Indonesia Defence Forum

[Nike]

LSU-02 Lapan Pecahkan Rekor Terbang



Pesawat LSU-02 LAPAN ketika di ujicoba di KRI TNI AL [wikipedia]☆

Pesawat tanpa awak LAPAN Surveillance UAV (LSU)02 sukses melakukan pemotretan udara untuk batas wilayah desa di Kecamatan Kretek, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) pada 1 hingga 5 Maret 2017.

Sebelum misi pemotretan udara, tim terlebih dahulu lakukan uji terbang pesawat. Hal ini dimaksudkan agar pesawat LSU berada dalam performa mesin terbaik serta mendapat settingan sistem avionik terefektif, guna meminimalisir shock wave air sebelum misi pemotretan udara dilakukan.

Pesawat LSU-02 dibekali mesin 33 cc. Dalam misi ini, LSU02 lepas landas dari Landasan Federasi Aerosport Indonesia (FASI) Pantai Depok, DIY. Pesawat terbang dengan kecepatan rata-rata 100 km per jam dengan ketinggian pemotretan 500 dan 750 meter di atas permukaan tanah.

Pesawat LSU terbang sesuai way pointdengan jarak 250 kilometer yang ditempuh dalam durasi dua jam sepuluh menit. Jarak ini merupakan rekor baru LSU-02 untuk misi pemetaan pesawat tanpa awak.

PIC Safety Assurance Engineer (SAE) Pusat Teknologi Penerbangan LAPAN, Agus Harno Nurdiansyah bersyukur atas kesuksesan misi ini, “Alhamdulillah dengan loyalitas, keikhlasan dan kerja keras dari seluruh anggota tim misi pemotretan udara dapat dilakukan dengan baik. Semua jerih payah di lapangan terbayar.”

Kepala Pusat Teknologi Penerbangan LAPAN, Gunawan S. Prabowo, mengapresiasi hasil kerja tim dalam misi kali ini. Ia berharap, keberhasilan ini dapat meningkatkan kekompakan, sikap saling mengisi, keterbukaan, mental, dan diskusi untuk misi-misi selanjutnya.

Misi kali ini merupakan lanjutan implementasi kerja sama antara LAPAN dengan Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG). Kegiatan ini bertujuan sebagai salah satu upaya menentukan standardisasi pemetaan menggunakan UAV, baik secara teknis maupun administratif. Secara teknis, standardisasi harus sesuai kriteria yang diinginkan oleh pemangku kepentingan. Sementara itu, secara administratif juga harus memenuhi perizinan.

Kegiatan ini menghasilkan rangcangan Norma Standar Prosedur Kriteria (NSPK) yang akan dikaji sebalum menjadi Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI). Standar ini nantinya menjadi aturan baku pemetaan. Dalam upaya ini, BIG juga mengundang berbagai praktisi untuk memberikan masukan dalam penyusunan standardisasi pemetaan dengan teknologi pesawat tanpa awak.

Diharapkan, di masa yang akan datang, perkembangan UAV akan semakin maju baik dari sisi flight safety dan flight performance. Dengan demikian, teknologi ini akan mampu mendukung akuisisi data untuk kebutuhan skala besar.

☠ LAPAN

Indonesian made UAV, LSU 02 had passed mapping testing and flight endurance testing in accordance to Indonesian Information Spatial Agency criteria and standard.

 

[kaka404]

A nation wit h fantastic potentiality and resources, as well as a strategic location, Indonesia ought to fulfill the visions of Sukarno. She must strive to become a regional power and the eastern arm of resurgent Muslims. A security and diplomatic alliance of Turkey, Pakistan and Indonesia - who are the other leading Muslim powers, will benefit regional Muslims. For a start Indonesia must become a nuclear power.

define becoming a nuclear power?? is it to be a country that has nuclear weapon(s) or country that utilize nuclear energy for power generation, research and industries?
if it's the first, then i'm afraid that that'll will not gonna happen anytime soon. indonesia has ratified NPT since the 70s and promoting it globally still. and i hope will continue to do so.
if it's the later then fyi indonesia has been utilizing nuclear energy since the late 50s for research and industries. for electrical power generation however indonesia is still in the planning zone. somewhat due to indonesia having lots of other options to get electrical energy. it is calculated that we will need around 4 nuclear power plant in the late 2020s.. and if i'm not mistaken russia and japan each has some sort of an agreements with indonesian gov to build them.

and what do you mean when you write security and diplomatic alliances..??
if it's defense pact like nato and others, then i'm pretty sure that'll never happen with indonesia.. our foreign policy in a way kind of opposes that to happen..

