What's new

'Indo-Afghan military ties not aimed at anyone'

StormShadow

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
3,485
Reaction score
-10
'Indo-Afghan military ties not aimed at anyone'

Washington: Describing the India-Afghan military ties as historic, Afghan Army Chief Gen Sher Mohammad Karimi has said their relationship was not aimed at any third country, an obvious reference to Pakistan.

"Our relationship with India is not a new relation ...We had a historic and friendly relationship with India and this is a continuation of the past," Gen Karimi said.

"In fact, this partnership, to my understanding, is just continuation of the first such agreement between the two countries in 1955," the visiting Afghan General said, when asked about the recently signed strategic partnership between India and Afghanistan.

India is the first country with which Afghanistan had inked a strategic partnership, a move which was welcomed by the US and other western countries but it raised eyebrows in Pakistan.

Gen Karimi, who received the Distinguished Alumni Award from the National Defence University here on Thursday, said Afghanistan had a military relationship with India even prior to World War II. "I remember, we had commanders trained in India in the 1930s. Pilots were trained in India."

"From my point of view there is nothing new in it. Some people think that there is some kind of alliance between India and Afghanistan. No (that is not the case). Some of the neighbours think that way. But that is not true," Karimi said.

"Our relationship is a historic relationship. It was there. It is there, It will be there. They (India) have trained our Army officers, not only today, but also this goes back to pre-partition days," he said in response to a question.

Without naming Pakistan, Gen Karimi said that no country should be afraid of the military relationship between India and Afghanistan.

The top Afghan General said the Afghan National Army was ready to take charge of the security of the country by 2014 as envisioned in the Lisbon declaration. Karimi also emphasised on the importance of strategic partnership between Afghanistan and the US, noting that Kabul has come a long way and was on the right path in reaching its goals.

Highlighting the need for professionalising of the Army, Karimi said part of the process will involve developing the strategic communication capability of the Afghan National Army, so that it can reach out to the people and represent, not only the Army, but the government too.

http://zeenews.**********/news/world/indo-afghan-military-ties-not-aimed-at-anyone_757912.html
 
.
India will continue to stand by the defence establishment of our Afghan friends.

For long have the Afghans suffered at the hands of other.

It's time to take charge of their own destiny.
 
.
The aspirations of the Afghan people must be met and further strenghtened by historical ally India to make Afghanistan is a STRONG nation in the future.
 
. .
we'll not able to survive a single day without our military presence in Afghanistan after NATO's exit...accept this fact mate.:drag:
 
.
Long- Live Indo-Afghan Friendship. :tup::tup::tup:

india-strengthening-afghan-army-pentagon-1324299595.jpg
 
.
.
we'll not able to survive a single day without our military presence in Afghanistan after NATO's exit...accept this fact mate.:drag:
One will be highly mistaken if he ever thinks NATO/US is gonna exit Afghanistan. Just think,the west invaded Afghanistan to have a permanent presence in this region. After pouring billions of $, you think they will just exit!!?? At the most they will reduce their presence...but never will exit. Moreover,Russia is thinking to return back to Afghanistan. Nobody is gonna leave a mineral rich country!
 
. . .
Iran is no option for you because unlike Pakistan, they will not allow it free transit.

You have been using Pakistan route for all those years and it seems will you will continue to use it.

India wants an ‘anti-Pakistan’ Afghanistan: Musharraf – The Express Tribune
So what, we still can provide Afghans cheaper goods instead of what they will import from Europe or America even with the transit fee. And work on Chabahar Port shows that both Iran and India are satisfied with the transit deal.

You seems some sort of illiterate. India has only engineers and doctors for construction purpose. But Pakistan even don't want this, that's why Pakistan even has objection with Zarang-Delaram Highway and Chabahar-Hajigak rail project.

Plus, what Musharraf told shows Pakistan's paranoia with India, Pakistan thinks Afghanistan as their colony and Afghans should not keep any relation with India. That's why Pakistan has objection with even with economic purpose. With Afghanistan we can take our trade to 3-4 Billion USD and increasing trade always bring prosperity.

Worth Watching for You...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
. . .
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom