What's new

India's Top Five Achievements Since Independence ( 1947 )

February 15, 2006 | By Li Ming, Minghui correspondent

(Clearwisdom.net) In the past 13 years of genocide against Falun Gong launched by Jiang’s Communist regime,......

thanks for your hard working.hahaha:rofl:
it may be very convincing to those who know nothing about the Falun gong.haha.........:rofl:

now i tell my own story.
1.many years ago when i was in middle school,it was a sunday ,i saw a book called 转法伦(roll Falun)in my maternal grandmother's home.falun gong was not banned and i know nothing about it at that time.so i tried to read it,i clears remember the beginning of the content is very fantasy,the main idea is that human have a third eye(closed) on the forehead and two falun(wheels) in the abdomen.Believers should practice to open the third eye and emerge the wheels........i was so young(abou 13 or 14 years old) at that time that i know nothing about politics, but i'm sure the book was anti-science,so i stoped reading it.

2.one of my mother's colleagues was a falun gong practicer.she quit her job(teacher,nice career and income) and just do nothing(even don't talk to her husband and children) at home for years,and refused treatment when illed.she was mental patient in the view of those who knew her. what a pity.
 
Indians dont like critisizm...ehh..so much for tolerance..so one has to be selective?

Let them open a thread for criticizing India.. we are civilized and a proper and constructive criticism should be presented at the correct forum (thread).. mixing topics only creates chaos.. I thought you were intelligent e.g. ought to understand...
 
despite the fact that it still has to borrow fundamental of governance from its colonial past.

you forgot to add............. ' to make it work for such a large and diverse country '. You can see it is not easy from your own country experience.

I would also add conducting elections every 5 years in a country of our size is a huge undertaking and the magnitude of its scale is mind boggling.
 
Well some countries were gifted so called "freedom" while their Father of the Nation was getting buggered by a German wrestler; and the second leader was having relations with both of the GG couple - according to Indian media. We, BD, fought for ourselves, sacrificed lives and shed blood by tons for 9 months. Wily, crooked, cunning Indians jumped in last 10 days to steal victory from us. We defeated Pak Eastern Command, not Indians. They couldn't have done that in a million years with their poor professionalism and the lousy corps of officers. We saw how pathetic they are in the battle-field.

What would have happened if we did not enter the picture in 1971??? What would have happened if we sent back some ten million refugees??

Rag tag cadre of mukti bahini would not have been able to contain tide of refugees pouring from E. Pakistan into India. they were contributing to the exodus because they were waging a war. They were not in position to take care of their needs because they had no institutional frame work in place. It would have been tragedy of epic proportion.

Pakistan would have had opportunity to send backups and ammunition through sea and air. There would have been more deaths and mayhem and wanton destruction of your property.

Indian contribution for BD liberation:

Indian public contributed their time and money to feed and shelter the refugees. Many of the families were given shelter in their own homes.They saw first hand the atrocities committed by Pakistani army and saw the need to teach them a lesson. They raised funds for war effort. Indian leaders got into the act and started supporting MB financially and morally.

India did all the legwork to garner world sympathy. We persuaded the world leaders to back us up in case of war.

While you guy were fighting to contain Pakistani troops in your neighborhoods, our Indian air force and Navy was containing Pakistan navy and air force.

We handled both western and eastern fronts and made both Pakistan air force and navy ineffective.

When we finally advanced into your country we pretty much sealed the fate of retreating Pakistani army who were already low in ammunition and moral. They were totally cut off and could not go on fighting and had to surrender. It was a win win situation for both of us. We were successful in breaking up Pakistan into two with much needed contribution from MB and you guys got what you were demanding, your own country.
 
But I thought in Hinduism, beef are forbidden? There would be restaurant that sell beef, I'm sure. But they are probably in the form of steak or Halal style instead of just part of Indian restaurant. Am I correct.

Also, why doesn't Indians eat a lot of pork? Pork seems to be a specialty food to Indians, am I correct?

Come to Kerala, you will see Hindus eating beef :D.. And it will definitely a part of Indian restaurant.. You will see different varieties of beef dishes.. @KRAIT is coming to Kerala to eat beef samosa, you can join him
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What would have happened if we did not enter the picture in 1971??? What would have happened if we sent back some ten million refugees??