 

[Nike]

define becoming a nuclear power?? is it to be a country that has nuclear weapon(s) or country that utilize nuclear energy for power generation, research and industries?
if it's the first, then i'm afraid that that'll will not gonna happen anytime soon. indonesia has ratified NPT since the 70s and promoting it globally still. and i hope will continue to do so.
if it's the later then fyi indonesia has been utilizing nuclear energy since the late 50s for research and industries. for electrical power generation however indonesia is still in the planning zone. somewhat due to indonesia having lots of other options to get electrical energy. it is calculated that we will need around 4 nuclear power plant in the late 2020s.. and if i'm not mistaken russia and japan each has some sort of an agreements with indonesian gov to build them.

and what do you mean when you write security and diplomatic alliances..??
if it's defense pact like nato and others, then i'm pretty sure that'll never happen with indonesia.. our foreign policy in a way kind of opposes that to happen..

lol dont take him seriously, Indonesia had researching about Atomic bombs via PRC during Guided Democracy era as being mentioned during conversation between Soekarno and Chou En Lai when the latter visit to Jakarta, far more early than Pakistan nuclear weapon programme actually. The programme is in conjunction with the active Indonesian rocket programme backed up by several Socialist countries.

Soeharto rising, mean the ends for all of the nonsense programme and he diverted all the research and efforts toward civilian programme, though he is deliberately not backing up the Indonesian Nuclear agency with sufficient funds. The same goes with Indonesian rocket programme.

Indonesia promotes global treaty to ban nuclear weapons
Senin, 13 Maret 2017 18:32 WIB - 0 Views

Reporter: Aditya E.S. Wicaksono

Foreign Minister Retno L.P. Marsudi speech when opening the Regional Dialogue and Consultation on the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) entitled "Towards Preparatory Committee Meeting 2017" which was attended by representatives of 35 countries party to the NPT in the Asia-Pacific, in Jakarta, Monday (March 13, 2017). (ANTARA/Suwandy)

Jakarta (ANTARA News) - Indonesia, along with states without nuclear weapons, are working together to promote the establishment of a convention to ban the use of nuclear weapons, an official said here on Monday.

Director General of Multilateral Affairs of Ministry of Foreign Affairs Hasan Kleib said here on Monday that Indonesia and several countries have been working together to promote an open working group to discuss and draft a nuclear weapon convention.

"The countries have been gathered to promote a new initiative," Kleib said after attending a Regional Dialogue and Consultation on the Treaty of the Non-Proliferation (NPT) of Nuclear Weapon held in Jakarta on Monday along with the Minister of Foreign Affairs Retno LP Marsudi.

Nuclear weapon has been classified as a weapon of mass destruction, along with biological and chemical weapons.

The international society has signed conventions on biological and chemical weapons.

"We also want a convention on a total ban of nuclear weapon," Kleib stated.

Kleib urged the five countries, namely the United States, Britain, France, China, and Russia, which are currently possessing nuclear weapons, to meet their promise within the NPT to negotiate faithfully to remove their nuclear weapons completely.

The NPT is an international treaty, signed in July 1 1968, whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapon and weapons technology.

As many as 190 countries have taken part in the treaty which has three pillars, namely non-proliferation, disarmament, and peaceful use of nuclear energy.

"Indonesia has always been consistent that the implementation of the NPTs three pillars should be in balance," Marsudi noted.

The current global situation has become a challenge and has forced commitment by the NPT member countries to achieve progress by implementing the NPTs three pillars, she remarked.

As many as 26 representatives from countries in the Asia-Pacific Region attended the meeting held in Jakarta on March 13 and 14.

The meeting was one of the series to prepare the first NPT Preparatory Committee, which is scheduled to be held in Vienna, Austria, from May 2 to 12, 2017.

The Preparatory Committee will be the first of the three planned sessions that will be held prior to the 2020 Review Conference.
(Uu.A059/INE/KR-BSR/B003)
Editor: Priyambodo RH

COPYRIGHT © ANTARA 2017

 

[asad71]

define becoming a nuclear power?? is it to be a country that has nuclear weapon(s) or country that utilize nuclear energy for power generation, research and industries?
if it's the first, then i'm afraid that that'll will not gonna happen anytime soon. indonesia has ratified NPT since the 70s and promoting it globally still. and i hope will continue to do so.
if it's the later then fyi indonesia has been utilizing nuclear energy since the late 50s for research and industries. for electrical power generation however indonesia is still in the planning zone. somewhat due to indonesia having lots of other options to get electrical energy. it is calculated that we will need around 4 nuclear power plant in the late 2020s.. and if i'm not mistaken russia and japan each has some sort of an agreements with indonesian gov to build them.

and what do you mean when you write security and diplomatic alliances..??
if it's defense pact like nato and others, then i'm pretty sure that'll never happen with indonesia.. our foreign policy in a way kind of opposes that to happen..

1. I definitely meant nuclear weapons. Only then Australia-West will cease harassing you.
2. During 1965 Indo-Pak War Sukarno had sent a troop of tanks to E Pak (now BD). These PT-76s were sent as the advance team. And when Air Marshal Asghar Khan visited Jakarata just after the cease-fire, the Indonesian Air Chief had told him to go round all airbases in the country and select whatever he liked.
3. Just after Pak Eastern Command had surrendered, Indonesian Navy shot and sunk an IN craft that was chasing a fleeing PN patrol craft. This matter has been hushed up, but the RMN vessels in the area clearly witnessed what had happened.
4. Yes, it should be a deal like NATO and European Common Market put together.

 

[pr1v4t33r]

With the expertise learned from developing medium tank, Pindad will be able to design and implement better armor for its existing products in the future.

Amphibious Reconnaissance Battalion

 

[gondes]

INSIGHT: Should Indonesia and Australia jointly patrol the South China Sea?

• Evan A. Laksmana
  Researcher at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
  

Seattle | Mon, March 13, 2017 | 08:35 am

Stronger ties: President Joko "Jokowi" Widodo and his counterpart Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull. (Courtesy of the Presidential Office/File)
In an interview with The Australian shortly before his visit to Sydney on Feb. 26 and 27, President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo reportedly opened the door for Indonesia and Australia to jointly patrol the South China Sea.

This notion, however, never made its way to the joint statement or the Joint Declaration on Maritime Cooperation issued at the end of the visit. Subsequently, on the sidelines of the Indian Ocean Rim Association Summit in Jakarta last week, Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull downplayed the idea further.

Similarly, Indonesian officials never confirmed specific plans for a joint patrol as such. Instead, they reiterated the shared strategic interest with Australia and the cooperative opportunities in the broader maritime domain.

This rise and fall of the “South China Sea joint patrol” narrative is reminiscent of the aftermath of the Indonesia-Australia Foreign and Defense Ministers 2+2 Dialogue in Bali last October.

Then, Indonesian Defense Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu told a post-meeting press conference that he had discussed a joint “peace patrol” in the South China Sea with his Australian counterpart. The Indonesian Foreign Ministry was mum, however, and Ryamizard backtracked within a few days.

These rollercoaster developments suggest several cautionary notes.

First is on terminology. While press reports throw around “joint patrols” to describe activities done together at sea to “guard” the waters, regional states employ distinct terms.

There’s a difference between “joint” and “coordinated” patrols. While in some instances a joint (or combined) operation refers to a navy-air force-army activity, it often denotes the integrated pooling and deployment of assets from different countries for an agreed-upon mission.

The “Eyes-in-the-Sky” operation in the Malacca Strait, for example, uses maritime patrol aircraft from Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand to form a patrol mission team. Or more broadly, consider the UN Security Council-mandated multinational forces patrolling the pirate-infested waters off the coast of Somalia and the Horn of Africa.

While joint patrols under such task forces are more missionoriented, “coordinated” patrols (CORPAT) are limited to each country focusing on its own waters. Put simply, you patrol your waters while I patrol mine, but we coordinate the specific time and area.

For example, the Malacca Strait Sea Patrol — the original model for the recently launched Sulu Sea trilateral patrols — allows participating navies to conduct coordinated sea patrols while facilitating information sharing between ships and their operational centers. A similar logic applies to the existing Australia-Indonesia Coordinated Patrol launched in 2010 covering the shared maritime boundaries to the south of West Timor.

So, while we can debate the different interpretations held, locating the patrolling terminology within its proper policy context is not mere semantics; it has legal, strategic and operational implications. We should keep this in mind when assessing reports claiming that Indonesia “proposed” (or “backed down from”) joint patrols in the South China Sea.

The second point is on strategic logic. If we can consider the “South China Sea joint patrol” narrative as the product of media hype and Jakarta’s haphazard political communications, we should be cautious in examining the merits of the idea itself.

It goes without saying that Indonesia and Australia share a common interest in ensuring peace and stability in the South China Sea, but it does not follow that the only way to advance this interest is through a joint patrol, especially if it is pitched as a Freedom of Navigation Operation against China’s now-illegal “nine-dash line” claims.

As Indonesian and Australian leaders recently acknowledged, there is no need to unnecessarily escalate the tension in the area. Therefore, the commitment to the ASEAN-China Code of Conduct process as stated in the Joint Declaration on Maritime Cooperation is a step in the right direction; although alternative strategies to push it forward are sorely needed.

Bottom line, the South China Sea alone does not and should not define the strategic relationship between Indonesia and Australia.

For one thing, the South China Sea could turn into ugly domestic and regional quicksand for Indonesia and Australia as two non-claimants, especially if the United StatesChinese strategic dynamic remains the driving force. For another, there is already plenty of work to do on the maritime domain between the two countries as the maritime Joint Declaration highlights.

Finally, on operational reality. Assuming we can ignore the above concerns — which would be foolish — the “South China Sea joint patrol” narrative does not make operational sense.

If it is a joint patrol, are we expecting an Indonesian-Australian taskforce to run counterpiracy operations around the Natunas? If it’s a coordinated patrol, where would the specific waters be? Australia does not border the Natunas, while Indonesia’s EEZ in the area has been declared but is still being negotiated with neighboring countries.

Indonesia has always been particular about agreeing to coordinated, rather than joint, patrolling mechanisms, for historic, political and operational reasons. Also, Indonesia is unlikely to conduct FONOP-style operations in the South China Sea on its own, let alone with Australia.

Taken as a whole, the Indonesia-Australia “South China Sea joint patrol” narrative is ultimately flawed and should be discarded if the above concerns still hold.

***

The writer is a researcher at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Jakarta and currently a visiting fellow at the National Bureau of Asian Research in Seattle, Washington. The views expressed are his own.

---------------

http://www.thejakartapost.com/acade...ralia-jointly-patrol-the-south-china-sea.html

 

[Nike]

it seems in near future, every raider batt. will have Komodo APC as their assault vehicle. Around one company strength per batt. will be ideal

FROM INDONESIA
22 PRAJURIT TERIMA PELATIHAN KENDARAAN KOMODO
14 MARCH 2017 DIANEKO_LC LEAVE A COMMENT
Peralatan Kodam Iskandar Muda bekerja sama dengan PT. Pindad, menggelar latihan mengendarai Kendraan Komodo. Pelatihan tersebut akan dilaksanakan selama tiga hari mulai 13 sampai dengan 16 Maret 2017 di Gudang peralatan Daerah Paldam dan lapangan Rindam.

Latihan mengendarai Kendraan Komodo tersebut diikuti 22 prajurit terdiri dari lima prajurit dari satuan Yonif Raider 111 dan lima prajurit dari satuan Yonif Raider 112 serta lima dari prajurit Paldam IM. Sedangkan Hubdam IM dan Topdam masing-masing diikuti satu prajurit. Sementara untuk pendukung lima orang dari personel PT Pindad.

Nantinya, peserta tersebut menerima materi latihan yaitu, Pengenalan kendaran Komodo, Cara pengoperasioanalan, cara mengemudi siang dan malam, cara mengatasi gangguan saat musuh datang. Selain itu, cara pengoperasionalan Global Positioning System (GPS) dan Pengoperasionalan alat komunikasi.

