What's new

Indonesia Economy Forum

PAL Indonesia Minta Dukungan Pemerintah untuk Jadi Produsen Small Size LNG Carrier dan FSRU
Redaktur | Senin, 4/11/2019 12:04:24 | 709 Tampilan
Bagikan:
IMG_20191104_114523-960x540.jpg

JAKARTA – PT PAL Indonesia, Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) yang bergerak di sektor industri galangan kapal, kian memantapkan posisinya di sektor energi. Sutrisno, Direktur General Engineering & MRO PAL Indonesia, menegaskan PT PAL telah mampu mendesain dan membangun konstruksi badan kapal small size LNG (liquified natural gas) Carrier maupun FSRU (floating storage regasification unit), untuk kolaborasi khusus terkait tank design dan regasifikasi sistem. Mengingat selama ini tidak ada satupun perusahaan dalam negeri yang memiliki kemampuan dan pengalaman akan dua hal tersebut.

“Intinya, sejalan dengan komitmen pemerintah untuk menggalakkan TKDN (Tingkat Kandungan Dalam Negeri) di segala bidang maka PAL meminta dukungan pemerintah agar bisa menjadi pioner pembuat small size LNG Carrier & FSRU produk dalam negeri, karena selama ini masih impor untuk pengadaan dua produk tersebut,” kata Sutrisno kepada Dunia Energi, Senin (4/10).

Sutrisno mengatakan guna menjawab confidence level end user untuk menggunakan produk LNG Carrier dan FSRU buatan dalam negeri inilah maka pihaknya melakukan strategi partnership dengan proven own technology tank design dan regasification system.

“Kami jamin produk kami sesuai spesifikasi teknis, reliable dan good quality,” ujarnya.

Dia menambahkan, nominator partner PAL adalah perusahaan dari Korea dan masih terbuka dengan perusahaan asing lainnya selama memenuhi kualifikasi teknologi dan kompetitif dalam harga.

PT PAL sebagai shipbuilder akan berkolaborasi dengan perusahaan Korea untuk membangun small size LNG Carrier dan FSRU untuk kebutuhan pemenuhan infrastruktur distribusi gas di Indonesia.

“Skema bisnis siapa buyer or end user dari LNG Carrier dan FSRU ini sedang kita bicarakan dengan PT PLN (Persero), PT Pertamina (Persero) dan perusahaa privat dalam dan luar negeri yang siap menjadi investor yang akan mensuplai gas untuk PLN atau smelter/refinery di Indonesia,” tandas Sutrisno.(RA)

https://www.dunia-energi.com/pal-in...adi-produsen-small-size-lng-carrier-dan-fsru/
 
Home Ekonomi Berita Bisnis
Jokowi Diminta Beli Beras dan Gula dari India
CNN Indonesia
Senin, 04/11/2019 11:11
Bagikan :
d75866d5-9e4f-471e-a8e6-0686cb111ec4_169.jpeg

Presiden Jokowi dan PM India Narendra Modi. (CNN Indonesia/Christie Stefanie).
Jakarta, CNN Indonesia -- Pemerintah India menyetujui persyaratan Indonesia terkait ekspor kelapa sawit. Sebagai timbal balik, Indonesia diminta membeli beras dan gula dari India.

Menteri Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Airlangga Hartarto, dalam pertemuan puncak KTT ASEAN di Thailand, mengatakan pemerintah menyepakati hal tersebut dan akan melakukan pembelian secara bertahap. "Nanti bisa ditingkatkan sesuai dengan kebutuhan ke depan," ujarnya, mengutip Setkab.go.id, Senin (4/11).

Menurut Airlangga, neraca perdagangan antara RI dengan India tercatat positif. "Kita positif US$8 miliar, tertinggi pada 2017 lalu sebesar US$10 miliar, dengan komoditas utamanya adalah batu bara dan kelapa sawit," terang dia.

Lebih lanjut ia menyebut tarif kelapa sawit, baik untuk minyak kelapa sawit (CPI) maupun RBD sudah sama. "Semula ada perbedaan 5 persen, namun sesuai dengan permintaan bapak Presiden, PM Narendra Modi menerima sehingga tarif CPO itu sama, RBD itu, sama," imbuhnya.

Lihat juga:
Redam Perang Dagang, AS Berpotensi Batalkan Tarif Mobil Impor Pada kesempatan yang sama, Presiden Joko Widodo (Jokowi) melakukan pertemuan bilateral dengan Perdana Menteri India Narendra Modi. Dalam pertemuan itu, Modi menekankan dukungannya terhadap sentral ekonomi di ASEAN.

Tak cuma itu, Menteri Luar Negeri Retno Marsudi menuturkan Jokowi juga membahas mengenai permasalahan sawit. "Intinya adalah PM Modi siap memberikan perlakuan yang fair (adil) terhadap sawit Indonesia," katanya.
 
5 percent is still Okay though from previous prediction of 5.2 %

World Bank downgrades Indonesia growth outlook, calls for reforms on grim global economy

  • Marchio Irfan Gorbiano
    The Jakarta Post
PREMIUM
Jakarta / Fri, October 11, 2019 / 08:22 am
2019_10_05_80425_1570252950._large.jpg


Workers at a garment factory in Ungaran, Semarang, Central Java, carry out short daily exercise in between work on Thursday, Oct. 3.(Jakarta Post/Ardila Syakriah)
5
Shares
The World Bank has cut Indonesia’s economic growth forecast for 2019, calling for reforms for East Asia and Pacific economies as they will be under long-term threat from increasing global trade tensions.

Indonesia’s economy is projected to grow by 5 percent this year, the lowest annual economic growth since 2016, according to the October 2019 edition of the World Bank’s East Asia and Pacific Economic Update published on Thursday.

The 0.2-percentage-point cut from April’s forecast for Indonesia is in line with a broad-based deterioration in the economic growth outlook for the developing East Asia and Pacific region, excluding China, which is seen at 4.9 percent. The World Bank previously expected the region to grow 5.2 percent.

The lower growth projection reflects weakening global demand and heightened uncertainty around ongoing United States-China trade tensions that have led to a decline in exports and investment growth, testing the resilience of the region, according to the report, titled “Weathering Growth Risks”.

Therefore, countries in the region need to take an “active policy response” by using monetary and fiscal policy tools to stoke growth, said lead economist for East Asia and the Pacific, Andrew Mason.

“It would be important for countries to enact structural reforms to enhance competitiveness, improve business environments, attract investment and encourage innovations,” Mason said in a teleconference from Bangkok on Thursday. “These reforms are important for countries in East Asia and the Pacific even in good times, but they are particularly important this moment in an increasingly difficult international economic development.”

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Asian Development Bank (ADB) previously cut economic growth prospects for the world and for Asia, respectively. The World Trade Organization (WTO) slashed its global trade growth outlook significantly to 1.2 percent this year from a previous forecast of 2.6 percent.

“As growth slows, so does the rate of poverty reduction,” said Victoria Kwakwa, World Bank vice president for East Asia and the Pacific.

Seven million more people than the World Bank projected in April live with less than US$5.50 a day, rounding up to make almost a quarter of the population in the region living below the upper-middle-income poverty line.

For Indonesia, “despite recent progress in poverty reduction, one continuing challenge is to reduce inequality among regions in the country”, according to a section on Indonesia in the World Bank’s new report.

Prolonged trade tensions between China and the US, a fast-paced economic slowdown in China, European economies and the US, as well as Brexit uncertainty, could further weaken the global economy, as World Bank warns that downside risks to East Asia and Pacific’s growth prospects have intensified.

Although many countries expect to gain from the trade war-driven reconfiguration of the global trade landscape, the World Bank argued that the inflexibility of global value chains limits the upside for countries in the region in the near term. East Asia and Pacific countries will find it difficult to replace China’s role in global value chains because of inadequate infrastructure and small-scale production, according to the report.

The World Bank’s lead economist for Indonesia, Frederico Gil Sander, said rolling out reforms would be key in making Indonesia become more integrated with the global supply chain. One crucial policy recommendation is to ease import procedures for key capital goods that are needed for production processes.

“These days, global supply chains involve many countries importing and exporting,” said Sander. “So, this facility to import key inputs [goods] is actually key to attract export-oriented investments that create good jobs that pay better wages and also help in the long-term with the current account.”

On a regional level, Mason added that it was important for countries in East Asia and the Pacific to deepen regional integration frameworks such as ASEAN’s Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) as a buffer against increased levels of uncertainty in the global environment.

Indonesia’s economic growth is seen picking up in 2020 and 2021 to 5.1 percent and 5.2 percent, respectively, after this year’s slowdown, World Bank estimates show.

The short-term pickup reflects a positive outlook in terms of accelerated growth in investments, which booked sluggish growth due to uncertainties surrounding the April presidential and legislative elections, Sander said.

Expansions in productivity and the labor force would also aid growth in the upcoming years on the back of the government’s focus on human capital development and investment.

“Though slower, investment growth is expected to remain robust, especially after the elections, with reduced political uncertainty and an improvement in business sentiments due to proposed reforms to attract FDI [foreign direct investment],” reads the World Bank report.

Investors are highly anticipating President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s upcoming Cabinet members, especially the new economic team, to push for structural reforms to jack up growth, said Center of Reform on Economic (CORE) Indonesia executive director Mohammad Faisal.

“If [the government] seriously conducts structural reforms and has a solid Cabinet, that would likely mean higher growth prospects,” Faisal said.

While policymakers have rolled out policies in their structural reform agenda to boost economic growth, from removing investment barriers to aggressive monetary policy easing, Faisal said businesses would likely want low-hanging fruit, with swift policy effects generating immediate impacts on the economy.

https://www.thejakartapost.com/news...calls-for-reforms-on-grim-global-economy.html
 
How Indonesia Avoided Brazil’s Economic Fate
Two large, developing countries, opposite economic trajectories.

By James Guild
August 23, 2019
thediplomat-money-3431772_1280.jpg

Credit: Pixabay
In 2014, Brazil’s previously steady economic growth came to an abrupt halt, with GDP contracting by around 8 percent during 2015 and 2016. This economic malaise, along with a high-level government corruption scandal, opened the door for far-right candidate Jair Bolsonaro to win the presidency in 2018. However, his economic policies have failed to turn things around, and the economy shrank again in the first quarter of 2019. Brazil is one of the largest economies in the world, and the rise of a right-wing leader with authoritarian tendencies unable to arrest its economic struggles is troubling. Where did Brazil go wrong?

A look at Indonesia’s economy during the same time period can help answer that question. Both countries share many similar structural features – large populations in excess of 200 million, big current account deficits, a dominant role in the economy for state-owned companies, and significant commodity export sectors. Moreover, their respective currencies both came under pressure during the Taper Tantrum of 2013, when the U.S. Federal Reserve began winding down its quantitative easing program and sparked capital flight in emerging markets.

Yet their fates have been very different. Since 2014 Indonesia’s economy has grown steadily at around 5 percent per year. This led to the comfortable re-election of the incumbent president Joko “Jokowi” Widodo on the back of his popular pro-growth economic policies in April 2019, and he looks set to have a decent legislative coalition backing his second term in office. The economy is growing and the political environment is relatively stable. How did Indonesia manage to avoid Brazil’s fate, despite being exposed to many of the same potential weaknesses?

One way was better allocation of foreign investments. After the Global Financial Crisis, as central banks in developed countries slashed interest rates to near zero, foreign investment began to flow into emerging markets like Brazil and Indonesia as they offered higher rates of return. In Indonesia, much of this took the form of more stable and productive foreign direct investment, which was channeled into productive long-run investments like expanding the country’s stock of fixed capital.

Foreign investment in Brazil meanwhile went primarily to more volatile portfolio investments, such as stocks and bonds. As these instruments are more liquid, they can be sold off more quickly during times of capital flight. Brazil also saw a large expansion of domestic debt, eventually exceeding 100 percent of GDP despite no increase in domestic savings. This means the higher debt load was likely financed by inflows of foreign cash, and when the currency came under pressure servicing that debt became a struggle.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

The fiscal dimension also played an important part. When Jokowi took office in 2014, he immediately embraced expansionary fiscal policy, pouring tens of billions of dollars into building roads, hospitals, airports, and power plants. Some of this took the form of direct government outlays, but state-owned companies have also tapped capital markets to finance their efforts and investment inflows from abroad have remained strong. This helped offset contractionary pressure from Taper Tantrum-induced capital flight, and it has also significantly upgraded the country’s lagging infrastructure.

Brazil, by comparison, did the exact opposite. Not only did the government not try to spend its way out of the recession, it imposed heavy-handed austerity measures that effectively froze public spending at 2016 levels. The result has been years of painful economic contraction, political upheaval, and no clear path out of the situation.

The experience of these two countries contains important lessons for emerging markets. Running a current account deficit is not inherently a kiss of death, as long as capital inflows are being directed toward productive purposes like increasing output, and not into speculative liquid financial instruments and the expansion of domestic debt. It also provides solid evidence that in the face of currency volatility and contractionary pressure, the state that embraces expansionary fiscal policy has a better chance of weathering the storm and coming out intact.

