What's new

India's SHAME! 100 men offered to pay this '10-yr-old girl' to strip

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/i...erre-des-hommes-online-predators/20131106.htm

06sweetie.jpg


More than 100 Indians were among the 1,000 men caught trying to pay a computer-generated 10-year-old Filipina girl called Sweetie to perform sex acts online.

A Dutch children’s charity group Terre des Hommes set up a fake profile to catch online predators. In a 10-week sting carried out near Amsterdam, 20,000 men from 71 countries contacted her among whom 1,000 offered her money to take off her clothes in front of the webcam.
Of the 1,000 men, 254 were from the United States, 110 from the United Kingdom and 103 from India. The names of these alleged predators have been handed over to the Interpol.

"They were ready to pay Sweetie for sexual acts in front of her webcam," Albert Jaap van Santbrink, the rights group's head, told the media.

Terre des Hommes said it wanted to raise awareness about a largely unknown but quickly spreading new form of child exploitation known as webcam child sex tourism. It has launched a global campaign to stop “webcam sex tourism”.

Sweetie was created by the child rights group and deployed in Internet chat rooms from a remote building in Amsterdam. Within minutes she was swamped with requests.

The researchers pretended to be the girl while working undercover in a warehouse in Amsterdam. They used evidence including profiles on Skype and social media to identify the suspects, reports BBC.

The rights group has posted a documentary about its 10-week investigation on YouTube and started a petition aimed at pressing law enforcers to do more to halt such illegal sex show.

"We believe that criminal investigations using intrusive surveillance measures should be the exclusive responsibility of law enforcement agencies," spokesman Soren Pedersen told the Reuters.
 
100 pedophiles in a country of over a billion , not bad odd. i am sure it will be much higher in other countries. , but then its hafizzzz we are talking about !! he cant see past India:)
 
What those men did was wrong .
But @Hafizzz the title of your thread is even worst.
Because the headline should have been this

"254 men from the United States offered to pay a 10yr old girl to strip".

In your own words
Hafizzz said:
Of the 1,000 men, 254 were from the United States, 110 from the United Kingdom and 103 from India.



 
but then its hafizzzz we are talking about !! he cant see past India:)

And his signature proves it.:rofl:
 
Last edited:
Indian Trolls here blindly defending their countrymen !!! KIK
 
Hafizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 
What those men did was wrong .
But @Hafizzz the title of your thread is even worst.
Because the headline should have been this

"254 men from the United States offered to pay a 10yr old to girl strip".

I think title to news is given by rediff which is Indian.

@Topic - Type of organizations like mentioned in OP are actual culprit in spreading evil not controlling
 
Congratulation to indians..
India is on third number this time!!

Indians never grow at all......all they want to see is "India Shining" , "Credible India" etc LOL

u 2 retards try searching child sex in google trends n see which country's name pops up ..hint ..!! Land of the pureeee ...
 
u 2 retards try searching child sex in google trends n see which country's name pops up ..hint ..!! Land of the pureeee ...
The news was posted on REDIFF.COM which (in my knowledge) is an indian website. He just posted it. Why don't you go and start campaign against this website and whatever to stop your own indian men from posting it.
 
The news was posted on REDIFF.COM which (in my knowledge) is an indian website. He just posted it. Why don't you go and start campaign against this website and whatever to stop your own indian men from posting it.

It is a typical Indian behaviour to bash the messenger to hide all the Indian dirt that has been digged up
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom