying to engage someone in dialogue who lacks the basics of trade terms.
That still didn't answer why It can't be used in war....When you claim something, show proof or you'll be simply called a moron!!!
 
That still didn't answer why It can't be used in war....When you claim something, show proof or you'll be simply called a moron!!!

Moron was one who did not know the basics of trade terms.
The ownership rights are different than tenet's rights.

You have had Russian submarine on lease in prior case. Did it have any actual (not dummy) weapon systems of its own installed in that submarine?

The submarine is meant only for training purposes and all its active missiles (Russian) are stripped off.
Why the Russian officers would fight India's war?
 
Here is Sandeep Unnithan's report for Ins Chakra in India Today back in 2012.

"The new submarine is free from critical restrictions imposed by the erstwhile Soviet Union on an earlier nuclear submarine acquired, also named Chakra, on a three-year lease in 1988. The old Chakra could not be used in war. The new one can."

http://m.indiatoday.in/story/ins-chakra-india-china-nuclear-powered-submarine/1/182353.html

@ashok321 now tell me who turned out to be a moron here?

You want to use a nuclear submarine with torpedoes and cruise missiles only?
For this you have your own diesel submarines.

Thank you for taking a detour in cruise missiles from nuclear ones that cant be used in Russian submarine.

What is the use of firing torpedoes from a nuclear sub and not nuclear missiles?
 
Here is Sandeep Unnithan's report for Ins Chakra in India Today back in 2012.

"The new submarine is free from critical restrictions imposed by the erstwhile Soviet Union on an earlier nuclear submarine acquired, also named Chakra, on a three-year lease in 1988. The old Chakra could not be used in war. The new one can."

http://m.indiatoday.in/story/ins-chakra-india-china-nuclear-powered-submarine/1/182353.html

@ashok321 now tell me who turned out to be a moron here?

I still don't understand why people engage themselves with this false flagger guy, most of the time he opens up a thread pointing to silly meme, tweets or any other random shit, and then keeps on pouring more filth by himself just to keep the thread alive. Pro tip: just ignore his post, seriously no one cares, I bet he might not be caring either.
 
Last edited:
You want to use a nuclear submarine with torpedoes and cruise missiles only?
For this you have your own diesel submarines.

Thank you for taking a detour in cruise missiles from nuclear ones that cant be used in Russian submarine.

What is the use of firing torpedoes from a nuclear sub and not nuclear missiles?
A SSN is supposed to carry torpedoes and cruise missile. It can carry it in far greater quantity and can operate in much faster speed with almost unlimited range( subject to food availability) compared to diesel submarine. Its supposed to be part of carrier battle group as diesel submarines cant cope up with range of a carrier.
 
You can not use Russian sub in an actual war.
This is meant for training.
This is Russian property, which would be returned back to its actual owner = Russia.
Even Russian marine specialists are on board all the time.
PNS khasi was leased by Pakistan from uncle sam,yet they sent to battlefield and got bursted under water. In war everything is fare. May be we will not fire nuke armed from Russian Skyla,but in the event of war we will use every thing what we have against your master.
 
A SSN is supposed to carry torpedoes and cruise missile. It can carry it in far greater quantity and can operate in much faster speed with almost unlimited range( subject to food availability) compared to diesel submarine. Its supposed to be part of carrier battle group as diesel submarines cant cope up with range of a carrier.

A nuclear submarine leased for 2.4 billion dollars to carry out torpedo attacks and not deliver any nuclear warheads?

Shame on Modi.

Thank you for explaining me the dynamics of (difference) between owning a diesel submarine (2 billion) and leasing a SSN for 2.4 billion only to be returned back to its owner after 10 years of expiration of lease terms.

Scorpene submarine does the same job with lesser funds, yet India's own - not leased.

What advantage do you have here?

As I said, these Submarines are specially meant for Indian crew familiarization of nuclear reactor which Indian crew lack. This is complicated naval manual.
They have to be graduated.
 
Back
Top Bottom