Rag tag cadre of mukti bahini would not have been able to contain tide of refugees pouring from E. Pakistan into India. they were contributing to the exodus because they were waging a war. They were not in position to take care of their needs because they had no institutional frame work in place. It would have been tragedy of epic proportion.

Pakistan would have had opportunity to send backups and ammunition through sea and air. There would have been more deaths and mayhem and wanton destruction of your property.

Indian contribution for BD liberation:

Indian public contributed their time and money to feed and shelter the refugees. Many of the families were given shelter in their own homes.They saw first hand the atrocities committed by Pakistani army and saw the need to teach them a lesson. They raised funds for war effort. Indian leaders got into the act and started supporting MB financially and morally.

India did all the legwork to garner world sympathy. We persuaded the world leaders to back us up in case of war.

While you guy were fighting to contain Pakistani troops in your neighborhoods, our Indian air force and Navy was containing Pakistan navy and air force.

We handled both western and eastern fronts and made both Pakistan air force and navy ineffective.

When we finally advanced into your country we pretty much sealed the fate of retreating Pakistani army who were already low in ammunition and moral. They were totally cut off and could not go on fighting and had to surrender. It was a win win situation for both of us. We were successful in breaking up Pakistan into two with much needed contribution from MB and you guys got what you were demanding, your own country.


1. You have a very hazy idea about what you are talking about.

a. The refugees were 100% Hindus. As such there was a tremendous pressure on GOI from Tripura, W Bengal and Indians in general to assist them. It was not that India was footing the bill; the world community, UNHCR, etc were doing that mostly.

b. India's masters, the Soviets had been approached by our Communist leaders, Moni Singh and Muzaffar Ahmed for assistance. And they in turn asked India to be on our side.

c. The bulk of the weapons we used were Czechoslovakian or from Eastern Bloc, not Indian.

d. Yes, many Indians contributed funds and helped in raising this - like late Nawab Patuadi and his Begum Sharmila Thakur. Like the Beetles. Like Pandit Ravi Shankar. Like Johnstnehoue, British MP, etc.

2. This was a golden opportunity for India to break-up Pakistan, and Indira Gandhi did not loose that opportunity. In fact, many say India had a hand in creating differences / suspicions between the two wings leading to 1971 War.

3. After the pathetic and miserable performance of IA in 1962, Ran of Kutch and 1965, Indian military was looking for an opportunity to redeem itself. It was too easy for Manekshaw to steal victory from us.

4. You forget Mukti Bahini was led by professional officers of ex-PA. IA officers were no patch on them in terms of professionalism. We worked out our own strategy working under huge adversity. For instance, we didn't have any weapons of our own except SAs that we carried when defecting. Indians ensured we received only SAs from the Eastern bloc. Our communication sets were confiscated by Indians and we had to make do with IA wireless operators provided during ops. We were not allowed to organize any Intel.

5. By and large, as of Sep '71, PA troops had realized that they were fighting a wrong war for all the wrong reasons. Gross indiscipline and immorality at the higher level totally broke the morale factor. Satisfactory logistics was impossible to maintain. Pakistan's treasury had become empty. Diplomatically Pakistan was isolated. Sensible Pakistanis like Asghar Khan and others were speaking out against the war on own population. Cases were reported where officers were refusing to obey unlawful orders like killing civilians. Even USA,China and Iran were asking for an end to the war.

6. By Sep PA troops had become too dispersed to be of any use for set battles. Isolated outlets, even commanded by NCOs, became easy prey for us. The total population of BD was helping us in one way or the other. Even many Razakars were quick to come over to our side whenever they got a break. Civil functionaries, apparently pro-Pak, were mostly working for us. Only a small marginal population belonging to Jam'at, ML, PDP and N e I, and Urdu speaking people were supporting Pakistan. On the other hand, almost the entire 10 mlln Hindus who had fled into India, refused to take up arms for our cause.

7. As such it is no wonder that the final conventional phase push did not find much opposition. Hili was one exception. We hardly fired a bullet till reaching Daudkandi near Dhaka from the east. Similar was the situation in the north where Kader Siddiqui was dominating the area. Jessore fell the first day. All this was due to our guerrilla activities.

8. Osmani was to launch his attack all by himself at the onset of the next monsoon - that is in another 6 months. We had already organized 3 X Bdes. By that time another 3 would have been added.

9. FYI, Osmani had also drawn up various contingencies. One of them was an Indo-Pak understanding sacrificing our cause.

10. In short, we had realized then and know it fully well now, that Indians are insincere, unreliable who would stab us in the back given an opportunity.

What would have happened if we did not enter the picture in 1971??? What would have happened if we sent back some ten million refugees??

Rag tag cadre of mukti bahini would not have been able to contain tide of refugees pouring from E. Pakistan into India. they were contributing to the exodus because they were waging a war. They were not in position to take care of their needs because they had no institutional frame work in place. It would have been tragedy of epic proportion.

Pakistan would have had opportunity to send backups and ammunition through sea and air. There would have been more deaths and mayhem and wanton destruction of your property.

Indian contribution for BD liberation:

Indian public contributed their time and money to feed and shelter the refugees. Many of the families were given shelter in their own homes.They saw first hand the atrocities committed by Pakistani army and saw the need to teach them a lesson. They raised funds for war effort. Indian leaders got into the act and started supporting MB financially and morally.

India did all the legwork to garner world sympathy. We persuaded the world leaders to back us up in case of war.

While you guy were fighting to contain Pakistani troops in your neighborhoods, our Indian air force and Navy was containing Pakistan navy and air force.

We handled both western and eastern fronts and made both Pakistan air force and navy ineffective.

When we finally advanced into your country we pretty much sealed the fate of retreating Pakistani army who were already low in ammunition and moral. They were totally cut off and could not go on fighting and had to surrender. It was a win win situation for both of us. We were successful in breaking up Pakistan into two with much needed contribution from MB and you guys got what you were demanding, your own country.


1. You have a very hazy idea about what you are talking about.

a. The refugees were 100% Hindus. As such there was a tremendous pressure on GOI from Tripura, W Bengal and Indians in general to assist them. It was not that India was footing the bill; the world community, UNHCR, etc were doing that mostly.

b. India's masters, the Soviets had been approached by our Communist leaders, Moni Singh and Muzaffar Ahmed for assistance. And they in turn asked India to be on our side.

c. The bulk of the weapons we used were Czechoslovakian or from Eastern Bloc, not Indian.

d. Yes, many Indians contributed funds and helped in raising this - like late Nawab Patuadi and his Begum Sharmila Thakur. Like the Beetles. Like Pandit Ravi Shankar. Like Johnstnehoue, British MP, etc.

2. This was a golden opportunity for India to break-up Pakistan, and Indira Gandhi did not loose that opportunity. In fact, many say India had a hand in creating differences / suspicions between the two wings leading to 1971 War.

3. After the pathetic and miserable performance of IA in 1962, Ran of Kutch and 1965, Indian military was looking for an opportunity to redeem itself. It was too easy for Manekshaw to steal victory from us.

4. You forget Mukti Bahini was led by professional officers of ex-PA. IA officers were no patch on them in terms of professionalism. We worked out our own strategy working under huge adversity. For instance, we didn't have any weapons of our own except SAs that we carried when defecting. Indians ensured we received only SAs from the Eastern bloc. Our communication sets were confiscated by Indians and we had to make do with IA wireless operators provided during ops. We were not allowed to organize any Intel.

5. By and large, as of Sep '71, PA troops had realized that they were fighting a wrong war for all the wrong reasons. Gross indiscipline and immorality at the higher level totally broke the morale factor. Satisfactory logistics was impossible to maintain. Pakistan's treasury had become empty. Diplomatically Pakistan was isolated. Sensible Pakistanis like Asghar Khan and others were speaking out against the war on own population. Cases were reported where officers were refusing to obey unlawful orders like killing civilians. Even USA,China and Iran were asking for an end to the war.

6. By Sep PA troops had become too dispersed to be of any use for set battles. Isolated outlets, even commanded by NCOs, became easy prey for us. The total population of BD was helping us in one way or the other. Even many Razakars were quick to come over to our side whenever they got a break. Civil functionaries, apparently pro-Pak, were mostly working for us. Only a small marginal population belonging to Jam'at, ML, PDP and N e I, and Urdu speaking people were supporting Pakistan. On the other hand, almost the entire 10 mlln Hindus who had fled into India, refused to take up arms for our cause.