As fears of global recession rise, Indonesia’s experience in side-stepping Brazil’s fate is a timely lesson for both emerging and developed economies.

James Guild is a Ph.D. Candidate in Political Economy at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore. His work has previously appeared in The Diplomat, New Mandala, East Asia Forum and Jakarta Post. Follow him on twitter @jamesjguild

https://thediplomat.com/2019/08/how-indonesia-avoided-brazils-economic-fate/
 
Presiden Jokowi dan PM India Narendra Modi. (CNN Indonesia/Christie Stefanie).
Jakarta, CNN Indonesia -- Pemerintah India menyetujui persyaratan Indonesia terkait ekspor kelapa sawit. Sebagai timbal balik, Indonesia diminta membeli beras dan gula dari India.

IMO I don't see any problem of importing sugar from India, however I'm not sure what kind of rice India could offer, and I seriously doubt they could produce better rice than our own farmers.
 
IMO I don't see any problem of importing sugar from India, however I'm not sure what kind of rice India could offer, and I seriously doubt they could produce better rice than our own farmers.

India and Pakistan produce Basmati variants and they are exported exclusively only Basmati variants
 
India and Pakistan produce Basmati variants and they are exported exclusively only Basmati variants

Indonesians like the taste of Basmati?

In 2017, total import of rice by Indonesia was around 174 mil USD worth (so not really gonna matter much for indian exports tbh):

https://oec.world/en/visualize/tree_map/hs92/import/idn/show/1006/2017/

For sugar, definitely India can make some good ground here for Indonesian import given the traditional suppliers and market size:

https://oec.world/en/visualize/tree_map/hs92/import/idn/show/1701/2017/
 
Indonesians like the taste of Basmati?

In 2017, total import of rice by Indonesia was around 174 mil USD worth (so not really gonna matter much for indian exports tbh):

https://oec.world/en/visualize/tree_map/hs92/import/idn/show/1006/2017/

For sugar, definitely India can make some good ground here for Indonesian import given the traditional suppliers and market size:

https://oec.world/en/visualize/tree_map/hs92/import/idn/show/1701/2017/

Dont know the excact data, but many Indonesian prefer Asian white rice variants compared to Basmati as Indonesian (Nusantara) people had conduct millenum long trade relationship with Gujarati, Bengal and Punjab trader, if we more prefer Basmati it will be since long time ago we had trying to cultivate them in large number . But thats not the case. Government is imported them by Bulog to increasing the rice stock at government owned silos and sometimes mixed them with other white rices. The move solely done as precaution against possible hike in price of rice.

In the past Java is main supplier of Indonesia sugar products. But the rising of Industry area and massive urbanization in whole Java (especially in Northern central Java coastland in which the most ideal area to cultivate sugarcane) push the sugar industry in Java into halved from their prime condition.

https://cci-indonesia.com/produksi-tebu-indonesia/
 
Indonesians like the taste of Basmati?

In 2017, total import of rice by Indonesia was around 174 mil USD worth (so not really gonna matter much for indian exports tbh):

https://oec.world/en/visualize/tree_map/hs92/import/idn/show/1006/2017/

eeech....... I personally prefer rice produced at Java island, and receive the blessing from the goddess Sri (Lakshmi for you Indian) with the field receive warming from the magma chamber underneath. And I believe the deal just included as part of a counter trade offset.

I believe the trade / counter trade was discussed by both leaders in the sideline of ASEAN Summit

 
Last edited:
75 percent of our export is from manufacturing sector.

News Focus
Metamorphosing Indonesia's economy toward competitive manufacturing
29th October 2019

Target-Produsen-Tekstil-Dan-Pakaian-Nasional-080918-ysw-4.jpg


Workers of a garment industry PT Citra Abadi Sejati in Bogor, West Java. Textile industry is one of five manufacturing sectors set as priorities in the Making Indonesia 4.0 Roadmap. (ANTARA JABAR/Yulius Satria Wijaya/agr/18/sh)

Joko Widodo (Jokowi), during his presidential inaugural address, demarcated five priorities for his second five-year term (2019-2024), one of them being transforming the country's industry, from reliance on natural resources to manufacturing competitiveness.

"We must transform, from depending on natural resources to manufacturing competitiveness and modern services that have high added values for prosperity of the nation and for social justice for all Indonesian people," Jokowi had stated on Oct 20, 2019.

The four other priorities are human resources development, infrastructure development, regulation simplification, and bureaucracy simplification.

Four days later while chairing the first plenary meeting of his new cabinet, the president reiterated the necessity to ease requirements for industries that can boost Indonesia's exports.

"I have repeatedly conveyed this statement. If there are export-oriented industries or those intending to produce substitute goods for importing, please do not take too long to sign (the documents of approval)," he told cabinet members at the meeting.

Incentives must be awarded to industries oriented towards export increase and those producing goods to substitute imports.

Related news: Jokowi chairs foremost plenary meeting of Indonesia Onward Cabinet

President Jokowi also remarked that the central and regional governments must fix targets for the creation of more job opportunities. To this end, those industries able to provide jobs should be served well.

The head of state called for improving the quality of human resources to meet the requirements of Industry 4.0, supported by five main technologies, notably the Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Machine Interface, robotic and sensor technology, and 3D printing.

Indonesia must develop hardworking, dynamic, and skilled human resources also mastering in technology and sciences, he stated.

After the meeting, new Industry Minister Agus Gumiwang, who succeeded Airlangga Hartarto, spoke of his plans to revitalize the manufacturing industry to boost growth.

"Breakthroughs must be sought for this, and we know that Indonesia's market size is quite good," he remarked.

Related news: New minister to revitalize manufacturing industry for growth

Indonesia has had the Making Indonesia 4.0 Roadmap for implementing Industry 4.0, which is the fourth industrial revolution triggered by technological advancements, such as computers, robots, and the Internet, among other things.

The nation believes that the implementation of Industry 4.0 will usher in viable opportunities to revitalize the manufacturing sector and serve as a driver to realize Indonesia’s vision to rank among the world’s top 10 economies in 2030.

The application of Industry 4.0 is forecast to generate more specific job opportunities, precisely those where high competencies are required. Thus, it is deemed necessary to transform the skills of Indonesia’s industrial human resources to better adapt to the information technology sector.

In the meantime, Indonesia's exports of manufactured goods during the January-September 2019 period had reached US$93.7 billion, constituting 75.51 percent of the country's total exports at $124.1 billion, the then Industry Ministry Airlangga Hartarto had stated on Oct 16, 2019.

During the January-September 2019 period, the country's balance of trade also recorded a surplus from the manufacturing industry, including the food industry, with $11.8 million; garment industry, at $5.6 million; and the paper and paper products industry, with $3 million

"The manufacturing industry that contributed over 75 percent (of the total exports) has broken the notion that our national exports fully comprise (unprocessed) commodities. This means the downstream industry plays a role in increasing added value, and our products are becoming competitive in the global market," Hartarto noted in a statement.


That achievement is owing to the Industry Ministry's strategic steps directed at accelerating the transformation of Industry 4.0 in the country’s manufacturing sector.

Related news: Government formulates strategic measures to accelerate Industry 4.0

The strategic steps entail driving productivity, increasing the competitive edge of export products, and strengthening manufacturing structures, Ngakan Timur Antara, the head of Industrial Research and Development (BPPI) at the Industry Ministry, noted in a statement recently.

"To achieve the target, we need to create a conducive investment climate and galvanize activities for the development of resources, drive potential economic sectors, and keep our macroeconomic condition stable," he explained.

He expressed belief that the matter would materialize if ministries were to synergize and collaborate with all related stakeholders.

"We must realize the commitment together. To accelerate it (the realization of the commitment), we need to direct transformation towards Industry 4.0," he remarked.

He noted that the Industry Ministry had assessed the level of preparedness on the part of several domestic industrial sectors to drive transformation in pursuit of Industry 4.0.

The food and beverage, textile and garment, chemical, automotive, and electronic industries were among the priority sectors to implement the first phase of transformation in accordance with the roadmap for "Making Indonesia 4.0," he stated.

"We call the indicator to assess Indonesia’s level of industry readiness in implementing Industry 4.0 as Industry 4.0 Readiness Index (INDI 4.0). The objective is to see the level of preparedness of industries that we can assess. In addition, we have built the ecosystem of industry 4.0 and developed the concept of green industry," he remarked.

The ministry expects INDI 4.0 (Ecosystem Indonesia 4.0), the ecosystem of Industry 4.0, to be able to serve as a means to build synergy and collaboration among parties to accelerate transformation towards Industry 4.0.

The Industry Ministry has, until now, conducted an assessment of 326 manufacturing companies, and the results indicate that several of them were ready for transformation towards Industry 4.0.

Furthermore, the ministry has provided technical guidance to both managers and engineers of companies on transformation towards Industry 4.0.

Related news: "Making Indonesia 4.0" roadmap to be highlighted in Hannover Messe
By Fardah
Editor: Sri Haryati
COPYRIGHT © ANTARA 2019

https://en.antaranews.com/news/1355...sias-economy-toward-competitive-manufacturing
 
eeech....... I personally prefer rice produced at Java island, and receive the blessing from the goddess Sri (Lakshmi for you Indian) with the field receive warming from the magma chamber underneath. And I believe the deal just included as part of a counter trade offset.

I believe the trade / counter trade was discussed by both leaders in the sideline of ASEAN Summit


Yah I also find basmati overrated. Just it has become somewhat the "premier" strain due to dominance in Punjabi culture export when it comes to "India".

I like my hardier, stockier strains in South India for rice too....making for idli/dosai as well. In fact idli (steamed rice+lentil patty) has been suggested to have come from/influenced by our ancient trade with Indonesia (Java, Sumatra...these all have old Tamil names...which says a lot).

It is in deep core genetics, these preferences sometimes :D. Yes our rice in south has a similar blessing (into the land) of fertility/farming deities. We know these deep down too (culturally + heritage), whereas for basmati, we do not (very different area of India).
 
Late news

Home / Berita Ekonomi Bisnis / Detail
Selasa, 05 Nov 2019 13:20 WIB

59 Pengusaha Asal China Mau Pindahkan Pabriknya Ke Jawa Tengah
Achmad Dwi Afriyadi - detikFinance

2c39058f-60f1-4d27-bc16-3d5e7fc64c97_169.jpg
Ilustrasi/Foto: Internet/ebcitizen.com
lg.php

Jakarta - Sebanyak 59 investor asal China bakal memindahkan atau merelokasi pabriknya ke Jawa Tengah. Investor itu bergerak di sektor industri kayu dan furnitur.

Kepala Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal (BKPM) Bahlil Lahadalia mengatakan salah satu kunci investor merealisasikan investasinya adalah semua harus terjun ke lapangan.

"Kuncinya kita bantu investor eksekusi sampai pabriknya jadi. Semua harus turun ke lapangan," kata Bahlil menanggapi 59 investor asal China yang akan merelokasi pabriknya ke Jawa Tengah dalam keterangan tertulis, Selasa (5/11/2019).


Baca juga: Jabar Incar Peluang Maraknya Relokasi Pabrik dari China

Bahlil menjelaskan, salah satu penyebab hijrahnya investor tersebut ke Jawa Tengah lantaran pelayanan perizinan di Jawa Tengah sangat baik.

"Salah satu alasannya karena pelayanan perizinan di Jawa Tengah adalah yang terbaik dimana menjadi peringkat pertama sebagai penyelenggara Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (PTSP) Terbaik se-Indonesia dalam acara Investment Award 2018. Tentunya ini bukti bahwa pemerintah sudah support. Perizinan mudah menjadi modal utama dalam mengundang investasi," paparnya.

Baca juga: Mafia Tanah Biang Kerok 33 Perusahaan Pilih Vietnam Ketimbang RI

Bahlil juga mengatakan, BKPM dan Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah terus berkolaborasi untuk meningkatkan investasi industri furnitur di Jawa Tengah. Hal ini sejalan dengan pesan Presiden Joko Widodo (Jokowi) agar pemerintah proaktif menangkap peluang investasi relokasi pabrik furnitur dari perusahaan perusahaan yang terkena dampak perang dagang Amerika Serikat (AS) dan China.

"Kami (BKPM) sudah beberapa kali mempertemukan pengusaha-pengusaha furnitur di luar negeri dengan pelaku industri furnitur lokal. Harapannya agar mereka segera dapat bermitra dan membuat pabriknya di Jawa Tengah," jelasnya.

Sebagai tambahan, diberitakan sebelumnya bahwa sebanyak 11 perusahaan asal China akan direlokasi. Targetnya sebelum akhir tahun proses relokasi tersebut bisa selesai dan segera melakukan produksi. September lalu, BKPM juga mencatat sebanyak 33 perusahaan asal negeri Tirai Bambu itu akan direlokasi, sebagai imbas dari perang dagang.
 
It is in deep core genetics, these preferences sometimes :D. Yes our rice in south has a similar blessing (into the land) of fertility/farming deities. We know these deep down too (culturally + heritage), whereas for basmati, we do not (very different area of India).

But unlike in Java, your paddy field still lack the warming from the magma chamber underneath :p:
 
Back
Top Bottom