Menurut Kapaldam Iskandar Muda, Kolonel Cpl Arif Hendro Djatmiko Hadi Soewignyo kendaran Komodo tersebut memilki kelincahan saat bergerak dan mempunyai kemampuan bertahan di medan pertempuran yang menjadi andalan.

“Kendaraan taktis Komodo memiliki mobility, survivabilit, dan fire power, yang dapat diandalkan. Mobility adalah kemampuan bergerak di medan berat dan menghindari serangan musuh. Survivability adalah kemampuan bertahan dari serangan musuh dengan mengandalkan badan kendaraan yang bulletproof. Fire power adalah kekuatan untuk menyerang musuh,” terang Kapaldam.

Photo : Komodo APC Variant of the Indonesian Army Infantry Battallion Raider 323. (Yonif Raider 323)

Sumber : Pen Kodam Iskandar Muda

 

[Nike]

one small patrol boat had been inducted

FROM INDONESIA
TNI AL TERIMA SATU KAPAL PATROLI DARI PEMKAB BELITUNG TIMUR
13 MARCH 2017 DIANEKO_LC LEAVE A COMMENT
Satu unit kapal patroli bertuliskan PATKAMLA diserah-terimakan Pemkab Beltim kepada Danlanal Babel Kolonel Laut Teguh Gunawan, Jumat (10/3/2017).

Serah-terima berlangsung di Pelabuhan ASDP Manggar.

Pantauan Pos Belitung, kapal abu-abu itu memiliki panjang sekitar 10 meter.

Sementara lebar diperkirakan tiga meter.

Wakil Bupati Belitung Timur Burhanudin (Aan) mengatakan, kapal tersebut diserahkan untuk sinergitas pengamanan laut di wilayah Beltim.

Menurutnya, Pemkab Beltim tak bisa lepas tangan begitu saja terhadap laut meski tidak memiliki kewenangan terkait ini.
“Ini dalam rangka mensinergitas pembangunan daerah di wilayah laut,” kata Aan.

Menurut Aan, wilayah laut Beltim adalah wilayah yang sangat vital.

Apalagi perairan Beltim masuk dalam wilayah ALKI (Alur Laut Kepulauan Indonesia) I dan dinilai sangat strategis.

Dia meminta, pihak terkait saling bersinergi terkait pengamanan wilayah ini.

Aan juga menyebut karena posisinya yang strategis maka perairan laut sekitar Beltim rentan terjadi praktik-praktik legal seperti penyelundupan, basecamp pembajakan laut, bahkan bukan tidak mungkin basecamp teroris.

“Daerah ini strategis, karena orang-orang Beltim tidak resek dengan orang, kalau ada orang datang ya terima saja. Ini rawan. ISIS misalnya, jangan dikira tidak mungkin (menyalahgunakan) 72 pulau (kecil) di Beltim. Dengan adanya kapal ini mari kita koordinasi jaga wilayah laut kita,” papar Aan.

Photo : Patkamla Maggar (Pos Belitung)

Sumber : Pos Belitung

 

[Nike]

VP Pence to visit Indonesia, meet Jokowi

• News Desk
  The Jakarta Post
• 
  
  Jakarta | Tue, March 14, 2017 | 10:31 am

Vice President Mike Pence speaks at the Trane Parts and Distribution Center in Louisville, Kentucky, on March 11 . (AP/Timothy D. Easley)
Coordinating Political, Legal and Security Affairs Minister Wiranto has said US Vice President Mike Pence will visit Indonesia and meet with President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo.

He said the information was conveyed by US Ambassador to Indonesia Joseph R. Donovan Jr. during a meeting at Wiranto's office in Central Jakarta on Monday.

Wiranto explained that during the meeting, he and Donovan discussed matters that would be highlighted during the Jokowi-Pence meeting, kompas.com reported.

He said several strategic issues that would be discussed involved relations between the two countries. He could not give details on when the meeting would take place.