7. As such it is no wonder that the final conventional phase push did not find much opposition. Hili was one exception. We hardly fired a bullet till reaching Daudkandi near Dhaka from the east. Similar was the situation in the north where Kader Siddiqui was dominating the area. Jessore fell the first day. All this was due to our guerrilla activities.

8. Osmani was to launch his attack all by himself at the onset of the next monsoon - that is in another 6 months. We had already organized 3 X Bdes. By that time another 3 would have been added.

9. FYI, Osmani had also drawn up various contingencies. One of them was an Indo-Pak understanding sacrificing our cause.

10. In short, we had realized then and know it fully well now, that Indians are insincere, unreliable who would stab us in the back given an opportunity.

What would have happened if we did not enter the picture in 1971??? What would have happened if we sent back some ten million refugees??

Rag tag cadre of mukti bahini would not have been able to contain tide of refugees pouring from E. Pakistan into India. they were contributing to the exodus because they were waging a war. They were not in position to take care of their needs because they had no institutional frame work in place. It would have been tragedy of epic proportion.

Pakistan would have had opportunity to send backups and ammunition through sea and air. There would have been more deaths and mayhem and wanton destruction of your property.

Indian contribution for BD liberation:

Indian public contributed their time and money to feed and shelter the refugees. Many of the families were given shelter in their own homes.They saw first hand the atrocities committed by Pakistani army and saw the need to teach them a lesson. They raised funds for war effort. Indian leaders got into the act and started supporting MB financially and morally.

India did all the legwork to garner world sympathy. We persuaded the world leaders to back us up in case of war.

While you guy were fighting to contain Pakistani troops in your neighborhoods, our Indian air force and Navy was containing Pakistan navy and air force.

We handled both western and eastern fronts and made both Pakistan air force and navy ineffective.

When we finally advanced into your country we pretty much sealed the fate of retreating Pakistani army who were already low in ammunition and moral. They were totally cut off and could not go on fighting and had to surrender. It was a win win situation for both of us. We were successful in breaking up Pakistan into two with much needed contribution from MB and you guys got what you were demanding, your own country.


1. You have a very hazy idea about what you are talking about.

a. The refugees were 100% Hindus. As such there was a tremendous pressure on GOI from Tripura, W Bengal and Indians in general to assist them. It was not that India was footing the bill; the world community, UNHCR, etc were doing that mostly.

b. India's masters, the Soviets had been approached by our Communist leaders, Moni Singh and Muzaffar Ahmed for assistance. And they in turn asked India to be on our side.

c. The bulk of the weapons we used were Czechoslovakian or from Eastern Bloc, not Indian.

d. Yes, many Indians contributed funds and helped in raising this - like late Nawab Patuadi and his Begum Sharmila Thakur. Like the Beetles. Like Pandit Ravi Shankar. Like Johnstnehoue, British MP, etc.

2. This was a golden opportunity for India to break-up Pakistan, and Indira Gandhi did not loose that opportunity. In fact, many say India had a hand in creating differences / suspicions between the two wings leading to 1971 War.

3. After the pathetic and miserable performance of IA in 1962, Ran of Kutch and 1965, Indian military was looking for an opportunity to redeem itself. It was too easy for Manekshaw to steal victory from us.

4. You forget Mukti Bahini was led by professional officers of ex-PA. IA officers were no patch on them in terms of professionalism. We worked out our own strategy working under huge adversity. For instance, we didn't have any weapons of our own except SAs that we carried when defecting. Indians ensured we received only SAs from the Eastern bloc. Our communication sets were confiscated by Indians and we had to make do with IA wireless operators provided during ops. We were not allowed to organize any Intel.

5. By and large, as of Sep '71, PA troops had realized that they were fighting a wrong war for all the wrong reasons. Gross indiscipline and immorality at the higher level totally broke the morale factor. Satisfactory logistics was impossible to maintain. Pakistan's treasury had become empty. Diplomatically Pakistan was isolated. Sensible Pakistanis like Asghar Khan and others were speaking out against the war on own population. Cases were reported where officers were refusing to obey unlawful orders like killing civilians. Even USA,China and Iran were asking for an end to the war.

6. By Sep PA troops had become too dispersed to be of any use for set battles. Isolated outlets, even commanded by NCOs, became easy prey for us. The total population of BD was helping us in one way or the other. Even many Razakars were quick to come over to our side whenever they got a break. Civil functionaries, apparently pro-Pak, were mostly working for us. Only a small marginal population belonging to Jam'at, ML, PDP and N e I, and Urdu speaking people were supporting Pakistan. On the other hand, almost the entire 10 mlln Hindus who had fled into India, refused to take up arms for our cause.

7. As such it is no wonder that the final conventional phase push did not find much opposition. Hili was one exception. We hardly fired a bullet till reaching Daudkandi near Dhaka from the east. Similar was the situation in the north where Kader Siddiqui was dominating the area. Jessore fell the first day. All this was due to our guerrilla activities.

8. Osmani was to launch his attack all by himself at the onset of the next monsoon - that is in another 6 months. We had already organized 3 X Bdes. By that time another 3 would have been added.

9. FYI, Osmani had also drawn up various contingencies. One of them was an Indo-Pak understanding sacrificing our cause.

10. In short, we had realized then and know it fully well now, that Indians are insincere, unreliable who would stab us in the back given an opportunity.
 
@asad71 Somebody gave you an imposisation or what??:what:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was not talking about your posts.I was talking about the number of times you posted the same thing...

He does that when he wants to troll. He cannot take Indian progress in stride.:P
 
@@asad71

According to wiki...... 60% of people who fled to India were Hindus and rest were Christians, Buddhists and Muslims.
It is not exactly known what percentage of the people killed by the Pakistan army were Hindus, but it is safe to say it was disproportionately high. This widespread violence against Hindus was motivated by a policy to purge East Pakistan of what was seen as Hindu and Indian influences. The West Pakistani rulers identified the Bengali culture with Hindu and Indian culture, and thought that the eradication of Hindus would remove such influences from the majority Muslims in East Pakistan.

Many Hindus happened to be teachers, students, professors, intellectuals, doctors who were targeted first. Initially they resisted Pakistan army but were rounded up in large numbers and killed en masse. They were no match to well equipped professional Pakistan army. More than 2 million Hindus gave up their lives for your country. Many of their women were either widowed or raped by these brutes.

Why do you talk so disparagingly about BD Hindus ?? Why do you belittle their contributions to your country??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If one were to dissect and discuss these threadbare, these are in reality, India's Top 5 Failures Since 1947. All of them:

a. With six states under Maoists, Kashmir freedom-struggle and NE freedom struggles, where is the unity? Only diversity.

b. India is a graft-o-cracy which provides the major deposits into Swiss banks.

c. The Aam Admi of Super Poor India is the poorest in the world. On top of that the society suffers from various ills including rape. 74% of women claim to have been raped/ sexually harassed at one time or the other.

d. India's space program, nukes and missiles along with her DRDO and ISRO are the butt of the jokes. Some jokers keep fooling the gullible into authorizing mega projects with a view to financing the Swiss accounts.

e. The economy has grown to the extent that Ambani's residence has grown 27 levels. Some of the richest people are Indians who provide ready market and cheap labor for western capitalism. But India is home to the poorest people in the world and their number could fit into a continent.

Haq's Musings: 63 Years After Independence, India Remains Home to World's Largest Population of Poor, Hungry and Illiterates

Haq's Musings: India Tops in Illiteracy and Defense Spending
 
Come to Kerala, you will see Hindus eating beef :D.. And it will definitely a part of Indian restaurant.. You will see different varieties of beef dishes.. @KRAIT is coming to Kerala to eat beef samosa, you can join him

It's carabeef, buffalo meat that is consumed in and exported by India.

Being mostly vegetarian, neighboring Indians consume only 3.2 Kg of meat per capita, less than one-fifth of Pakistan's 18 Kg. Daal (legumes or pulses) are popular in South Asia as a protein source. Indians consume 11.68 Kg of daal per capita, about twice as much as Pakistan's 6.57 Kg.

Haq's Musings: Pakistan Among Top Meat Consuming Nations
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom