India's top leadership, including PM Modi, to visit Russia

[Hindustani78]

Lol, please let's not delude ourselves. Comparing the Akash to the S-300 is embarassing let alone the next generation S-500!

Akash is a very good start but it isn't anywhere near world-beating.

I am just saying that we are working on ours Indigenous systems.

 

[Tshering22]

We don't have any thing comparable to s400 till date,its a fact. we have to learn to accept facts first....


If there is any such offer on co development for s 500 or advanced one,its good deal I think.

Can you technically prove that the Pradyum BMD system developed by India is not technically comparable?

Nothing really against your statement; I just want to understand your view.

@Abingdonboy

Why we need S400/500 when AAd could do the same job apart from being used as Anti ballistic Missile..?

Because knowing DPSUs, we will have the indigenous BMD system only by 2019 at the earliest.

 

[#hydra#]

Can you technically prove that the Pradyum BMD system developed by India is not technically comparable?

Nothing really against your statement; I just want to understand your view.



Because knowing DPSUs, we will have the indigenous BMD system only by 2019 at the earliest.

Both have deferent architecture. What I understood is that, our BMD is tailor made anti ballistic missile defense system with very less or even zero chance against high maneuvering flying objects, where as s400 is an integrated missile defense system which is capable of taking down both missiles and aircrafts(I think even stealth bombers).PAD/PDV may be a better option for anti ballistic missile may be not, that doesn't nullify the requirement of s400 type defense system vice versa also. We need both type of system in order to cope up credible future aerial threats. Till date DRDO never said any thing about the deployment strategy of BMD, most likely it will be for point defense in high valued area like big cites. Advantages of s400 are its mobility, can be deployed near to fighting zones, tailored for working in dense electronic warfare environment, comprises 3 different types of missile for long medium short ranges (long range missiles are very good deterrent against HARM type missile, a freedom which we don't have in short ranged akash missile defense system) ,can be used effectively against stealth/low observable aircrafts currently under developments in china and can act as a first line of defense against nuclear tipped missiles.

Indigenously developed ‘Akash’ surface-to air missile system is there which is developed jointly by DRDO and BEL.

Akash, the surface-to-air missile system, can target an aerial object or aircraft upto 30 kilometres at an altitude of 18,000 metres. Though the Air Force version of this missile system has already been inducted, the Army’s version of Akash supersonic missile will be capable of flying at more than twice the speed of sound, according to defence officials. The heart of the Akash is the ‘Rohini’ radar that can detect an aircraft 120 km away. And this mobile missile system will be mounted on Tatra vehicles to provide a higher degree of speed and mobility.
“Akash air defence system is fully autonomous with capability to handle multiple aerial targets including very low flying ones,” said an official.

what will happen when enemy fire an anti radiation missile from a safe distance, in such a situation triumph has an edge over any of the anti ac system currently used by india.Thanks to its operational envelope.

You peoples still in Russian propaganda I think..! no one offer you a Deal which is not met the MCTR regulations whether it's Defensive or Offensive

Does Trident2 and tomahawk used by Royal navy comes under MTCR or what?

 

[SajeevJino]

Both have deferent architecture. What I understood is that, our BMD is tailor made anti ballistic missile defense system with very less or even zero chance against high maneuvering flying objects, where as s400 is an integrated missile defense system which is capable of taking down both missiles and aircrafts(I think even stealth bombers).PAD/PDV may be a better option for anti ballistic missile may be not, that doesn't nullify the requirement of s400 type defense system vice versa also. We need both type of system in order to cope up credible future aerial threats. Till date DRDO never said any thing about the deployment strategy of BMD, most likely it will be for point defense in high valued area like big cites.

first who is going to launch a heavy HTK interceptor to intercept a Highly maneuverable Fighter jets or Cruise Missiles, we have Barak's we have Akash we have Spy Der. PAD/PDV is meant for Tier 1 Anti Ballistic missile shield only.

DRDO earlier said before 2014 they will deploy Tier 1

Advantages of s400 are its mobility, can be deployed near to fighting zones, tailored for working in dense electronic warfare environment, comprises 3 different types of missile for long medium short ranges (long range missiles are very good deterrent against HARM type missile, a freedom which we don't have in short ranged akash missile defense system) ,can be used effectively against stealth/low observable aircrafts currently under developments in china and can act as a first line of defense against nuclear tipped missiles.

any Russians enlighten me S 400 house three different missiles in It's battery

also US will not use HARM for SEAD role they comes with MALD and JSOW

what will happen when enemy fire an anti radiation missile from a safe distance, in such a situation triumph has an edge over any of the anti ac system currently used by india.Thanks to its operational envelope.

Mine have 1000 km Long Range Swordfish Radar that can track hostile Missiles at far range, your take on 1000 km range ARM.

Does Trident2 and tomahawk used by Royal navy comes under MTCR or what?

sorry I don't know .. someone here told me MCTR is something 300 Kilometers