“What we discussed was not about the time of the planned visit but more about the substance of matters the US vice president could use as a guideline in his talks with President Jokowi. It is related to strategic matters that could be discussed in their meeting,” said Wiranto. (dis/ebf)

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2017/03/14/vp-pence-to-visit-indonesia-meet-jokowi.html

 

[pr1v4t33r]

 

[kaka404]

1. I definitely meant nuclear weapons. Only then Australia-West will cease harassing you.
2. During 1965 Indo-Pak War Sukarno had sent a troop of tanks to E Pak (now BD). These PT-76s were sent as the advance team. And when Air Marshal Asghar Khan visited Jakarata just after the cease-fire, the Indonesian Air Chief had told him to go round all airbases in the country and select whatever he liked.
3. Just after Pak Eastern Command had surrendered, Indonesian Navy shot and sunk an IN craft that was chasing a fleeing PN patrol craft. This matter has been hushed up, but the RMN vessels in the area clearly witnessed what had happened.
4. Yes, it should be a deal like NATO and European Common Market put together.

having nuclear weapon doesn't stop a country from being "harassed" or "ridiculed". lets just take what happen to the US in the last few months as an example. there are many more example out there that shows how a nuclear powered country is "harassed" and "ridiculed" by external or even internal "parties", i'm very sure you are aware of them.

as for indonesia, indonesia is regularly being "harassed" and/or "ridiculed" by many parties, and it is not just by the "west". whether they are from our neighbour or a non-existing countries, from a big country or small, there will always someone out there trying to stir things up here. indonesia having a nuclear weapon won't stop them from doing so, and it doesn't make us any better. however, being able to answer these "harassment" cunningly, wisely and maturely does. i'm very sure you know that there are many parameters, sides, factors a country has that make them a powerful country and it's not just a nuclear weapon.

indonesia as a country has done a lot of things in the past. some even contradicted one another. but as i write before, i'm very sure a defense pact will never happen with indonesia.. our foreign policy opposes it. keep in mind however that it doesn't mean we don't have any defense or military cooperation. for example few months ago there's an article that mention a cooperation is being form by the indonesian, philippines, and malaysian arm forces to have a joint mission to fight against terrorist group in the philippines. this is not a defense pact but a cooperation. till today indonesia-pakistan and indonesia-turkey defense cooperation does exist. for example if you follow this thread then you might already know that indonesia and turkey are developing a tank together.

 

[asad71]

1. I definitely meant nuclear weapons. Only then Australia-West will cease harassing you.
2. During 1965 Indo-Pak War Sukarno had sent a troop of tanks to E Pak (now BD). These PT-76s were sent as the advance team. And when Air Marshal Asghar Khan visited Jakarata just after the cease-fire, the Indonesian Air Chief had told him to go round all airbases in the country and select whatever he liked.
3. Just after Pak Eastern Command had surrendered, Indonesian Navy shot and sunk an IN craft that was chasing a fleeing PN patrol craft. This matter has been hushed up, but the RMN

having nuclear weapon doesn't stop a country from being "harassed" or "ridiculed". lets just take what happen to the US in the last few months as an example. there are many more example out there that shows how a nuclear powered country is "harassed" and "ridiculed" by external or even internal "parties", i'm very sure you are aware of them.

as for indonesia, indonesia is regularly being "harassed" and/or "ridiculed" by many parties, and it is not just by the "west". whether they are from our neighbour or a non-existing countries, from a big country or small, there will always someone out there trying to stir things up here. indonesia having a nuclear weapon won't stop them from doing so, and it doesn't make us any better. however, being able to answer these "harassment" cunningly, wisely and maturely does. i'm very sure you know that there are many parameters, sides, factors a country has that make them a powerful country and it's not just a nuclear weapon.

indonesia as a country has done a lot of things in the past. some even contradicted one another. but as i write before, i'm very sure a defense pact will never happen with indonesia.. our foreign policy opposes it. keep in mind however that it doesn't mean we don't have any defense or military cooperation. for example few months ago there's an article that mention a cooperation is being form by the indonesian, philippines, and malaysian arm forces to have a joint mission to fight against terrorist group in the philippines. this is not a defense pact but a cooperation. till today indonesia-pakistan and indonesia-turkey defense cooperation does exist. for example if you follow this thread then you might already know that indonesia and turkey are developing a tank together.

1.But for nukes, DPRK and Pakistan would have lost sovereignty.
2. Your issues with Malaysia can be solved mutually, although some in Singapore would not appreciate this.
3. In the past serious attempts had been made for closer BD-Indonesia defense ties. This did not continue for conclusion because of the stance of our govts post-2000.
4. Australia has been playing the WCC (Western Christian Civilization) card to keep Indonesia in turmoil. Being the largest Muslim state and being well resourced, you are the obvious target.
5. Way out for you: get nukes and get into alliances.

 

[NEKONEKO]

5. Way out for you: get nukes and get into alliances.

Nukes : Nope.
Alliance : Nope.
It's okay to make friends but not okay to make gang.

This

if it's defense pact like nato and others, then i'm pretty sure that'll never happen with indonesia.. our foreign policy in a way kind of opposes that to happen..

 

[rondo.royal2]

huff .. Gw tadi baca di indomiliter ada artikel yg mempermasalahkan IFF ga ada di F16 tni AU..

Seakan akan F16 tanpa IFF .. Kalah dg tetangga .. Gw pingin koment disitu tapi kok .. Paling juga ga ditanggepin.
Semoga penulisnya baca..
Gini .. IFF itu hanya tanya jawab .. kalo tidak dijawab bukan berarti musuh .. Bisa jadi sipil .. Nah untuk mengetahui lebih lanjut siapa dia ? Memakai RWR .. Di RWR itu sudah tersimpan bank data sinyal apapun .. F16..su30..su27..gripen.. Untuk update bank data ini harganya mahal .

Kasus diatas bawean itu .. Pertama radar dibawah menangkap object .. Untuk mengenali dia musuh atau bukan .. Dikirim sinyal IFF .. Ternyata ga ada sinyal jawaban dari object .. Dikirimlah F16 ke lokasi .. RWR menangkap itu f18 ..terus didekati

Ini juga jawaban kenapa penerbangan gelap yg masuk diwilayah indo seringnya .. Sukhoi yg ngejar .. Karena radar dan IFF ga mengenali pesawat apa yg nyelonong masuk .. IFF ga ada jawaban bisa jadi sipil .. bisa jadi F15..F18 ..GRIPEN.. SUKHOI .. disusul lah pake SUKHOI disukhoi itu kan ada RWR nya nanti akan tau pesawat apa sipil atau militer

F16 AU tanpa IFF ga ada masalah .. Doktrin tni kan bukan ofensif tapi defensif..
Kalo doktrinnya ofensif baru masalah .. Karena keluar dari negaranya harus pake IFF itu fighter

 

[GraveDigger388]

huff .. Gw tadi baca di indomiliter ada artikel yg mempermasalahkan IFF ga ada di F16 tni AU..

Seakan akan F16 tanpa IFF .. Kalah dg tetangga .. Gw pingin koment disitu tapi kok .. Paling juga ga ditanggepin.
Semoga penulisnya baca..
Gini .. IFF itu hanya tanya jawab .. kalo tidak dijawab bukan berarti musuh .. Bisa jadi sipil .. Nah untuk mengetahui lebih lanjut siapa dia ? Memakai RWR .. Di RWR itu sudah tersimpan bank data sinyal apapun .. F16..su30..su27..gripen.. Untuk update bank data ini harganya mahal .

Kasus diatas bawean itu .. Pertama radar dibawah menangkap object .. Untuk mengenali dia musuh atau bukan .. Dikirim sinyal IFF .. Ternyata ga ada sinyal jawaban dari object .. Dikirimlah F16 ke lokasi .. RWR menangkap itu f18 ..terus didekati

Ini juga jawaban kenapa penerbangan gelap yg masuk diwilayah indo seringnya .. Sukhoi yg ngejar .. Karena radar dan IFF ga mengenali pesawat apa yg nyelonong masuk .. IFF ga ada jawaban bisa jadi sipil .. bisa jadi F15..F18 ..GRIPEN.. SUKHOI .. disusul lah pake SUKHOI disukhoi itu kan ada RWR nya nanti akan tau pesawat apa sipil atau militer

F16 AU tanpa IFF ga ada masalah .. Doktrin tni kan bukan ofensif tapi defensif..
Kalo doktrinnya ofensif baru masalah .. Karena keluar dari negaranya harus pake IFF itu fighter

Ngakses indomiliter lancar?

Saya coba buka website indomiliter udah berhari-hari Internal Server Error terus...aneh..